Back to News
investment

IBIT and ETHA Charge the Same. The Similarities End There.

The Motley Fool
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
The iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and Ethereum Trust (ETHA) both charge a 0.25% expense ratio but show stark performance divergence in 2026, with ETHA up 40.7% while IBIT fell 14.1%. ETHA’s $7.6 billion AUM pales beside IBIT’s $63.7 billion, reflecting Ethereum’s smaller institutional adoption and higher volatility, evidenced by its 64% one-year drawdown versus Bitcoin’s 49.36%. Both ETFs offer direct crypto exposure without wallets or private keys, enabling tax-advantaged accounts like IRAs but sacrificing 24/7 trading and asset mobility for a 0.25% annual fee. ETHA, launched in mid-2024, lacks long-term data, while IBIT’s larger scale suggests deeper market trust—but neither fund pays dividends or deviates from single-asset tracking. Investors face a trade-off: ETHA’s higher returns and risk or IBIT’s stability and liquidity, with both eliminating crypto custody hurdles at the cost of fees and trading flexibility.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
IBIT and ETHA Charge the Same. The Similarities End There.

Summarize this article with:

By Seena Hassouna – Apr 24, 2026 at 7:49PM ESTKey PointsETHA has delivered a 40.7% one-year return compared to IBIT’s decline over the same periodBoth funds charge an identical 0.25% expense ratio and hold a single digital asset, but ETHA is much smaller by AUMETHA has experienced a deeper one-year drawdown, highlighting higher volatility relative to IBITThe iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (NASDAQ:IBIT) and the iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (NASDAQ:ETHA) both track single cryptocurrencies and charge the same expenses, but ETHA has seen stronger recent returns and a smaller asset base—while also exposing investors to greater drawdowns.Both IBIT and ETHA are single-asset exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from iShares, designed to give investors straightforward exposure to Bitcoin or Ether, respectively. This comparison looks at how these two crypto-focused ETFs stack up on cost, performance, risk, and portfolio characteristics to help investors decide which may fit their strategy.Snapshot (cost & size)MetricIBITETHAIssuerISharesISharesExpense ratio0.25%0.25%1-yr return (as of 2026-04-22)-14.1%40.7%AUM$63.7 billion$7.6 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.Both funds are equally priced at 0.25%, making cost a non-factor in the decision; neither fund currently offers a dividend yield.Performance & risk comparisonMetricIBITETHAMax drawdown (1 y)-49.36%-64.02%Growth of $1,000 over 1 year$859N/AWhat's insideETHA is a pure-play Ether ETF, holding only Ether and cash equivalents, with 100% of assets allocated to Ether. With just one holding and a fund age of 1.8 years, it offers direct tracking of Ether’s price movements and has no notable structural quirks or index tracking features.IBIT, in contrast, holds only Bitcoin and cash, representing a single-asset approach as well. It is much larger, with $63.7 billion in assets under management, and similarly lacks any unusual features or sector tilts. The key difference is the underlying cryptocurrency exposure: Bitcoin for IBIT, Ether for ETHA.For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.What this means for investorsThese two ETFs come from the same issuer, have the same 0.25% expense ratio and basic structure. Beyond that, IBIT and ETHA are very different trades right now. Over the trailing year, IBIT is down 14.1% while ETHA is up 40.7% — a gap that reflects how differently Bitcoin and Ether have moved, not any difference in fund quality or construction. ETHA's max drawdown over the past year hit -61.66%, compared to -49.36% for IBIT — better recent return, rougher ride.ETHA launched in mid-2024, which means it doesn't yet have a full year of data in some performance tools and lacks the track record that longer-tenured funds carry. That's not a reason to avoid it, but it's worth knowing you're working with a shorter history when sizing up the risk. IBIT, at $63.7 billion in AUM versus ETHA's $7.6 billion, has also attracted significantly more institutional buy-in — another data point, not a verdict.The more fundamental question is why an investor would buy either ETF instead of just holding the crypto directly. The main reasons are practical: these funds sit inside a regular brokerage account, which means no crypto wallet, no private key management, and no exchange risk. They're also eligible for tax-advantaged accounts like IRAs in a way that direct crypto holdings generally aren't. The downside is that you give up 24/7 trading, you can't move the underlying asset, and the 0.25% annual fee compounds over time — something a self-custodied wallet doesn't charge.Read NextMar 27, 2026 •By Eric TrieFBTC vs. ETHA: Is Bitcoin or Ethereum the Better Choice for Crypto Exposure?Apr 24, 2026 •By Seena HassounaSCHA vs. ISCB Comes Down to Sector Tilt and Your Drawdown ToleranceApr 24, 2026 •By Jeremy BowmanConsumer Sentiment Plunges To All-Time Lows on Iran War.

Why Are Markets At Record Highs?Apr 24, 2026 •By Seena HassounaWide Net or Narrow Bet: Choosing Your Staples ExposureApr 24, 2026 •By Emma NewberyStock Market Today, April 24: S&P 500 and Nasdaq Set New Highs on Tech SurgeStocks MentionediShares Ethereum Trust - iShares Ethereum Trust ETFNASDAQ: ETHA$17.52(+0.17%)+$0.03iShares Bitcoin TrustNASDAQ: IBIT$44.02(-0.07%)-$0.03*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Read Original

Source Information

Source: The Motley Fool