Bitcoin's Quantum threat is ‘real but distant,’ says Wall Street analyst as doomsday debate rages on - CoinDesk

Quantum computing poses a theoretical threat to Bitcoin, but the risk remains distant and manageable, according to Wall Street broker Benchmark. While quantum machines could eventually compromise certain cryptographic systems, Bitcoin has both the time and engineering path to evolve before that point, according to Benchmark analyst Mark Palmer, who has generally been bullish on the crypto industry as a whole. "While recent headlines have amplified concern that quantum advances could undermine the protocol’s cryptographic foundations, our analysis suggests that the risk is real but distant, and that it has both the time and technical flexibility required to adapt well before the threat becomes acute," Palmer said in the Thursday report. Quantum computing represents a looming cryptographic doomsday because it threatens to break the mathematical lock-and-key system that secures nearly every digital asset. While classical computers would take trillions of years to guess a Bitcoin private key, a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive that key from a public address in minutes, effectively allowing an attacker to unmask and drain wallets at will. The protocol’s primary vulnerability lies not in its SHA-256 hashing algorithm, used in mining (mechanism for minting new Bitcoin), but in the elliptic curve digital signature algorithm (ECDSA) that secures users’ private keys, Palmer wrote. Once a public key is revealed, typically when bitcoin is spent, it becomes, in theory, susceptible to a quantum attack. However, Palmer stressed that quantum computers capable of breaking ECDSA do not currently exist and are unlikely to emerge for at least another 10–20 years, if not longer. Today’s quantum systems are small-scale, error-prone, and incapable of sustained computations at the scale required to threaten blockchain infrastructure, the analyst said. Moreover, only a small fraction of the total bitcoin supply, estimated at 1–2 million BTC, is held in addresses with exposed public keys. These include early Satoshi-era coins and reused wallets, but even these are not yet practically vulnerable. Benchmark noted that spending bitcoin triggers a brief window in which the public key is broadcast to the network’s mempool, creating a theoretical opportunity for an attacker to intercept and redirect funds. Yet such a scenario would require an incredibly powerful, fault-tolerant quantum system and perfect execution. While the threat is early, the quantum threat to Bitcoin has recently become a hot topic. Leading bitcoin developers and advocates are pushing back (much like Palmer), arguing that machines capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography do not exist today and are unlikely to for decades. Meanwhile, some investors and Wall Street analysts are weighing the real threat it poses to bitcoin. Strategy (MSTR) executive chairman Michael Saylor has argued that quantum computing, while often sensationalized, threatens all forms of digital security, from banking to internet communications, not just Bitcoin. On the flipside, Christopher Wood, Jefferies' global head of equity strategy, removed a 10% bitcoin allocation from his model portfolio, citing long-term security concerns posed by advances in quantum computing. Regardless of the debate, the industry is taking preemptive steps for this potential long-term threat. Coinbase’s formation of a Quantum Advisory Council, announced earlier this month, marks a turning point in how quantum risk is managed: moving it from a theoretical conversation into a structured institutional strategy. Even Ethereum has taken the threat seriously and has elevated post-quantum security to a top strategic priority, forming a dedicated "Post Quantum" team. To Benchmark's Palmer, it's not all doom and gloom. Even in worst-case scenarios where some early tokens are lost to a quantum attack, Palmer sees no systemic risk to the protocol’s integrity. From an investor’s perspective, quantum computing is a long-term technical consideration, not an immediate threat or an investment thesis-breaker. Near-term drivers for bitcoin’s price remain focused on liquidity conditions, regulatory developments, and institutional adoption, not speculative timelines around quantum supremacy, Palmer added. Read more: Bitcoin’s quantum debate is resurfacing, and markets are starting to notice Accelerating Convergence Between Traditional and On-Chain Finance in 2026? AI-powered agents dominate the EasyA x Consensus Hong Kong hackathon Winning projects like FoundrAI demonstrate how generative AI is allowing developers to build market-ready products in just 48 hours. Disclosure & Polices: CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of Bullish (NYSE:BLSH), an institutionally focused global digital asset platform that provides market infrastructure and information services. Bullish owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets and CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish equity-based compensation. When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. More information These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance. These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly. These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising. These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information. These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.