Back to News
quantum-computing

(stupid) question about FTL

Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)
Loading...
2 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A Reddit user proposed a theoretical faster-than-light (FTL) communication method using entangled quantum computers split across vast distances, exploiting decoherence to transmit binary signals. The scheme involves pre-agreed timing: one party intentionally decoheres their half to send "True," while inaction sends "False," with results detected instantly via computational errors. The flaw lies in quantum no-communication theorems, which prohibit using entanglement alone to transmit information, as decoherence on one system doesn’t deterministically affect its entangled partner. The user’s background in computer science—lacking quantum physics foundations—led to misunderstanding entanglement’s non-local correlations, which cannot convey data faster than light. Experts would clarify that while entanglement enables instantaneous state correlation, measuring or manipulating one system doesn’t allow controllable, observable information transfer to the other.
(stupid) question about FTL

Summarize this article with:

here's something I don't understand. and this will seem really stupid and I know I am wrong, so I am not trying to argue something stupid, I just want to get where my understanding fails: I have thought of a method of actually transmitting information FTL and I cannot see during what step it doesn't work. So think of a simple quantum computer that has only one task to compute some basic quantum algorithm or whatever. my understanding is that sometimes, this computation can just break due to accidental decoherence. can that not be used to transmit information? here's my scenario: we have a quantum computer entangled with another quantum computer. I don't care whether that can be created using current tech or anything, just imagine a quantum computer was split in two. then we take one of the halves and fly it across the galaxy 1 light year away. doesn't matter how or anything, and let's assume it doesn't lose coherence. we discuss beforehand that after X time, one person will perform that quantum algorithm on one of the halves, and the other will intentionally decohere it at that exact time discussed beforehand if he wished to send a "True" message, or not do anything if he wishes to send a "False" message. so a simple boolean message sent FTL, and the way it is received is instant: we know what algorithm the computer does and what the input is: if the output is correct = no decoherence = False, if output is wrong or gibberish = decoherence = True. where am I mistaking? and just to make it clear again, I am asking this because I have recently started learning basic stuff about quantum computers and I want to understand what am I misunderstanding. I come from computer science not physics. Thanks submitted by /u/Royal_Plate2092 [link] [comments]

Read Original

Tags

government-funding
quantum-computing
quantum-algorithms

Source Information

Source: Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)