Back to News
investment

Which Dividend ETF Is Best for the Long Term: Fidelity's FDVV or Schwab's SCHD?

The Motley Fool
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Fidelity’s FDVV outperformed Schwab’s SCHD over five years, growing $1,000 to $1,883 versus SCHD’s $1,503, despite its higher 0.15% expense ratio compared to SCHD’s 0.06%. FDVV leans toward tech (26%) and financials (18%), with top holdings like Nvidia and Apple, while SCHD favors defensive sectors: consumer staples, healthcare, and energy, reducing volatility. SCHD offers a higher 3.44% dividend yield and lower max drawdown (-16.84% vs FDVV’s -20.15%), appealing to income-focused, risk-averse investors seeking stability over growth. Both ETFs deliver strong long-term returns (~13% annualized) but diverge in strategy: FDVV targets high-yield tech-heavy stocks, while SCHD prioritizes quality dividend payers with stricter selection criteria. Analysts suggest SCHD for diversification beyond tech, but FDVV suits investors bullish on mega-cap tech’s continued dominance, given its sector tilt and recent performance edge.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Which Dividend ETF Is Best for the Long Term: Fidelity's FDVV or Schwab's SCHD?

Summarize this article with:

By Josh Kohn-Lindquist – Apr 24, 2026 at 2:10PM ESTKey PointsFDVV carries a higher expense ratio but has outperformed SCHD over the past five years.FDVV leans into technology and financials, while SCHD emphasizes consumer defensive, healthcare, and energy sectors.SCHD offers a higher dividend yield and lower drawdown, appealing to income-focused and risk-averse investors.Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD 0.80%) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV 0.08%) differ in cost, sector exposure, and recent performance, with FDVV showing higher five-year returns but at a higher fee and greater volatility.Both SCHD and FDVV are designed to provide equity income, but their strategies diverge. SCHD tracks a rules-based index focused on quality U.S. dividend payers, while FDVV tilts toward higher-yielding stocks with a technology and financials bias. This comparison highlights their costs, risks, performance, and portfolio differences to help readers determine which ETF best fits their needs.Snapshot (cost & size)MetricSCHDFDVVIssuerSchwabFidelityExpense ratio0.06%0.15%1-yr return (as of 2026-04-22)28.4%28.6%Dividend yield3.44%3.00%Beta0.660.84AUM$84.8 billion$8.5 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The one-year return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.FDVV charges a higher fee than SCHD, making SCHD the more affordable choice. SCHD also offers a higher dividend yield, which could appeal to those prioritizing income.Performance & risk comparisonMetricSCHDFDVVMax drawdown (5 y)-16.84%-20.15%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,503$1,883What's insideFDVV focuses on delivering a high dividend yield, with a notable tilt toward technology (26%), financial services (18%), and consumer cyclical (15%) sectors across its 119 holdings. Its largest positions include Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft. The fund has a 10-year track record and currently has no unusual features or quirks.In contrast, SCHD maintains a heavier allocation to consumer defensive, healthcare, and energy sectors, giving it a different risk and income profile. Its top holdings -- Texas Instruments, UnitedHealth, and Merck -- reflect this more defensive approach, which may help explain its lower volatility and higher yield compared to FDVV.For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.What this means for investorsI want to say, right up front, that both of these dividend ETFs are excellent choices for investors. Since debuting on the markets, SCHD and FDVV have delivered annualized total returns of 13.1% and 13.2%, while suffering relatively minimal drawdowns. Both ETFs have very reasonable expense ratios, dividend yields of 3% or higher, and hold over 100 stocks, providing solid diversification and stability.That said, if I were forced to pick between the two ETFs, I would lean ever so slightly toward SCHD, thanks to the fact that it doesn’t rely as heavily upon the technology sector. This decision is purely a personal preference for me, as I already have significant exposure to the mega-cap tech names and don’t want to double-dip in this area. For another investor, that might be the selling point for buying FDVV instead -- especially as these mega-cap tech names have helped the ETF vastly outperform over the last five years.This juxtaposition highlights that while both ETFs are great options for U.S. dividend stocks, investors need to decide which one best fits their portfolio. Ultimately, I’m going with SCHD thanks to its higher dividend yield, slightly lower expense ratio, smaller five-year drawdown, and its focus on the consumer defensive, healthcare, and energy sectors -- which I don’t have as much exposure to. If you’re interested in the big tech names, FDVV is most likely the better fit for you. If you prioritize stability and slightly better efficiency, SCHD may be the ticket.Read NextApr 24, 2026 •By Cory RenauerThe FDVV ETF Delivers Higher 5-Year Growth Than the HDV ETFApr 24, 2026 •By Will HealySLV Delivers Stronger Long Term Gains Than SGDMApr 24, 2026 •By Anders BylundThe Dow Is Down While the Nasdaq-100 Soars. Blame the Chips.Apr 24, 2026 •By John BallardVXUS vs. IEMG: Which International ETF Is the Better Buy?Apr 24, 2026 •By David DierkingWant $1 Million in Retirement? 3 Index Funds to Start Buying in April.About the AuthorJosh Kohn-Lindquist is a contributing Motley Fool stock market analyst covering consumer goods, industrials, and technology stocks. Previously, Josh was a senior mutual fund accountant at Gemini Fund Services. He holds a bachelor’s degree in business management from the University of South Dakota.TMFJorykoX@JorykoliStocks MentionedFidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity High Dividend ETFNYSEMKT: FDVV$58.64(-0.07%)-$0.04Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETFNYSEMKT: SCHD$31.18(-0.76%)-$0.24*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Read Original

Tags

energy-climate

Source Information

Source: The Motley Fool