Texture-dependent all-optical switching in ferromagnetic films via stochastic nucleation of nanoscale domains

Nature Materials (2026)Cite this article Controlling magnetic textures at ever smaller length scales and timescales is of fundamental and technological interest. External stimuli capable of acting at the nanoscale pose a challenge, motivating alternative approaches that exploit the intrinsic inhomogeneity of magnetic textures. Here we use a Pt/Co/Pt ferromagnetic thin film to investigate magnetization reversal with circularly polarized picosecond laser pulses. Magnetic force microscopy reveals stochastic nucleation of complex nanotextured domains from an initial monodomain state. Subsequent illumination of these domains with laser pulses induces deterministic and homogeneous magnetization switching. We find that the domain growth depends on the complexity of the texture, revealing a helicity- and texture-dependent mechanism that contrasts with temperature-gradient-driven domain expansion. We complement our observations with a stochastic model in which domain nucleation is governed by light helicity and the local magnetic environment. These results provide an insight into the mechanism of multipulse helicity-dependent all-optical switching.This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel any timeSubscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $259.00 per yearonly $21.58 per issueBuy this articleUSD 39.95Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkoutThe data that support the findings of this work are available at https://doi.org/10.34973/6j6t-pd76 (ref. 54). Source data are provided with this paper. All other data that support the findings of this paper are available from the corresponding author upon request.Collet, E. et al. Laser-induced ferroelectric structural order in an organic charge-transfer crystal. Science 300, 612–615 (2003).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Beaud, P. et al. A time-dependent order parameter for ultrafast photoinduced phase transitions. Nat. Mater. 13, 923–927 (2014).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Wall, S. et al. Ultrafast disordering of vanadium dimers in photoexcited VO2. Science 362, 572–576 (2018).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Stoica, V. A. et al. Non-equilibrium pathways to emergent polar supertextures. Nat. Mater. 23, 1394–1401 (2024).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Nova, T. F., Disa, A. S., Fechner, M. & Cavalleri, A. Metastable ferroelectricity in optically strained SrTiO3. Science 364, 1075–1079 (2019).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Li, X. et al. Terahertz field–induced ferroelectricity in quantum paraelectric SrTiO3. Science 364, 1079–1082 (2019).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Gedik, N., Yang, D.-S., Logvenov, G., Bozovic, I. & Zewail, A. H. Nonequilibrium phase transitions in electron crystallography. Science 316, 425–429 (2007).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Demsar, J., Podobnik, B., Kabanov, V. V., Wolf, T. H. & Mihailovic, D. Superconducting gap Δc, the pseudogap Δ⁢p, and pair fluctuations above Tc in overdoped Y⁢1−x⁢Ca⁢x⁢Ba⁢2Cu⁢3⁢O⁢7−δ from femtosecond time-domain spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4918–4921 (1999).Article CAS Google Scholar Boschini, F. et al. Collapse of superconductivity in cuprates via ultrafast quenching of phase coherence. Nat. Mater. 17, 416–420 (2018).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Wandel, S. et al. Enhanced charge density wave coherence in a light-quenched, high-temperature superconductor. Science 376, 860–864 (2022).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Fava, S. et al. Magnetic field expulsion in optically driven YBa2Cu3O6.48. Nature 632, 75–80 (2024).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Beaurepaire, E., Merle, J.-C., Daunois, A. & Bigot, J.-Y. Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4250–4253 (1996).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Radu, I. et al. Transient ferromagnetic-like state mediating ultrafast reversal of antiferromagnetically coupled spins. Nature 472, 205–208 (2011).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Büttner, F. et al. Observation of fluctuation-mediated picosecond nucleation of a topological phase. Nat. Mater. 20, 30–37 (2021).Article PubMed Google Scholar Kirilyuk, A., Kimel, A. V. & Rasing, T. Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731–2784 (2010).Article Google Scholar Li, G. et al. Ultrafast kinetics of the antiferromagnetic-ferromagnetic phase transition in FeRh. Nat. Commun. 13, 2998 (2022).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Blank, T. G. H. et al. Empowering control of antiferromagnets by THz-induced spin coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 096701 (2023).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Afanasiev, D. et al. Ultrafast control of magnetic interactions via light-driven phonons. Nat. Mater. 20, 607–611 (2021).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Davies, C. S. et al. Anomalously damped heat-assisted route for precessional magnetization reversal in an iron garnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 027202 (2019).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Liu, M. et al. Terahertz-field-induced insulator-to-metal transition in vanadium dioxide metamaterial. Nature 487, 345–348 (2012).de Jong, S. et al. Speed limit of the insulator–metal transition in magnetite. Nat. Mater. 12, 882–886 (2013).Article PubMed Google Scholar Mankowsky, R., Von Hoegen, A., Först, M. & Cavalleri, A. Ultrafast reversal of the ferroelectric polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 197601 (2017).