Back to News
quantum-computing

Which Coherence Decoheres? Basis-Dependent Decoherence Rates in Symmetry-Broken Collective Spin Systems

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A new study reveals that decoherence rates in symmetry-broken collective spin systems vary dramatically—by up to 2.42x—depending on whether quantum states are described in localized pointer bases or energy eigenbases. The discrepancy stems from parity constraints: energy eigenstates eliminate a cross-term that doubles decoherence in localized states, a phenomenon tied to the system’s ℤ₂ symmetry and Lindblad jump operators. Two protection factors are identified: η_MF ≈ 2.42 (mean-field advantage) and η_exact ≈ 1.86 (exact decay ratio), both linked to order parameters and spin correlations in the system. In the thermodynamic limit, the secular approximation breaks down, causing the energy doublet to degenerate and the decoherence rates to converge, resolving the basis-dependent discrepancy. Exact diagonalization of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model confirms these findings, demonstrating a three-regime structure governed by system size and quantum criticality.
Which Coherence Decoheres? Basis-Dependent Decoherence Rates in Symmetry-Broken Collective Spin Systems

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2605.00952 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 1 May 2026] Title:Which Coherence Decoheres? Basis-Dependent Decoherence Rates in Symmetry-Broken Collective Spin Systems Authors:Stavros Mouslopoulos View a PDF of the paper titled Which Coherence Decoheres? Basis-Dependent Decoherence Rates in Symmetry-Broken Collective Spin Systems, by Stavros Mouslopoulos View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:In the ordered phase of a $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetric collective spin system, two natural bases -- localised pointer states $\{|P\rangle,|R\rangle\}$ and energy eigenstates $\{|E_0\rangle,|E_1\rangle\}$ -- yield Lindblad dephasing rates that differ by a factor approaching $2$ as $N\to\infty$ and reaching $2.42$ near the quantum-critical crossover. The discrepancy has a single algebraic origin: parity forces $\langle E_i|\hat{J}_z|E_i\rangle=0$ exactly, eliminating the cross-term that doubles the localised-state rate. Two distinct protection factors are identified: $\eta_{\rm MF}=(Nm_*)^2/(2G_{01})\approx2.42$, where $m_*$ is the order parameter and $G_{01}=\frac{1}{2}(\langle E_0|\hat{J}_z^2|E_0\rangle+\langle E_1|\hat{J}_z^2|E_1\rangle)$ (advantage over the classical mean-field estimate), and $\eta_{\rm exact}=(G_{01}+J_{01}^2)/G_{01}\approx1.86$, where $J_{01}=\langle E_0|\hat{J}_z|E_1\rangle$ (exact physical ratio of pointer-state to eigenstate decay rate). In the thermodynamic limit the secular approximation fails, the doublet degenerates, and both rates converge. The three-regime structure is demonstrated in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model via exact diagonalisation, and the algebraic origin of the discrepancy is established via the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ parity of the Lindblad jump operator. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th) Cite as: arXiv:2605.00952 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2605.00952v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.00952 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Stavros Mouslopoulos Dr [view email] [v1] Fri, 1 May 2026 11:39:51 UTC (29 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Which Coherence Decoheres? Basis-Dependent Decoherence Rates in Symmetry-Broken Collective Spin Systems, by Stavros MouslopoulosView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: hep-th References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

energy-climate
partnership

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics