Back to News
quantum-computing

A Thermodynamic SU(1,1) Witness Framework for Double-Quantum NMR Signals in Neural Tissue

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Christian Kerskens proposes a thermodynamic framework to detect quantum entanglement in neural tissue via double-quantum (DQ) NMR signals, addressing gaps in non-compact SU(1,1) dynamical systems where classical fluctuations lack bounds. The study establishes strict classical limits for DQ signals: spontaneous correlations cap at ~10⁻⁹ amplitude, while coherent amplification in tissue reaches only ~10⁻², creating a benchmark for "classically inexplicable" anomalies. Macroscopic DQ signals exceeding 10–15% fractional amplitude—under stable structural conditions (constant T₂)—are flagged as potential quantum signatures, per the derived thermodynamic witness criteria. Analysis of spin-bath interactions via quantum dynamical semigroups reveals transient pair correlations are contractively suppressed, reinforcing the framework’s ability to distinguish quantum from classical noise in biological systems. This work bridges quantum information theory and neuroscience, offering a rigorous method to test macroscopic quantum effects in neural tissue using experimentally verifiable NMR constraints.
A Thermodynamic SU(1,1) Witness Framework for Double-Quantum NMR Signals in Neural Tissue

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2604.07641 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 8 Apr 2026] Title:A Thermodynamic SU(1,1) Witness Framework for Double-Quantum NMR Signals in Neural Tissue Authors:Christian Kerskens View a PDF of the paper titled A Thermodynamic SU(1,1) Witness Framework for Double-Quantum NMR Signals in Neural Tissue, by Christian Kerskens View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Entanglement criteria based on variances or Fisher information are well developed for compact collective spin algebras, but their extension to non-compact dynamical sectors is less straightforward. In particular, double-quantum (DQ) observables associated with effective SU(1,1) structures can lead to formally unbounded classical fluctuation estimates unless additional physical constraints are imposed. In this note, we develop a thermodynamic witness framework in which the classically accessible fluctuation sector is strictly bounded by finite-temperature detailed-balance conditions and motionally narrowed sequence-transfer limits. By analyzing the quantum dynamical semigroup of the spin-bath interaction, we demonstrate that spontaneous transient pair correlations generated by a stationary incoherent bath are contractively capped near an amplitude of \(10^{-9}\). Furthermore, classical coherent sequence amplification is empirically bounded to \(\mathcal{O}(10^{-2})\) in motionally narrowed tissue. The resulting functional provides a concrete, theoretically derived bounding framework against which macroscopic DQ anomalies (e.g., fractional amplitudes on the order of \(10\%\) to \(15\%\)) can be rigorously classified as classically inexplicable, provided macro-scale structural stability (constant \(T_2^*\)) is empirically verified. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2604.07641 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2604.07641v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.07641 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Christian M. Kerskens [view email] [v1] Wed, 8 Apr 2026 23:01:36 UTC (9 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled A Thermodynamic SU(1,1) Witness Framework for Double-Quantum NMR Signals in Neural Tissue, by Christian KerskensView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-04 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

government-funding

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics