Back to News
quantum-computing

Proof of a finite threshold for the union-find decoder

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers Satoshi Yoshida, Ethan Lake, and Hayata Yamasaki proved the union-find (UF) decoder achieves a finite error-correction threshold for surface codes under realistic circuit-level noise, resolving a long-standing theoretical gap. The study introduces a refined error-clustering framework showing error clusters can be isolated by larger buffers, enabling rigorous analysis of the UF decoder’s fault-tolerant performance beyond prior numerical simulations. The team established a quasi-polylogarithmic runtime bound for parallel UF decoders, confirming scalability with code size while maintaining near-linear time complexity—a critical advantage for practical quantum computing. The same framework also proves a finite threshold for the simpler greedy decoder, unifying fault-tolerance analysis across low-complexity decoders and expanding theoretical foundations for error suppression. These results bolster confidence in UF-based decoders for fault-tolerant quantum computation, bridging empirical success with formal guarantees under local stochastic error models.
Proof of a finite threshold for the union-find decoder

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2602.20238 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 23 Feb 2026] Title:Proof of a finite threshold for the union-find decoder Authors:Satoshi Yoshida, Ethan Lake, Hayata Yamasaki View a PDF of the paper titled Proof of a finite threshold for the union-find decoder, by Satoshi Yoshida and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Fast decoders that achieve strong error suppression are essential for fault-tolerant quantum computation (FTQC) from both practical and theoretical perspectives. The union-find (UF) decoder for the surface code is widely regarded as a promising candidate, offering almost-linear time complexity and favorable empirical error suppression supported by numerical evidence. However, the lack of a rigorous threshold theorem has left open whether the UF decoder can achieve fault tolerance beyond the error models and parameter regimes tested in numerical simulations. Here, we provide a rigorous proof of a finite threshold for the UF decoder on the surface code under the circuit-level local stochastic error model. To this end, we develop a refined error-clustering framework that extends techniques previously used to analyze cellular-automaton and renormalization-group decoders, by showing that error clusters can be separated by substantially larger buffers, thereby enabling analytical control over the behavior of the UF decoder. Using this guarantee, we further prove a quasi-polylogarithmic upper bound on the average runtime of a parallel UF decoder in terms of the code size. We also show that this framework yields a finite threshold for the greedy decoder, a simpler decoder with lower complexity but weaker empirical error suppression. These results provide a solid theoretical foundation for the practical use of UF-based decoders in the development of fault-tolerant quantum computers, while offering a unified framework for studying fault tolerance across these practical decoders. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2602.20238 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2602.20238v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.20238 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Hayata Yamasaki [view email] [v1] Mon, 23 Feb 2026 19:00:00 UTC (248 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Proof of a finite threshold for the union-find decoder, by Satoshi Yoshida and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-02 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-computing
quantum-error-correction

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics