Back to News
quantum-computing

Universality classes split by strong and weak symmetries

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers Jongjun M. Lee, Myung-Joong Hwang, and Igor Boettcher demonstrate that weak and strong symmetries in dissipative quantum systems create fundamentally different universality classes, despite sharing the same closed-system symmetry group. The team used a squeezed-photon model with single- and two-photon losses to isolate weak and strong symmetries, revealing that while both exhibit identical Gaussian static fluctuations, their order parameters and decay rates scale distinctly. A one-loop Keldysh analysis combined with cumulant-expansion numerics showed sharp differences in critical scaling behavior tied to thermodynamic parameters, proving strong symmetries reshape dissipative criticality more profoundly than previously understood. The findings challenge assumptions that symmetries from closed systems directly translate to open quantum systems, establishing that dissipation strength alters universality classes even under identical symmetry origins. Published in February 2026, this work bridges quantum optics and condensed matter physics, offering quantitative evidence that symmetry strength—not just type—dictates phase transition behavior in dissipative environments.
Universality classes split by strong and weak symmetries

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2602.09090 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 9 Feb 2026] Title:Universality classes split by strong and weak symmetries Authors:Jongjun M. Lee, Myung-Joong Hwang, Igor Boettcher View a PDF of the paper titled Universality classes split by strong and weak symmetries, by Jongjun M. Lee and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Dissipative phase transitions are strongly shaped by the symmetries of the Liouvillian, yet the quantitative impact of weak and strong symmetries on critical behavior has remained unclear. We study a squeezed-photon model with single- and two-photon losses, realizing weak and strong symmetries in the simplest possible setting. The two symmetries exhibit identical Gaussian static fluctuations, whereas the order parameter and the asymptotic decay rate display distinct scaling behaviors. Our one-loop Keldysh analysis, together with cumulant-expansion numerics, reveals sharply different critical scaling with respect to the thermodynamic scaling parameter. This establishes that weak and strong symmetries lead to distinct dynamical universality classes despite originating from the same symmetry group in the closed system. Our results provide a clear quantitative demonstration that strong symmetries fundamentally reshape dissipative criticality. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics (cond-mat.mes-hall) Cite as: arXiv:2602.09090 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2602.09090v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.09090 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Jongjun M. Lee [view email] [v1] Mon, 9 Feb 2026 19:00:00 UTC (801 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Universality classes split by strong and weak symmetries, by Jongjun M. Lee and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-02 Change to browse by: cond-mat cond-mat.mes-hall References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics