Back to News
investment

AAAU vs. SIL: Comparing Direct & Indirect Exposure to Precious Metals

newsfeedback@fool.com (Adé Hennis)
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Two precious metals ETFs—one tracking physical gold (AAAU), the other silver mining stocks (SIL)—show stark differences in risk and exposure. AAAU holds gold bars directly, while SIL invests in 42 global miners. AAAU boasts a lower expense ratio (0.18% vs. SIL’s 0.65%) and less volatility (beta 0.13 vs. 0.78). However, SIL delivered nearly double the one-year return (173.52% vs. 73.1%) with higher risk. Over five years, AAAU grew $1,000 to $2,681 with a 20.94% max drawdown, while SIL reached $2,169 but suffered a 55.63% drop. SIL’s top holding, Wheaton, accounts for over 20% of its assets. Gold prices nearly doubled since early 2025 amid geopolitical tensions, boosting AAAU. Silver demand surged due to industrial uses, but mining challenges persist as 70% is a byproduct of other metals. Investors face a trade-off: AAAU offers stability with direct gold exposure, while SIL provides higher upside but greater volatility tied to mining operations and silver’s supply constraints.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
generated-image (58).png
Quantum News · Media Library

These two ETFs give exposure to two of the top metals on the market, but there are key differences in their levels of exposure. Both the Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU +2.41%) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL +5.15%) target precious metals, but in sharply different ways. SIL holds a basket of silver mining companies, while AAAU instead tracks physical gold. This comparison breaks down their differences in cost, returns, risk, and underlying holdings.Snapshot (cost & size)MetricSILAAAUIssuerGlobal XGoldman SachsExpense ratio0.65%0.18%1-yr return (as of Feb. 14, 2026)173.52%73.1%Beta0.780.13AUM$6.63 billion$3.13 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.AAAU’s expense ratio is more than three times smaller than SIL’s, while SIL has nearly double the one-year return with increased volatility. Performance & risk comparisonMetricSILAAAUMax drawdown (5 y)(55.63%)(20.94%)Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$2,169$2,681What's insideLaunched seven years ago, AAAU is designed to track the performance of physical gold, offering investors direct gold exposure by allocating 100% of its holdings in gold bars held in the U.K. Launched 15 years ago, SIL tracks silver miners globally, holding 42 stocks and focusing entirely on basic materials. Its largest positions are Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM +4.82%), Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS +6.12%), and Coeur Mining Inc. (CDE +7.16%), which are primarily Canadian mining companies. With over 15 years in operation and nearly $7 billion in assets under management, SIL relies more heavily on its top holding, Wheaton, which accounts for over 20% of its assets, compared to the other assets, which aren’t above 12%. What this means for investorsIn 2025, the precious metals market skyrocketed, with many metals often following Gold's price movements. Gold, along with other metals, is seen as a hedge against the U.S. dollar, especially during periods of geopolitical and economic turbulence. With international tariffs and heightened tensions throughout 2025 and this year, demand and prices for metals have risen significantly. Since the start of 2025 up until Feb. 14, 2026, the price of gold per ounce has nearly doubled. However, investors should be aware of the volatility of the precious metals market, especially with AAAU, since it directly holds gold. Precious metals are highly volatile compared to stocks, and prices can fall as quickly as they rise. In SIL’s case, silver’s value may continue to rise as it becomes increasingly rare and in demand, but silver mining companies may have to pivot operationally, as it’s estimated that over 70% of silver is mined indirectly as a byproduct of other metals. That’s because silver is difficult to mine on its own. As various industries become increasingly reliant on it for products such as electric vehicles, solar panels, and even medical applications, silver demand outpaces production. This may leave companies forced to shift towards mining other metals, which can be effective, but would dilute the concentration of silver mining for these stocks. Until then, both SIL and AAAU continue to benefit from the precious metal market’s meteoric rise in 2025 and so far in early 2026. For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link. Read NextFeb 14, 2026 •By Adé HennisAAAU vs. SGDM: Direct Gold Exposure or Gold Mining Companies?Feb 14, 2026 •By Adé HennisAAAU & SLV: Two Precious Metal ETFs That Can Add Some Shine to Your PortfolioJan 26, 2026 •By Adé HennisGold & Silver ETFs: Comparing AAAU vs. SLVPJan 20, 2026 •By Will HealyPPLT Delivers Bigger Gains Than AAAU but Swings More WidelyDec 20, 2025 •By Neha ChamariaGold ETFs Boom: GLD Is Larger in Size But AAAU Is More AffordableNov 9, 2025 •By Neha ChamariaGold ETFs: SPDR Gold Shares Offers Scale While AAAU Is More AffordableStocks MentionedGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETFNYSEMKT: AAAU$49.65 (+2.41%) $+1.17Global X Funds - Global X Silver Miners ETFNYSEMKT: SIL$101.64 (+5.15%) $+4.98*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Read Original

Tags

quantum-finance

Source Information

Source: The Motley Fool

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.