Back to News
quantum-computing

Quantum Computing’s Industrial Challenge - Center for a New American Security

Google News – Quantum Computing
Loading...
2 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
2026 marks a critical year as the U.S., China, and Europe refresh national quantum programs, with industrial-scale supply chains emerging as the defining challenge for quantum advancement. The U.S. leads in quantum research but faces severe supply chain vulnerabilities, relying on foreign sources—including China—for precision lasers, cryogenics, and photonic materials, risking progress delays. Less than 12% of U.S. federal quantum funding targets domestic manufacturing, leaving critical gaps despite congressional bills and potential executive orders aimed at addressing dependencies. Quantum competes for priority against AI and semiconductors, slowing policy action despite its strategic importance for economic and national security advantages. Experts warn self-reliance efforts could backfire, creating costly fragmentation unless coordinated internationally to avoid undermining collective progress in quantum technologies.
Quantum Computing’s Industrial Challenge - Center for a New American Security

Summarize this article with:

This article was originally published in Just Security.

The United States, China, and Europe are preparing to refresh their national quantum programs in 2026, making this a pivotal year for quantum policy. As quantum sensors and computers move toward real-world utility and nations compete to secure their economic and security advantages, they are converging on a defining challenge: whether their industrial bases and supply chains are ready to support scale.

The United States and Europe must take care not to turn their drive for self-reliance into costly fragmentation. Despite boasting a world-leading ecosystem of universities and startups, thin and globally dispersed supply chains increasingly constrain U.S. quantum progress.

The United States relies heavily on foreign (including Chinese) or fragile single-supplier markets for critical inputs, from precision lasers and cryogenics to photonic materials and advanced microfabrication. Yet less than twelve percent of federal quantum funding supports domestic enabling technologies and manufacturing capacity. Congressional bills and rumored upcoming executive orders signal awareness of some of these gaps, but concrete outcomes remain uncertain, especially as quantum continues to compete for attention with higher-profile policy priorities such as AI and conventional semiconductor manufacturing. Read the full article on Just Security. More from CNAS Commentary Technology & National Security America’s Key to Biotechnology Leadership? AI-Ready Biodata. This article was originally published in Just Security. From strengthening armor for U.S. warfighters to patching supply chain vulnerabilities, the convergence of AI and biote...

By Sam Howell February 13, 2026 Commentary Technology & National Security The Rise of the Answer Machines This article was originally published in Financial Times. Every spring, I take red-eyes from Austin, Texas, to Oxford, England, to teach a graduate seminar on AI and philosoph...

By Brendan McCord Financial Times January 24, 2026 Video Technology & National Security Selling H200s to China Erodes Main U.S. Advantage A new report says China could buy twice as much AI computing power as it can produce domestically if Nvidia H200 chips are allowed there. Janet Egan from the Center for a New ...

By Janet Egan January 22, 2026 Commentary Technology & National Security CNAS Insights | Unpacking the H200 Export Policy AI Chips for China With two new policies, President Donald Trump has implemented his pledge to allow sales of NVIDIA’s H200 AI chips to China in exchange for a quarter of the ...

Read Original

Tags

quantum-computing
quantum-investment
quantum-optimization
quantum-policy
quantum-sensing
startup
superconducting-qubits

Source Information

Source: Google News – Quantum Computing