Back to News
quantum-computing

The Quest for Quantum Advantage in Combinatorial Optimization: End-to-end Benchmarking of Quantum Solvers vs. Multi-core Classical Solvers

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers benchmarked IBM’s Heron r3 quantum processor against classical solvers in combinatorial optimization, achieving sub-second end-to-end runtimes for 20 higher-order binary optimization problems. A single hybrid quantum-classical attempt matched ground-state solutions in 14 of 20 cases, outperforming CPU-based solvers like simulated annealing and memetic tabu search at equivalent runtimes. Only GPU-accelerated ABS3 and enhanced parallel tempering classical methods matched or exceeded the quantum solver’s performance, requiring 128 vCPUs or 8 NVIDIA A100 GPUs. The study provides a reproducible benchmark for tracking quantum hardware progress, emphasizing strict wall-clock accounting from preprocessing to postprocessing. Results suggest current quantum processors can compete with high-performance classical systems in specific optimization tasks, marking a step toward practical quantum advantage.
The Quest for Quantum Advantage in Combinatorial Optimization: End-to-end Benchmarking of Quantum Solvers vs. Multi-core Classical Solvers

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2603.13607 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 13 Mar 2026] Title:The Quest for Quantum Advantage in Combinatorial Optimization: End-to-end Benchmarking of Quantum Solvers vs. Multi-core Classical Solvers Authors:Pranav Chandarana, Alejandro Gomez Cadavid, Enrique Solano, Thorsten Koch, Stefan Woerner, Narendra N. Hegade View a PDF of the paper titled The Quest for Quantum Advantage in Combinatorial Optimization: End-to-end Benchmarking of Quantum Solvers vs. Multi-core Classical Solvers, by Pranav Chandarana and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We perform an end-to-end benchmark of a hybrid sequential quantum computing (HSQC) solver for higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO), executed on IBM Heron r3 quantum processors to evaluate the potential of current quantum hardware for combinatorial optimization with sub-second end-to-end runtimes. All reported runtimes include the complete pipeline--from preprocessing to QPU execution and postprocessing--under strict wall-clock accounting. Across 20 benchmark instances, a single hybrid attempt produces high-quality solutions in less than one second, matching the ground-state energy in 14 cases. At the same runtime, CPU-based solvers, including simulated annealing, memetic tabu search, and EasySolve, do not reach the value obtained by HSQC, whereas an enhanced parallel tempering method and the GPU-accelerated solver ABS3 reach or surpass it. These results show that HSQC, executed on a single QPU, can achieve performance competitive with strong classical solvers running on 128 vCPUs or 8 NVIDIA A100 GPUs, while also providing a reproducible system-level benchmark for tracking progress as quantum hardware and hybrid sequential workflows improve. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics (cond-mat.mes-hall) Cite as: arXiv:2603.13607 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2603.13607v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.13607 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Narendra N. Hegade [view email] [v1] Fri, 13 Mar 2026 21:29:20 UTC (1,058 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled The Quest for Quantum Advantage in Combinatorial Optimization: End-to-end Benchmarking of Quantum Solvers vs. Multi-core Classical Solvers, by Pranav Chandarana and 5 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cond-mat cond-mat.mes-hall References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-optimization
energy-climate
quantum-computing
quantum-hardware
quantum-advantage
silicon-quantum

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics