Back to News
quantum-computing

Robustness-Runtime Tradeoff for Quantum State Transfer

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers introduced a new metric called robustness to quantify how well quantum state transfer protocols tolerate errors in ancilla qubit initialization, addressing a key limitation in current speed-optimized methods that assume perfect ancilla states. The study proves robustness is directly linked to Schatten p-norms of commutators between initial and final-site operators, generalizing prior work on state-dependent (p=∞) and state-independent (p=2) transfer protocols. By combining this framework with power-law light cones, the team derived tighter runtime bounds for partially state-dependent protocols, achieving parametric improvements over existing limits in certain regimes. New robust protocols were proposed, mapping the tradeoff spectrum between fully state-dependent and fully state-independent transfer, offering practical pathways for noise-resilient quantum networks. The findings bridge theory and experiment, providing tools to optimize state transfer in noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices where ancilla imperfections are inevitable.
Robustness-Runtime Tradeoff for Quantum State Transfer

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2602.22312 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 25 Feb 2026] Title:Robustness-Runtime Tradeoff for Quantum State Transfer Authors:Twesh Upadhyaya, Yifan Hong, T. C. Mooney, Alexey V. Gorshkov View a PDF of the paper titled Robustness-Runtime Tradeoff for Quantum State Transfer, by Twesh Upadhyaya and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Quantum state transfer is the primitive of transporting an unknown state on one site of a lattice to another. Using power-law interactions, recent state transfer protocols achieve speedup by utilizing the intermediate ancilla sites. However, these protocols require the ancillas to be in a perfectly initialized state, which, due to noise or imperfect control, may not be the case. In this work we introduce the $\textit{robustness}$ of a state transfer protocol, which quantifies the protocol's tolerance to error in the initial ancilla state. In the Heisenberg picture, state transfer grows operators supported on the final site such that they no longer commute with all operators on the starting site. We prove that this robustness tightly bounds the Schatten $p$-norms of these commutators between initial and final-site operators. This generalizes the known cases of $p=\infty$ and $p=2$, which govern completely state-dependent and state-independent state transfer respectively, demonstrating that intermediate values of $p$ govern partially state-dependent state transfer. In conjunction with existing power-law light cones, our result gives new minimum runtimes for partially state-dependent protocols which, in certain regimes, are parametrically better than existing bounds. We introduce new robust state transfer protocols, charting the landscape between complete state-dependence and state-independence. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Atomic Physics (physics.atom-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2602.22312 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2602.22312v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.22312 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Twesh Upadhyaya [view email] [v1] Wed, 25 Feb 2026 19:00:01 UTC (496 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Robustness-Runtime Tradeoff for Quantum State Transfer, by Twesh Upadhyaya and 3 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-02 Change to browse by: physics physics.atom-ph References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

government-funding

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics