Science history: Stephen Hawking writes a tiny paper — and turns our understanding of black holes inside out — March 1, 1974
Summarize this article with:
In 1974, physicist Stephen Hawking described the potential for tiny, primordial black holes that existed at the dawn of time to explode — and reshaped what we knew about these cosmic behemoths. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.Become a Member in Seconds Unlock instant access to exclusive member features.You are now subscribedYour newsletter sign-up was successfulWant to add more newsletters?Delivered DailyDaily NewsletterSign up for the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world direct to your inbox.Once a weekLife's Little MysteriesFeed your curiosity with an exclusive mystery every week, solved with science and delivered direct to your inbox before it's seen anywhere else.Once a weekHow It WorksSign up to our free science & technology newsletter for your weekly fix of fascinating articles, quick quizzes, amazing images, and moreDelivered dailySpace.com NewsletterBreaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!Once a monthWatch This SpaceSign up to our monthly entertainment newsletter to keep up with all our coverage of the latest sci-fi and space movies, tv shows, games and books.Once a weekNight Sky This WeekDiscover this week's must-see night sky events, moon phases, and stunning astrophotos. Sign up for our skywatching newsletter and explore the universe with us!Join the clubGet full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.Milestone: Black hole radiation theorizedDate: March 1, 1974Where: Cambridge, EnglandWho: Stephen HawkingIn 1974, a brilliant 32-year-old physicist published a not-quite-two-page paper in the journal Nature — and blew up one of our fundamental assumptions about black holes.The author was Stephen Hawking, and the paper, "Black hole explosions?," would become his most lasting legacy.According to Einstein's theory of relativity, black holes are so massive that nothing, not even light, can escape their clutches. By that logic, black holes should grow only as the universe ages, devouring nearby matter or merging with other black holes to eventually reach supermassive scales.But for a few years prior to his seminal paper, Hawking had been investigating how quantum mechanics — the strange laws that govern subatomic particles — would impact black hole growth and evolution. Building on the work of theoretical physicist Jacob Bekenstein, he combined general relativity, the laws of thermodynamics and relatively simple quantum physics to deduce that black holes radiate minuscule amounts of heat. In his popular 1988 book "A Brief History of Time," Hawking claimed that was because pairs of "virtual" particles pop in and out of existence throughout the universe, annihilating on contact.Occasionally, however, one member of the pair would emerge just outside a black hole's event horizon, while the other would be just inside that boundary. One would fall in, while the other would escape, carrying a tiny bit of heat with it. Over time, this loss of heat, or radiation, would shrink the black hole, leading its surface gravity to increase. That, in turn, would make the black hole accelerate the radiation, leading to the black hole's eventual evaporation, possibly via explosion.(In fact, later research showed that particle-antiparticle explanation is grossly simplified, and Hawking radiation actually appears as a result of the acceleration of an observer close to a black hole's event horizon.)For black holes with the mass of the sun or bigger, evaporation by what's now known as "Hawking radiation" would take longer than the age of the universe, the study concluded. But Hawking also wondered whether tiny primordial black holes were formed from "quantum fluctuations" at the dawn of time. These tiny black holes, smaller than about 1 trillion kilograms, would have long since blown up, he concluded.Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox."This is a fairly small explosion by astronomical standards but it is equivalent to about 1 million 1 Mton hydrogen bombs," Hawking dryly noted in his paper. Hawking radiation soon became firmly entrenched in physics theory. But it also revealed a huge paradox in black hole physics: Evaporation meant that "information" that fell into a black hole was lost forever. That, in turn, would violate a central tenet of quantum mechanics: that information cannot be created or destroyed. For the next four decades, until his death in 2018, Hawking would chip away at the black hole information paradox.In a 2015 public lecture in Sweden, Hawking reiterated his proposal that information can indeed escape a black hole, possibly via a wormhole."Black holes ain't as black as they are painted. They are not the eternal prisons they were once thought," Hawking said. "Things can get out of a black hole both on the outside and possibly come out in another universe."After his death, some of his collaborators published a series of papers that seemed to resolve the paradox; information is not lost once it enters a black hole, they posited, but regurgitated.And in 2024, physicists proposed a way to find it: The information gobbled up by a black hole would leave traces in subtle ripples in the space-time surrounding these cosmic monsters. These ripples would reveal themselves in gravitational waves we're already detecting using massive observatories.Scientists have yet to find direct evidence for black hole explosions or primordial black holes. But the James Webb Space Telescope recently detected an ancient galaxy that could be explained by primordial black holes.Tia is the editor-in-chief (premium) and was formerly managing editor and senior writer for Live Science. Her work has appeared in Scientific American, Wired.com, Science News and other outlets. She holds a master's degree in bioengineering from the University of Washington, a graduate certificate in science writing from UC Santa Cruz and a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. Tia was part of a team at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that published the Empty Cradles series on preterm births, which won multiple awards, including the 2012 Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism.You must confirm your public display name before commentingPlease logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.