Back to News
quantum-computing

Tight inapproximability of max-LINSAT and implications for decoded quantum interferometry

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers proved tight computational limits for max-LINSAT, showing no polynomial-time algorithm can exceed the random-assignment ratio of r/q by any constant under P≠NP, using a direct reduction from Håstad’s theorem. The study links this hardness threshold to decoded quantum interferometry (DQI), where DQI’s performance degrades to the same r/q bound as decodable structure vanishes, revealing a fundamental barrier for classical and quantum approaches alike. The findings establish that surpassing the r/q ratio requires exploiting instance-specific algebraic structure, distinguishing between worst-case hardness and potential quantum advantages in constraint satisfaction problems. The work connects classical complexity theory with quantum decoding limits, demonstrating that DQI’s semicircle law aligns precisely with max-LINSAT’s inapproximability when the decoding radius approaches zero. Authors Kramer, Schubert, and Eisert frame this as a boundary between intractability and quantum speedups, clarifying where classical algorithms fail and quantum methods might still offer gains.
Tight inapproximability of max-LINSAT and implications for decoded quantum interferometry

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2603.04540 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 4 Mar 2026] Title:Tight inapproximability of max-LINSAT and implications for decoded quantum interferometry Authors:Maximilian J. Kramer, Carsten Schubert, Jens Eisert View a PDF of the paper titled Tight inapproximability of max-LINSAT and implications for decoded quantum interferometry, by Maximilian J. Kramer and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We establish tight inapproximability bounds for max-LINSAT, the problem of maximizing the number of satisfied linear constraints over the finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$, where each constraint accepts $r$ values. Specifically, we prove by a direct reduction from Håstad's theorem that no polynomial-time algorithm can exceed the random-assignment ratio $r/q$ by any constant, assuming $\mathsf{P} \neq \mathsf{NP}$. This threshold coincides with the $\ell/m \to 0$ limit of the semicircle law governing decoded quantum interferometry (DQI), where $\ell$ is the decoding radius of the underlying code: as the decodable structure vanishes, DQI's approximation ratio degrades to exactly the worst-case bound established by our result. Together, these observations delineate the boundary between worst-case hardness and potential quantum advantage, showing that any algorithm surpassing $r/q$ must exploit algebraic structure specific to the instance. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Mathematical Physics (math-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2603.04540 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2603.04540v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.04540 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Jens Eisert [view email] [v1] Wed, 4 Mar 2026 19:26:26 UTC (406 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Tight inapproximability of max-LINSAT and implications for decoded quantum interferometry, by Maximilian J. Kramer and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: math math-ph math.MP References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-advantage

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics