Back to News
quantum-computing

Retrieving the Baby: Reichenbach's Principle, Bell Locality, and Selection Bias

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Philosopher Huw Price argues John Bell’s 1990 "Factorizability" rule—central to proving quantum nonlocality—may discard a critical insight: selection bias could explain apparent violations without rejecting intuitive locality. The paper reclaims Bell’s warning about losing "the baby" (intuitive locality) when formalizing principles, showing EPR-Bell correlations might stem from selection effects akin to statistical collider bias, not supernatural action-at-a-distance. Reichenbach’s Principle of Common Cause (PCC) typically explains correlations via shared past causes, but Price notes EPR-Bell cases, like selection-biased data, naturally fall outside PCC’s scope—a previously overlooked parallel. This reframing challenges the dominance of nonlocality interpretations in quantum foundations, suggesting quantum weirdness may reflect observational constraints rather than fundamental physics, with implications for causal modeling beyond quantum theory. The work bridges quantum physics, statistics, and philosophy, proposing selection bias as a ubiquitous but underrecognized factor in quantum phenomena and classical causal inference alike.
Retrieving the Baby: Reichenbach's Principle, Bell Locality, and Selection Bias

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2602.16985 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 19 Feb 2026] Title:Retrieving the Baby: Reichenbach's Principle, Bell Locality, and Selection Bias Authors:Huw Price View a PDF of the paper titled Retrieving the Baby: Reichenbach's Principle, Bell Locality, and Selection Bias, by Huw Price View PDF Abstract:In his late piece 'La nouvelle cuisine' (Bell 1990), John Bell describes the steps from an intuitive, informal principle of locality to a mathematical rule called Factorizability. This rule stipulates that when possible past causes are held fixed, the joint probabilities of outcomes of spacelike separated measurements, conditional on measurement settings, be the product of the local conditional probabilities individually. Bell shows that Factorizability conflicts with predictions of QM, predictions since confirmed in many experiments. However, Bell warns his readers that the steps leading to Factorizability should 'be viewed with the utmost suspicion'. He says that 'it is precisely in cleaning up intuitive ideas for mathematics that one is likely to throw the baby out with the bathwater' (1990, 239). Bell's suspicions were well-founded, for he himself misses an important baby. Here we retrieve and identify it: it is selection bias. We explain how failure of Factorizability may be regarded as a selection artefact, requiring no violation of locality in the intuitive, conceptual sense with which Bell begins his analysis. The argument begins with a central principle of causal discovery, Reichenbach's Principle of Common Cause (PCC). It is well known that correlations due to selection bias are not subject to PCC. Several writers have proposed that EPR-Bell correlations are also an exception to PCC, but it has not been noticed that they fall under this well-known exclusion. The point is relevant not only to the status of Bell nonlocality, but also for statistics and causal modeling. For these fields, the news is that selection effects play a ubiquitous role in quantum phenomena, in a form akin to collider bias. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2602.16985 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2602.16985v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.16985 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Huw Price [view email] [v1] Thu, 19 Feb 2026 01:06:54 UTC (558 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Retrieving the Baby: Reichenbach's Principle, Bell Locality, and Selection Bias, by Huw PriceView PDF view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-02 Change to browse by: physics physics.hist-ph References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-investment
startup

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics