Back to News
quantum-computing

Quantum Estimation of Delay Tail Probabilities in Scheduling and Load Balancing

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A new quantum framework tackles the computationally intractable problem of estimating rare delay violations in scheduling and load balancing systems, where classical methods fail due to unbounded state spaces and exponential sample complexity. The approach leverages Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) combined with truncated regenerative simulation, reformulating rare-event estimators as reversible functions of finite random seeds to fit quantum circuit constraints. Lyapunov drift and concentration bounds ensure negligible bias from truncation, enabling provably accurate tail probability estimates while avoiding the need to determine mixing times for infinite-state systems. The method provides concrete qubit and circuit complexity bounds for three key models: GI-GI-1 queues, MaxWeight wireless networks, and multi-server JSQ routing systems. This work bridges quantum computing with queueing theory, offering quadratic speedups for critical infrastructure optimization where classical simulations are prohibitively expensive.
Quantum Estimation of Delay Tail Probabilities in Scheduling and Load Balancing

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2602.09059 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 8 Feb 2026] Title:Quantum Estimation of Delay Tail Probabilities in Scheduling and Load Balancing Authors:R. Srikant View a PDF of the paper titled Quantum Estimation of Delay Tail Probabilities in Scheduling and Load Balancing, by R. Srikant View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Estimating delay tail probabilities in scheduling and load balancing systems is a critical but computationally prohibitive task due to the rarity of violation events.

Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) offers a generic quadratic reduction in sample complexity 1/sqrt(p) vs 1/p, but applying it to steady-state queueing networks in challenging: classical simulations involve unbounded state spaces and random regeneration cycles, whereas quantum circuits have fixed depth and finite registers. In this paper, we develop a framework for quantum simulation of delay tail probabilities based on truncated regenerative simulation. We show that regenerative rare-event estimators can be reformulated as deterministic, reversible functions of finite random seeds by truncating regeneration cycles. To control the resulting bias, we use Lyapunov drift and concentration arguments to derive exponential tail bounds on regeneration times. This allows the truncation horizon--and hence the quantum circuit depth--to be chosen such that the bias is provably negligible compared to the statistical error. The proposed framework enables quantum estimation in models with countably infinite state spaces, avoiding the challenge of determining the sufficient mixing time required for direct finite-horizon simulation. We provide bounds on qubit and circuit complexity for a GI-GI-1 queue, a wireless network under MaxWeight scheduling, and a multi-server system with Join-the-Shortest-Queue (JSQ) routing. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Probability (math.PR) Cite as: arXiv:2602.09059 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2602.09059v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.09059 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: R Srikant [view email] [v1] Sun, 8 Feb 2026 21:28:09 UTC (34 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Quantum Estimation of Delay Tail Probabilities in Scheduling and Load Balancing, by R. SrikantView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-02 Change to browse by: math math.PR References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-optimization
quantum-investment
quantum-algorithms
quantum-hardware
quantum-simulation

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics