Back to News
quantum-computing

State preparation with parallel-sequential circuits

Quantum Journal
Loading...
20 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers Zhi-Yuan Wei and Daniel Malz introduced parallel-sequential (PS) circuits, a novel quantum circuit architecture bridging brickwall and sequential designs, offering tunable control over entanglement and correlation range trade-offs. Numerical simulations demonstrate PS circuits efficiently prepare one-dimensional many-body ground states, outperforming existing methods like brickwall, sequential, and log-depth circuits in noisy environments with idling and two-qubit gate errors. On noisy quantum devices, PS circuits show superior performance across a broad parameter range, reducing error proliferation compared to conventional approaches, making them ideal for near-term quantum applications. When used as a variational ansatz, noisy random PS circuits exhibit enhanced trainability, addressing a key challenge in variational quantum algorithms by mitigating barren plateaus and improving optimization convergence. The work provides a practical framework for improving quantum state preparation, error resilience, and algorithmic efficiency on current and near-future noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices.
State preparation with parallel-sequential circuits

Summarize this article with:

AbstractWe introduce parallel-sequential (PS) circuits, a family of quantum circuit layouts that interpolate between brickwall and sequential circuits, which introduces control parameters governing a trade-off between the amount of entanglement and the maximum correlation range they can express. We provide numerical evidence that PS circuits can efficiently prepare many-body ground states in one dimension. On noisy devices, characterized through both idling errors and two-qubit gate errors, we show that in a wide parameter regime, PS circuits outperform brickwall, sequential, and the log-depth circuits from [Malz, Styliaris, Wei, Cirac, PRL 132, 040404 (2024)]. Additionally, we demonstrate that properly chosen noisy random PS circuits suppress error proliferation and, when employed as a variational ansatz, exhibit superior trainability.Popular summaryWe introduce parallel-sequential (PS) circuits, a class of quantum circuit layouts that unify and generalize brickwall and sequential circuits across arbitrary dimensions. Focusing on one-dimensional systems, we demonstrate that PS circuits efficiently prepare various classes of many-body ground states. Due to their optimized structure, we find that PS circuits outperform brickwall and sequential circuits on noisy quantum devices. Furthermore, appropriately selected noisy random PS circuits exhibit suppressed error proliferation, and superior trainability when used variationally. Our work thus offers a versatile and practically accessible strategy to improve performance across a wide array of quantum tasks on noisy quantum devices.► BibTeX data@article{Wei2026statepreparation, doi = {10.22331/q-2026-04-21-2079}, url = {https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2026-04-21-2079}, title = {State preparation with parallel-sequential circuits}, author = {Wei, Zhi-Yuan and Malz, Daniel}, journal = {{Quantum}}, issn = {2521-327X}, publisher = {{Verein zur F{\"{o}}rderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften}}, volume = {10}, pages = {2079}, month = apr, year = {2026} }► References [1] M A Nielsenand I L Chuang ``Quantum computation and quantum information'' Cambridge University Press (2000). [2] Guifré Vidal ``Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems'' Physical Review Letters 93, 1–4 (2004). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.93.040502 [3] C. Schön, E. Solano, F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, and M. M. Wolf, ``Sequential generation of entangled multiqubit states'' Physical Review Letters 95, 1–4 (2005). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.95.110503 [4] M. C. Bañuls, D. Pérez-García, M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, ``Sequentially generated states for the study of two-dimensional systems'' Physical Review A 77, 1–9 (2008). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.77.052306 [5] Michael P.

Zaleteland Frank Pollmann ``Isometric Tensor Network States in Two Dimensions'' Physical Review Letters 124, 37201 (2020). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.124.037201 [6] Zhi Yuan Wei, Daniel Malz, and J Ignacio Cirac, ``Sequential Generation of Projected Entangled-Pair States'' Physical Review Letters 128, 1–14 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.128.010607 [7] Yu-Jie Liu, Kirill Shtengel, Adam Smith, and Frank Pollmann, ``Methods for Simulating String-Net States and Anyons on a Digital Quantum Computer'' PRX Quantum 3, 040315 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.3.040315 [8] Xie Chen, Arpit Dua, Michael Hermele, David T Stephen, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Robijn Vanhove, and Jing-Yu Zhao, ``Sequential quantum circuits as maps between gapped phases'' Physical Review B 109, 075116 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.109.075116 [9] Y. Y. Shi, L. M. Duan, and G Vidal, ``Classical simulation of quantum many-body systems with a tree tensor network'' Physical Review A 74, 1–4 (2006). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.74.022320 [10] Adam Smith, Bernhard Jobst, Andrew G Green, and Frank Pollmann, ``Crossing a topological phase transition with a quantum computer'' Physical Review Research 4, L022020 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.4.L022020 [11] Shi Ju Ran ``Encoding of matrix product states into quantum circuits of one- A nd two-qubit gates'' Physical Review A 101, 1–7 (2020). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.101.032310 [12] Sheng-Hsuan Lin, Rohit Dilip, Andrew G Green, Adam Smith, and Frank Pollmann, ``Real-and imaginary-time evolution with compressed quantum circuits'' PRX Quantum 2, 10342 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.2.010342 [13] Reza Haghshenas, Johnnie Gray, Andrew C Potter, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, ``Variational power of quantum circuit tensor networks'' Physical Review X 12, 11047 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.12.011047 [14] Manuel S Rudolph, Jing Chen, Jacob Miller, Atithi Acharya, and Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz, ``Decomposition of matrix product states into shallow quantum circuits'' Quantum Science and Technology 9, 015012 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​ad04e6 [15] Marco Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, Ryan Babbush, Simon C Benjamin, Suguru Endo, Keisuke Fujii, Jarrod R McClean, Kosuke Mitarai, Xiao Yuan, Lukasz Cincio, and Others, ``Variational quantum algorithms'' Nature Reviews Physics 3, 625–644 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s42254-021-00348-9 [16] Kishor Bharti, Alba Cervera-Lierta, Thi Ha Kyaw, Tobias Haug, Sumner Alperin-Lea, Abhinav Anand, Matthias Degroote, Hermanni Heimonen, Jakob S Kottmann, Tim Menke, and Others, ``Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms'' Reviews of Modern Physics 94, 15004 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.94.015004 [17] Jules Tilly, Hongxiang Chen, Shuxiang Cao, Dario Picozzi, Kanav Setia, Ying Li, Edward Grant, Leonard Wossnig, Ivan Rungger, and George H Booth, ``The variational quantum eigensolver: a review of methods and best practices'' Physics Reports 986, 1–128 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.physrep.2022.08.003 [18] Matthew B Hastings ``An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems'' Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, P08024 (2007). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1742-5468/​2007/​08/​P08024 [19] Jens Eisert, Marcus Cramer, and Martin B Plenio, ``Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy'' Reviews of modern physics 82, 277 (2010). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.82.277 [20] M. B. Hastings ``Locality in Quantum and Markov Dynamics on Lattices and Networks'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 140402 (2004). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.93.140402 [21] Daniel Malz, Georgios Styliaris, Zhi-Yuan Wei, and J Ignacio Cirac, ``Preparation of matrix product states with log-depth quantum circuits'' Physical Review Letters 132, 040404 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.132.040404 [22] Silvano Garnerone, Thiago R de Oliveira, Stephan Haas, and Paolo Zanardi, ``Statistical properties of random matrix product states'' Physical Review A 82, 052312 (2010). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.82.052312 [23] Jonas Haferkamp, Christian Bertoni, Ingo Roth, and Jens Eisert, ``Emergent statistical mechanics from properties of disordered random matrix product states'' PRX Quantum 2, 40308 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.2.040308 [24] Cécilia Lancienand David Pérez-Garcia ``Correlation length in random MPS and PEPS'' Annales Henri Poincaré 23, 141–222 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00023-021-01087-4 [25] D Perez-Garcia, F Verstraete, M M Wolf, and J I Cirac, ``Matrix Product State Representations'' Quantum Info. Comput. 7, 401–430 (2007). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.26421/​QIC7.5-6-1 [26] Michael M. Wolf, Gerardo Ortiz, Frank Verstraete, and J. Ignacio Cirac, ``Quantum phase transitions in matrix product systems'' Physical Review Letters 97, 1–4 (2006). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.97.110403 [27] Carlos Bravo-Prieto, Josep Lumbreras-Zarapico, Luca Tagliacozzo, and José I. Latorre, ``Scaling of variational quantum circuit depth for condensed matter systems'' Quantum 4 (2020). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2020-05-28-272 [28] Mohsin Iqbal, David Muñoz Ramo, and Henrik Dreyer, ``Preentangling Quantum Algorithms–the Density Matrix Renormalization Group-assisted Quantum Canonical Transformation'' arXiv:2209.07106 (2022). https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​2209.07106 [29] Prithvi Gundlapalliand Junyi Lee ``Deterministic and entanglement-efficient preparation of amplitude-encoded quantum registers'' Physical Review Applied 18, 024013 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevApplied.18.024013 [30] Ar A Melnikov, Alena A Termanova, Sergey V Dolgov, Florian Neukart, and MR Perelshtein, ``Quantum state preparation using tensor networks'' Quantum Science and Technology 8, 035027 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​acd9e7 [31] Jason Iaconis, Sonika Johri, and Elton Yechao Zhu, ``Quantum state preparation of normal distributions using matrix product states'' npj Quantum Information 10, 15 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41534-024-00805-0 [32] Vladyslav Bohun, Illia Lukin, Mykola Luhanko, Georgios Korpas, Philippe JS De Brouwer, Mykola Maksymenko, and Maciej Koch-Janusz, ``Scalable and shallow quantum circuits encoding probability distributions informed by asymptotic entanglement analysis'' arXiv:2412.05202 (2024). https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​2412.05202 [33] Javier Gonzalez-Conde, Thomas W Watts, Pablo Rodriguez-Grasa, and Mikel Sanz, ``Efficient quantum amplitude encoding of polynomial functions'' Quantum 8, 1297 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2024-03-21-1297 [34] Yuichi Sanoand Ikko Hamamura ``Quantum State Preparation for Probability Distributions with Mirror Symmetry Using Matrix Product States'' arXiv:2403.16729 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​yqj3-hyxv https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​2403.16729 [35] Peng-Fei Zhou, Rui Hong, and Shi-Ju Ran, ``Automatically differentiable quantum circuit for many-qubit state preparation'' Phys. Rev. A 104, 042601 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.104.042601 [36] Glen Evenblyand Guifré Vidal ``Algorithms for entanglement renormalization'' Physical Review B 79, 144108 (2009). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.79.144108 [37] Akel Hashim, Ravi K. Naik, Alexis Morvan, Jean-Loup Ville, Bradley Mitchell, John Mark Kreikebaum, Marc Davis, Ethan Smith, Costin Iancu, Kevin P. O'Brien, Ian Hincks, Joel J. Wallman, Joseph Emerson, and Irfan Siddiqi, ``Randomized Compiling for Scalable Quantum Computing on a Noisy Superconducting Quantum Processor'' Phys. Rev. X 11, 041039 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.11.041039 [38] Simon J Evered, Dolev Bluvstein, Marcin Kalinowski, Sepehr Ebadi, Tom Manovitz, Hengyun Zhou, Sophie H Li, Alexandra A Geim, Tout T Wang, and Nishad Maskara, ``High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer'' Nature 622, 268–272 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-023-06481-y [39] Steven A Moses, Charles H Baldwin, Michael S Allman, R Ancona, L Ascarrunz, C Barnes, J Bartolotta, B Bjork, P Blanchard, and M Bohn, ``A race-track trapped-ion quantum processor'' Physical Review X 13, 041052 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.13.041052 [40] Rajeev Acharya, Laleh Aghababaie-Beni, Igor Aleiner, Trond I Andersen, Markus Ansmann, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Abraham Asfaw, Nikita Astrakhantsev, and Juan Atalaya, ``Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold'' arXiv:2408.13687 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-024-08449-y https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​2408.13687 [41] Marco Cerezo, Akira Sone, Tyler Volkoff, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J Coles, ``Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits'' Nature communications 12, 1–12 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-021-21728-w [42] Hao-Kai Zhang, Shuo Liu, and Shi-Xin Zhang, ``Absence of barren plateaus in finite local-depth circuits with long-range entanglement'' Physical Review Letters 132, 150603 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.132.150603 [43] Samson Wang, Enrico Fontana, Marco Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Akira Sone, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J Coles, ``Noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms'' Nature communications 12, 1–11 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-021-27045-6 [44] Guillermo González-García, Rahul Trivedi, and J. Ignacio Cirac, ``Error Propagation in NISQ Devices for Solving Classical Optimization Problems'' PRX Quantum 3, 040326 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.3.040326 [45] Sergio Boixo, Sergei V. Isakov, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, Nan Ding, Zhang Jiang, Michael J. Bremner, John M. Martinis, and Hartmut Neven, ``Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices'' Nature Physics 14, 595–600 (2018). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41567-018-0124-x [46] Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Ryan Babbush, Dave Bacon, Joseph C Bardin, Rami Barends, Rupak Biswas, Sergio Boixo, Fernando GSL Brandao, and David A Buell, ``Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor'' nature 574, 505–510 (2019). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-019-1666-5 [47] Fernando G S L Brandão, Wissam Chemissany, Nicholas Hunter-Jones, Richard Kueng, and John Preskill, ``Models of quantum complexity growth'' PRX Quantum 2, 30316 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.2.030316 [48] Dominik Hangleiterand Jens Eisert ``Computational advantage of quantum random sampling'' Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 035001 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.95.035001 [49] Hans J Briegel, David E Browne, Wolfgang Dür, Robert Raussendorf, and Maarten Van den Nest, ``Measurement-based quantum computation'' Nature Physics 5, 19–26 (2009). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nphys1157 [50] Matthew B Hastingsand Tohru Koma ``Spectral gap and exponential decay of correlations'' Communications in mathematical physics 265, 781–804 (2006). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00220-006-0030-4 [51] Jaš Bensaand Marko Žnidarič ``Fastest local entanglement scrambler, multistage thermalization, and a non-Hermitian phantom'' Physical Review X 11, 031019 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.11.031019 [52] Harper R. Grimsley, Sophia E. Economou, Edwin Barnes, and Nicholas J. Mayhall, ``An adaptive variational algorithm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer'' Nature Communications 10 (2019). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-019-10988-2 [53] Matthew Fishman, Steven White, and Edwin Stoudenmire, ``The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations'' SciPost Physics Codebases 004 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.21468/​SciPostPhysCodeb.4 [54] Giacomo Torlaiand Matthew Fishman ``PastaQ: A Package for Simulation, Tomography and Analysis of Quantum Computers'' (2020). https:/​/​github.com/​GTorlai/​PastaQ.jl/​ [55] Ulrich Schollwöck ``The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states'' Annals of Physics 326, 96–192 (2011). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2010.09.012 [56] C. Schön, K. Hammerer, M. M. Wolf, J. I. Cirac, and E. Solano, ``Sequential generation of matrix-product states in cavity QED'' Physical Review A 75, 1–10 (2007). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.75.032311 [57] Zhi-Yuan Wei, Daniel Malz, and J Ignacio Cirac, ``Efficient adiabatic preparation of tensor network states'' Physical Review Research 5, L022037 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.5.L022037 [58] Raban Iten, Roger Colbeck, Ivan Kukuljan, Jonathan Home, and Matthias Christandl, ``Quantum circuits for isometries'' Phys. Rev. A 93, 32318 (2016). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.93.032318 [59] Péter Rakytaand Zoltán Zimborás ``Approaching the theoretical limit in quantum gate decomposition'' Quantum 6, 710 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2022-05-11-710 [60] Lennart Bitteland Martin Kliesch ``Training variational quantum algorithms is np-hard'' Physical Review Letters 127, 120502 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.127.120502 [61] Lorenzo Piroli, Georgios Styliaris, and J. Ignacio Cirac, ``Quantum Circuits assisted by LOCC: Transformations and Phases of Matter'' Physical Review Letters 127, 220503 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.127.220503 [62] A. Barenco, C.H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D.P. DiVincenzo, N. Margolus, P.W. Shor, T. Sleator, J.A. Smolin, and H. Weinfurter, ``Elementary gates for quantum computation'' Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457–3467 (1995). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.52.3457Cited byCould not fetch Crossref cited-by data during last attempt 2026-04-21 12:05:34: Could not fetch cited-by data for 10.22331/q-2026-04-21-2079 from Crossref. This is normal if the DOI was registered recently. Could not fetch ADS cited-by data during last attempt 2026-04-21 12:05:34: No response from ADS or unable to decode the received json data when getting the list of citing works.This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions. AbstractWe introduce parallel-sequential (PS) circuits, a family of quantum circuit layouts that interpolate between brickwall and sequential circuits, which introduces control parameters governing a trade-off between the amount of entanglement and the maximum correlation range they can express. We provide numerical evidence that PS circuits can efficiently prepare many-body ground states in one dimension. On noisy devices, characterized through both idling errors and two-qubit gate errors, we show that in a wide parameter regime, PS circuits outperform brickwall, sequential, and the log-depth circuits from [Malz, Styliaris, Wei, Cirac, PRL 132, 040404 (2024)]. Additionally, we demonstrate that properly chosen noisy random PS circuits suppress error proliferation and, when employed as a variational ansatz, exhibit superior trainability.Popular summaryWe introduce parallel-sequential (PS) circuits, a class of quantum circuit layouts that unify and generalize brickwall and sequential circuits across arbitrary dimensions. Focusing on one-dimensional systems, we demonstrate that PS circuits efficiently prepare various classes of many-body ground states. Due to their optimized structure, we find that PS circuits outperform brickwall and sequential circuits on noisy quantum devices. Furthermore, appropriately selected noisy random PS circuits exhibit suppressed error proliferation, and superior trainability when used variationally. Our work thus offers a versatile and practically accessible strategy to improve performance across a wide array of quantum tasks on noisy quantum devices.► BibTeX data@article{Wei2026statepreparation, doi = {10.22331/q-2026-04-21-2079}, url = {https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2026-04-21-2079}, title = {State preparation with parallel-sequential circuits}, author = {Wei, Zhi-Yuan and Malz, Daniel}, journal = {{Quantum}}, issn = {2521-327X}, publisher = {{Verein zur F{\"{o}}rderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften}}, volume = {10}, pages = {2079}, month = apr, year = {2026} }► References [1] M A Nielsenand I L Chuang ``Quantum computation and quantum information'' Cambridge University Press (2000). [2] Guifré Vidal ``Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems'' Physical Review Letters 93, 1–4 (2004). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.93.040502 [3] C. Schön, E. Solano, F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, and M. M. Wolf, ``Sequential generation of entangled multiqubit states'' Physical Review Letters 95, 1–4 (2005). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.95.110503 [4] M. C. Bañuls, D. Pérez-García, M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, ``Sequentially generated states for the study of two-dimensional systems'' Physical Review A 77, 1–9 (2008). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.77.052306 [5] Michael P.

Zaleteland Frank Pollmann ``Isometric Tensor Network States in Two Dimensions'' Physical Review Letters 124, 37201 (2020). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.124.037201 [6] Zhi Yuan Wei, Daniel Malz, and J Ignacio Cirac, ``Sequential Generation of Projected Entangled-Pair States'' Physical Review Letters 128, 1–14 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.128.010607 [7] Yu-Jie Liu, Kirill Shtengel, Adam Smith, and Frank Pollmann, ``Methods for Simulating String-Net States and Anyons on a Digital Quantum Computer'' PRX Quantum 3, 040315 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.3.040315 [8] Xie Chen, Arpit Dua, Michael Hermele, David T Stephen, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Robijn Vanhove, and Jing-Yu Zhao, ``Sequential quantum circuits as maps between gapped phases'' Physical Review B 109, 075116 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.109.075116 [9] Y. Y. Shi, L. M. Duan, and G Vidal, ``Classical simulation of quantum many-body systems with a tree tensor network'' Physical Review A 74, 1–4 (2006). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.74.022320 [10] Adam Smith, Bernhard Jobst, Andrew G Green, and Frank Pollmann, ``Crossing a topological phase transition with a quantum computer'' Physical Review Research 4, L022020 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.4.L022020 [11] Shi Ju Ran ``Encoding of matrix product states into quantum circuits of one- A nd two-qubit gates'' Physical Review A 101, 1–7 (2020). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.101.032310 [12] Sheng-Hsuan Lin, Rohit Dilip, Andrew G Green, Adam Smith, and Frank Pollmann, ``Real-and imaginary-time evolution with compressed quantum circuits'' PRX Quantum 2, 10342 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.2.010342 [13] Reza Haghshenas, Johnnie Gray, Andrew C Potter, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, ``Variational power of quantum circuit tensor networks'' Physical Review X 12, 11047 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.12.011047 [14] Manuel S Rudolph, Jing Chen, Jacob Miller, Atithi Acharya, and Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz, ``Decomposition of matrix product states into shallow quantum circuits'' Quantum Science and Technology 9, 015012 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​ad04e6 [15] Marco Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, Ryan Babbush, Simon C Benjamin, Suguru Endo, Keisuke Fujii, Jarrod R McClean, Kosuke Mitarai, Xiao Yuan, Lukasz Cincio, and Others, ``Variational quantum algorithms'' Nature Reviews Physics 3, 625–644 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s42254-021-00348-9 [16] Kishor Bharti, Alba Cervera-Lierta, Thi Ha Kyaw, Tobias Haug, Sumner Alperin-Lea, Abhinav Anand, Matthias Degroote, Hermanni Heimonen, Jakob S Kottmann, Tim Menke, and Others, ``Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms'' Reviews of Modern Physics 94, 15004 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.94.015004 [17] Jules Tilly, Hongxiang Chen, Shuxiang Cao, Dario Picozzi, Kanav Setia, Ying Li, Edward Grant, Leonard Wossnig, Ivan Rungger, and George H Booth, ``The variational quantum eigensolver: a review of methods and best practices'' Physics Reports 986, 1–128 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.physrep.2022.08.003 [18] Matthew B Hastings ``An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems'' Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, P08024 (2007). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1742-5468/​2007/​08/​P08024 [19] Jens Eisert, Marcus Cramer, and Martin B Plenio, ``Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy'' Reviews of modern physics 82, 277 (2010). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.82.277 [20] M. B. Hastings ``Locality in Quantum and Markov Dynamics on Lattices and Networks'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 140402 (2004). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.93.140402 [21] Daniel Malz, Georgios Styliaris, Zhi-Yuan Wei, and J Ignacio Cirac, ``Preparation of matrix product states with log-depth quantum circuits'' Physical Review Letters 132, 040404 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.132.040404 [22] Silvano Garnerone, Thiago R de Oliveira, Stephan Haas, and Paolo Zanardi, ``Statistical properties of random matrix product states'' Physical Review A 82, 052312 (2010). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.82.052312 [23] Jonas Haferkamp, Christian Bertoni, Ingo Roth, and Jens Eisert, ``Emergent statistical mechanics from properties of disordered random matrix product states'' PRX Quantum 2, 40308 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.2.040308 [24] Cécilia Lancienand David Pérez-Garcia ``Correlation length in random MPS and PEPS'' Annales Henri Poincaré 23, 141–222 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00023-021-01087-4 [25] D Perez-Garcia, F Verstraete, M M Wolf, and J I Cirac, ``Matrix Product State Representations'' Quantum Info. Comput. 7, 401–430 (2007). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.26421/​QIC7.5-6-1 [26] Michael M. Wolf, Gerardo Ortiz, Frank Verstraete, and J. Ignacio Cirac, ``Quantum phase transitions in matrix product systems'' Physical Review Letters 97, 1–4 (2006). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.97.110403 [27] Carlos Bravo-Prieto, Josep Lumbreras-Zarapico, Luca Tagliacozzo, and José I. Latorre, ``Scaling of variational quantum circuit depth for condensed matter systems'' Quantum 4 (2020). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2020-05-28-272 [28] Mohsin Iqbal, David Muñoz Ramo, and Henrik Dreyer, ``Preentangling Quantum Algorithms–the Density Matrix Renormalization Group-assisted Quantum Canonical Transformation'' arXiv:2209.07106 (2022). https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​2209.07106 [29] Prithvi Gundlapalliand Junyi Lee ``Deterministic and entanglement-efficient preparation of amplitude-encoded quantum registers'' Physical Review Applied 18, 024013 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevApplied.18.024013 [30] Ar A Melnikov, Alena A Termanova, Sergey V Dolgov, Florian Neukart, and MR Perelshtein, ``Quantum state preparation using tensor networks'' Quantum Science and Technology 8, 035027 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​acd9e7 [31] Jason Iaconis, Sonika Johri, and Elton Yechao Zhu, ``Quantum state preparation of normal distributions using matrix product states'' npj Quantum Information 10, 15 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41534-024-00805-0 [32] Vladyslav Bohun, Illia Lukin, Mykola Luhanko, Georgios Korpas, Philippe JS De Brouwer, Mykola Maksymenko, and Maciej Koch-Janusz, ``Scalable and shallow quantum circuits encoding probability distributions informed by asymptotic entanglement analysis'' arXiv:2412.05202 (2024). https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​2412.05202 [33] Javier Gonzalez-Conde, Thomas W Watts, Pablo Rodriguez-Grasa, and Mikel Sanz, ``Efficient quantum amplitude encoding of polynomial functions'' Quantum 8, 1297 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2024-03-21-1297 [34] Yuichi Sanoand Ikko Hamamura ``Quantum State Preparation for Probability Distributions with Mirror Symmetry Using Matrix Product States'' arXiv:2403.16729 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​yqj3-hyxv https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​2403.16729 [35] Peng-Fei Zhou, Rui Hong, and Shi-Ju Ran, ``Automatically differentiable quantum circuit for many-qubit state preparation'' Phys. Rev. A 104, 042601 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.104.042601 [36] Glen Evenblyand Guifré Vidal ``Algorithms for entanglement renormalization'' Physical Review B 79, 144108 (2009). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.79.144108 [37] Akel Hashim, Ravi K. Naik, Alexis Morvan, Jean-Loup Ville, Bradley Mitchell, John Mark Kreikebaum, Marc Davis, Ethan Smith, Costin Iancu, Kevin P. O'Brien, Ian Hincks, Joel J. Wallman, Joseph Emerson, and Irfan Siddiqi, ``Randomized Compiling for Scalable Quantum Computing on a Noisy Superconducting Quantum Processor'' Phys. Rev. X 11, 041039 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.11.041039 [38] Simon J Evered, Dolev Bluvstein, Marcin Kalinowski, Sepehr Ebadi, Tom Manovitz, Hengyun Zhou, Sophie H Li, Alexandra A Geim, Tout T Wang, and Nishad Maskara, ``High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer'' Nature 622, 268–272 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-023-06481-y [39] Steven A Moses, Charles H Baldwin, Michael S Allman, R Ancona, L Ascarrunz, C Barnes, J Bartolotta, B Bjork, P Blanchard, and M Bohn, ``A race-track trapped-ion quantum processor'' Physical Review X 13, 041052 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.13.041052 [40] Rajeev Acharya, Laleh Aghababaie-Beni, Igor Aleiner, Trond I Andersen, Markus Ansmann, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Abraham Asfaw, Nikita Astrakhantsev, and Juan Atalaya, ``Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold'' arXiv:2408.13687 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-024-08449-y https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​2408.13687 [41] Marco Cerezo, Akira Sone, Tyler Volkoff, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J Coles, ``Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits'' Nature communications 12, 1–12 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-021-21728-w [42] Hao-Kai Zhang, Shuo Liu, and Shi-Xin Zhang, ``Absence of barren plateaus in finite local-depth circuits with long-range entanglement'' Physical Review Letters 132, 150603 (2024). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.132.150603 [43] Samson Wang, Enrico Fontana, Marco Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Akira Sone, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J Coles, ``Noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms'' Nature communications 12, 1–11 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-021-27045-6 [44] Guillermo González-García, Rahul Trivedi, and J. Ignacio Cirac, ``Error Propagation in NISQ Devices for Solving Classical Optimization Problems'' PRX Quantum 3, 040326 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.3.040326 [45] Sergio Boixo, Sergei V. Isakov, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, Nan Ding, Zhang Jiang, Michael J. Bremner, John M. Martinis, and Hartmut Neven, ``Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices'' Nature Physics 14, 595–600 (2018). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41567-018-0124-x [46] Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Ryan Babbush, Dave Bacon, Joseph C Bardin, Rami Barends, Rupak Biswas, Sergio Boixo, Fernando GSL Brandao, and David A Buell, ``Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor'' nature 574, 505–510 (2019). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-019-1666-5 [47] Fernando G S L Brandão, Wissam Chemissany, Nicholas Hunter-Jones, Richard Kueng, and John Preskill, ``Models of quantum complexity growth'' PRX Quantum 2, 30316 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.2.030316 [48] Dominik Hangleiterand Jens Eisert ``Computational advantage of quantum random sampling'' Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 035001 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.95.035001 [49] Hans J Briegel, David E Browne, Wolfgang Dür, Robert Raussendorf, and Maarten Van den Nest, ``Measurement-based quantum computation'' Nature Physics 5, 19–26 (2009). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nphys1157 [50] Matthew B Hastingsand Tohru Koma ``Spectral gap and exponential decay of correlations'' Communications in mathematical physics 265, 781–804 (2006). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00220-006-0030-4 [51] Jaš Bensaand Marko Žnidarič ``Fastest local entanglement scrambler, multistage thermalization, and a non-Hermitian phantom'' Physical Review X 11, 031019 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.11.031019 [52] Harper R. Grimsley, Sophia E. Economou, Edwin Barnes, and Nicholas J. Mayhall, ``An adaptive variational algorithm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer'' Nature Communications 10 (2019). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-019-10988-2 [53] Matthew Fishman, Steven White, and Edwin Stoudenmire, ``The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations'' SciPost Physics Codebases 004 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.21468/​SciPostPhysCodeb.4 [54] Giacomo Torlaiand Matthew Fishman ``PastaQ: A Package for Simulation, Tomography and Analysis of Quantum Computers'' (2020). https:/​/​github.com/​GTorlai/​PastaQ.jl/​ [55] Ulrich Schollwöck ``The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states'' Annals of Physics 326, 96–192 (2011). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2010.09.012 [56] C. Schön, K. Hammerer, M. M. Wolf, J. I. Cirac, and E. Solano, ``Sequential generation of matrix-product states in cavity QED'' Physical Review A 75, 1–10 (2007). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.75.032311 [57] Zhi-Yuan Wei, Daniel Malz, and J Ignacio Cirac, ``Efficient adiabatic preparation of tensor network states'' Physical Review Research 5, L022037 (2023). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.5.L022037 [58] Raban Iten, Roger Colbeck, Ivan Kukuljan, Jonathan Home, and Matthias Christandl, ``Quantum circuits for isometries'' Phys. Rev. A 93, 32318 (2016). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.93.032318 [59] Péter Rakytaand Zoltán Zimborás ``Approaching the theoretical limit in quantum gate decomposition'' Quantum 6, 710 (2022). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2022-05-11-710 [60] Lennart Bitteland Martin Kliesch ``Training variational quantum algorithms is np-hard'' Physical Review Letters 127, 120502 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.127.120502 [61] Lorenzo Piroli, Georgios Styliaris, and J. Ignacio Cirac, ``Quantum Circuits assisted by LOCC: Transformations and Phases of Matter'' Physical Review Letters 127, 220503 (2021). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.127.220503 [62] A. Barenco, C.H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D.P. DiVincenzo, N. Margolus, P.W. Shor, T. Sleator, J.A. Smolin, and H. Weinfurter, ``Elementary gates for quantum computation'' Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457–3467 (1995). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.52.3457Cited byCould not fetch Crossref cited-by data during last attempt 2026-04-21 12:05:34: Could not fetch cited-by data for 10.22331/q-2026-04-21-2079 from Crossref. This is normal if the DOI was registered recently. Could not fetch ADS cited-by data during last attempt 2026-04-21 12:05:34: No response from ADS or unable to decode the received json data when getting the list of citing works.This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.

Read Original

Tags

quantum-hardware
partnership

Source Information

Source: Quantum Journal