Scalable generation of massive Schrödinger cat states via quantum tunnelling

Summarize this article with:
Nature Physics (2026)Cite this article Massive objects in spatial superposition may provide insights into the interplay between quantum mechanics and gravity. Cold-atom interferometers offer a promising platform due to extended matter-wave coherence times and precise controllability. However, high-mass spatial superpositions beyond single atoms have yet to be generated in such setups. Here we report the scalable realization of high-mass spatial entanglement via the quantum tunnelling of ultracold atoms in optical lattices. We observe the coherent tunnelling of bound clusters, forming a composite object with a mass of 608 AMU. Full control of the model parameters allows us to mitigate the usual suppression of tunnelling with increasing mass. Furthermore, we construct an interferometer to certify the entanglement and use spatially distributed Schrödinger cat states to perform quantum-enhanced measurements. These results establish an approach to generate and detect massive superposition states relevant to studies of quantum gravity.This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel any timeSubscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $259.00 per yearonly $21.58 per issueBuy this articleUSD 39.95Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkoutSource data are provided with this paper.Feynman, R. P. The Role of Gravitation in Physics: Report from the 1957 Chapel Hill Conference Vol. 5 (Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften, 2011).Bose, S. et al. Massive quantum systems as interfaces of quantum mechanics and gravity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 015003 (2025).Article ADS Google Scholar Marletto, C. & Vedral, V. Quantum-information methods for quantum gravity laboratory-based tests. Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 015006 (2025).Article ADS Google Scholar Fein, Y. Y. et al. Quantum superposition of molecules beyond 25 kDa. Nat. Phys. 15, 1242–1245 (2019).Article Google Scholar Bild, M. et al. Schrödinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator. Science 380, 274–278 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Kovachy, T. et al. Quantum superposition at the half-metre scale. Nature 528, 530–533 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar Panda, C. D. et al. Coherence limits in lattice atom interferometry at the one-minute scale. Nat. Phys. 20, 1234–1239 (2024).Article Google Scholar Szigeti, S. S., Hosten, O. & Haine, S. A. Improving cold-atom sensors with quantum entanglement: prospects and challenges. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 140501 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Cirac, J. I., Lewenstein, M., Mølmer, K. & Zoller, P. Quantum superposition states of Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. A 57, 1208–1218 (1998).Article ADS Google Scholar Andrews, M. R. et al. Observation of interference between two Bose condensates. Science 275, 637–641 (1997).Article Google Scholar Jiang, T. et al. One- and two-dimensional cluster states for topological phase simulation and measurement-based quantum computation. Nat. Phys. 22, 430–438 (2026).Smerzi, A., Fantoni, S., Giovanazzi, S. & Shenoy, S. R. Quantum coherent atomic tunneling between two trapped Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4950–4953 (1997).Article ADS Google Scholar Albiez, M. et al. Direct observation of tunneling and nonlinear self-trapping in a single bosonic Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010402 (2005).Article ADS Google Scholar Pezzé, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M. K., Schmied, R. & Treutlein, P. Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018).Article ADS Google Scholar Fölling, S. et al. Direct observation of second-order atom tunnelling. Nature 448, 1029–1032 (2007).Article ADS Google Scholar Preiss, P. M. et al. Strongly correlated quantum walks in optical lattices. Science 347, 1229–1233 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar Murmann, S. et al. Two fermions in a double well: exploring a fundamental building block of the Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 080402 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar Yang, B. et al. Observation of gauge invariance in a 71-site Bose–Hubbard quantum simulator. Nature 587, 392–396 (2020).Article ADS Google Scholar Razavy, M. Quantum Theory of Tunneling (World Scientific, 2013).Burt, E. A. et al. Coherence, correlations, and collisions: what one learns about Bose-Einstein condensates from their decay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 337–340 (1997).Article ADS Google Scholar Winkler, K. et al. Repulsively bound atom pairs in an optical lattice. Nature 441, 853–856 (2006).Article ADS Google Scholar Bloch, I., Dalibard, J. & Zwerger, W. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885–964 (2008).Article ADS Google Scholar Lewenstein, M. et al. Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices: Simulating Quantum Many-Body Systems (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).Jaksch, D., Bruder, C., Cirac, J. I., Gardiner, C. W. & Zoller, P. Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108 (1998).Article ADS Google Scholar Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hansch, T. W. & Bloch, I. Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms. Nature 415, 39–44 (2002).Article ADS Google Scholar Sebby-Strabley, J., Anderlini, M., Jessen, P. S. & Porto, J. V. Lattice of double wells for manipulating pairs of cold atoms. Phys. Rev. A 73, 033605 (2006).Article ADS Google Scholar Yang, B. et al. Cooling and entangling ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Science 369, 550–553 (2020).Article ADS Google Scholar Tolra, B. L. et al. Observation of reduced three-body recombination in a correlated 1D degenerate Bose gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 190401 (2004).Article ADS Google Scholar Bojović, P. et al. High-fidelity collisional quantum gates with fermionic atoms. Nature 652, 602–608 (2026).Article Google Scholar Dutta, O. et al. Non-standard Hubbard models in optical lattices: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 066001 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar Cheinet, P. et al. Counting atoms using interaction blockade in an optical superlattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 090404 (2008).Article ADS Google Scholar Kwan, J. et al. Realization of one-dimensional anyons with arbitrary statistical phase. Science 386, 1055–1060 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Lee, H., Kok, P. & Dowling, J. P. A quantum Rosetta stone for interferometry. J. Mod. Opt. 49, 2325–2338 (2002).Article ADS Google Scholar Braunstein, S. L. & Caves, C. M. Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439–3443 (1994).Article ADS Google Scholar Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O. & Rempe, G. Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom. Nature 608, 677–681 (2022).Article ADS Google Scholar Yang, B. et al. Spin-dependent optical superlattice. Phys. Rev. A 96, 011602 (2017).Article ADS Google Scholar Meinert, F. et al. Observation of many-body dynamics in long-range tunneling after a quantum quench. Science 344, 1259–1262 (2014).Article ADS Google Scholar Kaufman, A. M. et al. Two-particle quantum interference in tunnel-coupled optical tweezers. Science 345, 306–309 (2014).Article ADS Google Scholar Bassi, A., Lochan, K., Satin, S., Singh, T. P. & Ulbricht, H. Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 471–527 (2013).Article ADS Google Scholar Daley, A. J. et al. Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation. Nature 607, 667–676 (2022).Article ADS Google Scholar Halimeh, J. C., Aidelsburger, M., Grusdt, F., Hauke, P. & Yang, B. Cold-atom quantum simulators of gauge theories. Nat. Phys. 21, 25–36 (2025).Article Google Scholar Download referencesWe thank J. Halimeh, P. Hauke, S. Jochim, X. J. Liu, J.-W. Pan, B. Wu, H.-Z. Zhao, Q. Zhou, P. Zoller and our colleagues at SUSTech for insightful discussions. This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2022YFA1405800), NSFC (grant number 12274199), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (grant number KQTD20240729102026004), Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (grant number 2023B0303000011) and Guangdong Provincial Quantum Science Strategic Initiative (grant numbers GDZX2204003, GDZX2303002, GDZX2304006 and GDZX2405006).These authors contributed equally: Han Zhang, Yong-Kui Wang, Yi Zheng.State Key Laboratory of Quantum Functional Materials, Department of Physics and Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Quantum Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, ChinaHan Zhang, Yong-Kui Wang, Yi Zheng, Hai-Tao Bai & Bing YangQuantum Science Center of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, Shenzhen, ChinaHan Zhang & Bing YangSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarB.Y. conceived, designed and supervised the experiment. B.Y., Y.-K.W., H.Z., Y.Z. and H.-T.B. built the apparatus. H.Z., Y.Z., B.Y. and Y.-K.W. performed the experiments and analysed the data. B.Y. and H.Z. wrote the paper, with input from all authors.Correspondence to Bing Yang.The authors declare no competing interests.Nature Physics thanks Simon Haine and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Supplementary Figs. 1–10, Table 1 and Discussion.Statistical source data for Fig. 1.Statistical source data for Fig. 2.Statistical source data for Fig. 3.Statistical source data for Fig. 4.Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.Reprints and permissionsZhang, H., Wang, YK., Zheng, Y. et al. Scalable generation of massive Schrödinger cat states via quantum tunnelling. Nat. Phys. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026-03281-9Download citationReceived: 26 July 2025Accepted: 02 April 2026Published: 11 May 2026Version of record: 11 May 2026DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026-03281-9Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