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Stojchevska, L. et al. Ultrafast switching to a stable hidden quantum state in an electronic crystal. Science 344, 177–180 (2014).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Ravnik, J. et al. A time-domain phase diagram of metastable states in a charge ordered quantum material. Nat. Commun. 12, 2323 (2021).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Johnson, A. S. et al. All-optical seeding of a light-induced phase transition with correlated disorder. Nat. Phys. 20, 970–975 (2024).Article CAS Google Scholar Kimel, A. V. et al. Ultrafast non-thermal control of magnetization by instantaneous photomagnetic pulses. Nature 435, 655–657 (2005).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Hansteen, F., Kimel, A., Kirilyuk, A. & Rasing, T. Femtosecond photomagnetic switching of spins in ferrimagnetic garnet films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 047402 (2005).Article PubMed Google Scholar de Jong, J. A. et al. Coherent control of the route of an ultrafast magnetic phase transition via low-amplitude spin precession. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 157601 (2012).Article PubMed Google Scholar Lambert, C.-H. et al. All-optical control of ferromagnetic thin films and nanostructures. Science 345, 1337–1340 (2014).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Kichin, G. et al. From multiple- to single-pulse all-optical helicity-dependent switching in ferromagnetic Co/Pt multilayers. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 024019 (2019).Article CAS Google Scholar Gorchon, J., Yang, Y. & Bokor, J. Model for multishot all-thermal all-optical switching in ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 94, 020409 (2016).Article Google Scholar Ellis, M. O. A., Fullerton, E. E. & Chantrell, R. W. All-optical switching in granular ferromagnets caused by magnetic circular dichroism. Sci. Rep. 6, 30522 (2016).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Medapalli, R. et al. Multiscale dynamics of helicity-dependent all-optical magnetization reversal in ferromagnetic Co/Pt multilayers. Phys. Rev. B 96, 224421 (2017).Article Google Scholar Quessab, Y. et al. Helicity-dependent all-optical domain wall motion in ferromagnetic thin films. Phys. Rev. B 97, 054419 (2018).Article CAS Google Scholar Yamada, K. T. et al. Efficient all-optical helicity dependent switching of spins in a Pt/Co/Pt film by a dual-pulse excitation. Front. Nanotechnol. 4, 765848 (2022).Janda, T. et al. Inertial displacement of a domain wall excited by ultra-short circularly polarized laser pulses. Nat. Commun. 8, 15226 (2017).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Parlak, U., Adam, R., Bürgler, D. E., Gang, S. & Schneider, C. M. Optically induced magnetization reversal in [Co/Pt] multilayers: role of domain wall dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 98, 214443 (2018).Article CAS Google Scholar Je, S.-G. et al. Creation of magnetic skyrmion bubble lattices by ultrafast laser in ultrathin films. Nano Lett. 18, 7362–7371 (2018).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Kazakova, O. et al. Frontiers of magnetic force microscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 125, 060901 (2019).Schwarz, A. & Wiesendanger, R. Magnetic sensitive force microscopy. Nano Today 3, 28–39 (2008).Article CAS Google Scholar Huo, S. et al. Micromagnetic and MFM studies of a domain wall in thick 110 FeSi. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 190, 17–27 (1998).Article CAS Google Scholar Okuno, T., Shigeto, K., Ono, T., Mibu, K. & Shinjo, T. MFM study of magnetic vortex cores in circular permalloy dots: behavior in external field. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 240, 1–6 (2002).Article CAS Google Scholar Hrabec, A. et al. Measuring and tailoring the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in perpendicularly magnetized thin films. Phys. Rev. B 90, 020402 (2014).Article CAS Google Scholar Casiraghi, A. et al. Individual skyrmion manipulation by local magnetic field gradients. Commun. Phys. 2, 145 (2019).Article Google Scholar Bhukta, M. et al. Homochiral antiferromagnetic merons, antimerons and bimerons realized in synthetic antiferromagnets. Nat. Commun. 15, 1641 (2024).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Peng, Y. et al. In-plane reorientation induced single laser pulse magnetization reversal. Nat. Commun. 14, 5000 (2023).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Berritta, M., Mondal, R., Carva, K. & Oppeneer, P. M. Ab initio theory of coherent laser-induced magnetization in metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 137203 (2016).Article PubMed Google Scholar John, R. et al. Magnetisation switching of FePt nanoparticle recording medium by femtosecond laser pulses. Sci. Rep. 7, 4114 (2017).Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar El Hadri, M. S. et al. Two types of all-optical magnetization switching mechanisms using femtosecond laser pulses. Phys. Rev. B 94, 064412 (2016).Article Google Scholar Lisovskii, F. V., Lukashenko, L. I. & Mansvetova, E. G. Thermodynamically stable fractal-like domain structures in magnetic films. JETP Lett. 79, 352–354 (2004).Article CAS Google Scholar Pylypovskyi, O. V. et al. Interaction of domain walls with grain boundaries in uniaxial insulating antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 014020 (2023).Article CAS Google Scholar Möhrke, P., Rhensius, J., Thiele, J.-U., Heyderman, L. J. & Kläui, M. Tailoring laser-induced domain wall pinning.

Solid State Commun. 150, 489–491 (2010).Article Google Scholar Yamada, K. T. et al. Magnetization reversal of a ferromagnetic Pt/Co/Pt film by helicity dependent absorption of visible to near-infrared laser pulses. Phys. Rev. B 111, L020406 (2025).Article CAS Google Scholar Khusyainov, D. et al. Texture-dependent all-optical switching in ferromagnetic films via stochastic nucleation of nanoscale domains.

Radboud Data Repository https://doi.org/10.34973/6j6t-pd76 (2025).Article Google Scholar Download referencesWe thank N. Kiselev, D. Grundler, R. Medapalli and L. Körber for fruitful discussions and K. Saeedi and C. Berkhout for their technical support. Additionally, we would like to thank N. Khokhlov, V. Bilyk, L. Nowak and J. Hintermayr for their assistance with the building of the experimental setup. This work was funded by European Research Council (ERC) grant 101078206 ASTRAL, the European Union Horizon 2020 innovation programme under the ERC grant agreement number 856538 (3D-MAGiC), the European Union Horizon 2020 innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement number 861300 (COMRAD), and the Gravitation program of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) under the research program ‘Materials for the Quantum Age’ (QuMat) registration number 024.005.006. F.K. and M.K. acknowledge funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) TRR 173/2 Spin+X no. 268565370 (Projects A01, A12 and B02). M.N. acknowledges support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) PDF fellowship. R.V.M. acknowledges support from the ERC grant agreement number 852050 (MAGSHAKE). J.H.M. acknowledges funding from the VIDI project number 223.157 (CHASEMAG). J.H.M. and M.K. acknowledge the Horizon Europe Framework Programme of the European Commission under project number 101070290 (NIMFEIA) and, with T.R., also the KIC project number 22016, which are partly financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).Radboud University, Institute for Molecules and Materials, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsDinar Khusyainov, Rein Liefferink, MengXing Na, Dmytro Afanasiev, Alexey V. Kimel, Johan H. Mentink & Theo RasingInstitute of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, GermanyFabian Kammerbauer, Robert Frömter & Mathias KläuiNT-MDT BV, Apeldoorn, The NetherlandsDmitry KozodaevDepartment of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UKNikolay Vovk & Rostislav V. MikhaylovskiySearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarD.A., J.H.M., A.V.K. and T.R. conceived the project. D.A., J.H.M., A.V.K. and T.R. supervised the study. D. Khusyainov and D. Kozodaev designed and built the experimental setup. D. Khusyainov and N.V. performed the experiments. F.K., R.F. and M.K. fabricated the samples. D. Khusyainov analysed and interpreted the results of the MFM and magneto-optical experiments. D. Khusyainov and M.N. prepared the figures. R.L. and J.H.M. provided the theoretical model. R.L. carried out the simulations. D. Khusyainov, R.L., M.N., R.V.M., J.H.M., D.A., A.V.K. and T.R. wrote the original draft with feedback from all co-authors.Correspondence to Dinar Khusyainov.The authors declare no competing interests.Nature Materials thanks Sascha Feldmann and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.The hysteresis loop is measured by observing the Faraday rotation in response to changes in an applied magnetic field.Magneto-optical image of two domains with M=1 and M=−1 after sweeping with a laser beam with σ−, σ+, and linearly polarized light (LP). Image shows that to switch magnetization from M=1 to M=−1 (M=−1 to M=1), σ− (σ+) pulses are necessary. The scale bar is 100 µm.Top: In Faraday microscopy, linearly polarized light passes through a polarizer, the magnetic sample, a 10× objective, and an analyzer before being detected by a CCD camera. Circularly polarized laser pulses (σ) induce nanotextured magnetic domains in the sample. Laser-induced magnetic domains induce Faraday rotation of the light polarization, producing a magneto-optical image (right). Bottom: In MFM, a magnetized tip scans above the sample surface to detect magnetic stray fields coming from the nanotextured domains, yielding a high-resolution MFM image (right). Representative magneto-optical and MFM images illustrate the differences in spatial resolution between the two techniques. The scale bar is 5 µm.(a) Magneto-optical images of the magnetization after illumination with σ laser pulses as a function of the number of pulses and fluence. Magneto-optical images were obtained using magneto-optical Faraday microscopy. Images were post-processed by removing the background. The images of the monodomain state, unaffected by laser pulses, are replaced by a uniform yellow background. The scale bar is 15 µm. (b) Diagram of the average magnetization after laser illumination inside the switched spot as a function of the number of pulses and fluence. Dots represent the MFM sampled images in deterministic (white) and mixed states (black) displayed in (c). The scale bars in (c) are 5 µm.(a) Binary MFM image of the sample after illumination with 4 pulses. (b) Graph of the logarithm of box size plotted against the logarithm of box number with a linear fit showing a value for D = 1.17±0.04.(a) MFM images of the laser-induced stochastic domain networks as a function of the number of pulses N at a fluence of F = 2.26 mJ/cm2. The white shadow indicates progress in the deterministic state formation. The lower panel shows the result of the simulations using a probabilistic energy barrier-based model, including and excluding heat accumulation. We see that heat accumulation doesn’t affect the formation of the homogeneously switched domain at a low number of pulses. Heat accumulation was implemented in the model as an exponential growth of the base temperature from \({T}_{0}\)= 0.2E0/kB to \({T}_{0}\)= 0.5E0/kB saturating at ~100 pulses. The scale bars are 5 µm. (b) The normalized switched area As/Ab (gray) and the fractal dimension D (red) as a function of the incident number of circularly polarized laser pulses N, calculated from the experiment and simulations, respectively. As/Ab and D in experiment (simulations) are presented as mean values ± s.d (s.e.m). The experiment has been repeated 3 times for the whole range of numbers of pulses. We ran the simulation 50 times from 0 to 10 pulses, 3 times in the range 100 to 1000 pulses, and 1 time for 10000 pulses. We use only the outer domain wall to estimate the fractal dimension of the deterministic part in the mixed state. The switched area increases linearly up to ten pulses and then saturates after 100 pulses, followed by a slow growth, as observed in the experiment and simulation. In D, we observe a rapid increase to D ~ 1.24 (1.17) from 0 to 6(7) pulses, followed by a plateau from 6(7) to 100(10), and a decrease to D ~ 1.15 (1.11) from 100(10) to 10K pulses for experiments (simulations).Source data(a) MFM images of the single-pulse nucleated domains as a function of pulse fluence for left (σ−) and right (σ+) circularly polarized laser pulses. We observe that the threshold for small domains is Fσ− =2.57 mJ/cm2 for σ− pulses, while for σ+ pulses, the critical threshold fluence is Fσ+ =2.7 mJ/cm2. The difference between Fσ+ and Fσ− confirms that the absorption of σ+ and σ− pulses is inequivalent, which can be attributed to the MCD effect. The scale bar is 5 µm. (b-c) Switched area (b) and fractal dimension (c) as a function of fluence for the domain networks. Extracted an MCD-induced shift in As/Ab as the function of fluence is approximately 3%. Fractal dimension D also exhibits an MCD effect but with a slightly smaller induced shift of approximately 1.5%. Solid lines in (b,c) serve as a guide for the eye.An MFM image of the laser-induced stochastic domain network was obtained after illumination with six pulses. The zoom-in panel shows the smallest magnetic domain. The line profile was fitted with a Gaussian distribution. The domain size is about 235 nm (Full width at half-maximum). The scale bar is 5 µm.(a) MFM images of the laser-induced nanosized domain networks as a function of the number of σ− and LP pulses. Fluence was fixed at a value of about 2.5 mJ/cm2. (b) Simulated images of the laser-induced domains with and without the contribution of the MCD effect. The scale bar is 5 µm.Supplementary Materials 1–6 and Figs. 1–8.Statistical source data.Statistical source data.Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.Reprints and permissionsKhusyainov, D., Liefferink, R., Na, M. et al. Texture-dependent all-optical switching in ferromagnetic films via stochastic nucleation of nanoscale domains. Nat. Mater. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-026-02515-8Download citationReceived: 16 December 2024Accepted: 26 January 2026Published: 03 March 2026Version of record: 03 March 2026DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-026-02515-8Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative