Back to News
quantum-computing
Reconcile These Two Quantum Facts And Tell Me Why NIST Still Have 2035 for PQC Dates
Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)
Loading...
1 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
U.S. federal agencies face a 2035 deadline for full post-quantum cryptography (PQC) adoption per NIST/CISA guidelines, despite accelerating global timelines.
Other nations, including EU members and allies, have advanced their PQC transition deadlines to 2030 or earlier, citing urgent quantum threats.
Recent research suggests 100,000 physical qubits could break RSA-2048 encryption, a threshold multiple quantum firms aim to reach within years.
Experts warn most U.S. organizations require five-plus years to fully migrate to PQC, raising concerns about the 2035 timeline’s adequacy against near-term quantum risks.
The discrepancy between U.S. timelines and global urgency highlights potential gaps in risk assessment, infrastructure readiness, or strategic prioritization.

Summarize this article with:
NIST/CISA still currently recommends 2035 as the year when US agencies and organizations should be fully PQC. Multiple other countries have moved up their dates to 2030 or before. If multiple quantum computer companies plan to have over 100K physical qubits and the latest research says RSA 2048-bit key can be cracked with 100K physical qubits, how could the US PQC dates stand?? Especially, when most PQC timelines say it will take the average US org over 5 years to convert?? submitted by /u/rogeragrimes [link] [comments]
Tags
post-quantum-cryptography
quantum-computing
quantum-hardware
Source Information
Source: Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)
