Back to News
quantum-computing

Practical HPCQC Integration with QDMI: A Real-Hardware Case Study with IQM Systems

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers demonstrated a standardized integration framework for quantum computers in HPC centers using IQM’s superconducting hardware, addressing the critical bottleneck of vendor-specific adapter chains that hinder production workflows. The team implemented the Quantum Device Management Interface (QDMI) as a universal layer, bridging IQM’s hardware with Slurm schedulers and Qiskit workflows—two staples in HPC-quantum hybrid environments. The solution is open-source and hardware-agnostic. This approach eliminates bespoke engineering for each quantum backend, enabling reusable software stacks across providers. The study proves standardization at the hardware-software boundary is feasible today, not just theoretically. While not solving all HPC-quantum challenges, the work shows vendor-neutral integration can accelerate pilot-to-production transitions. IQM’s case study serves as a real-world validation of QDMI’s practicality. Authors emphasize the urgency of adopting such standards to streamline quantum-HPC convergence, reducing operational complexity for users, operators, and hardware vendors alike.
Practical HPCQC Integration with QDMI: A Real-Hardware Case Study with IQM Systems

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2604.19869 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 21 Apr 2026] Title:Practical HPCQC Integration with QDMI: A Real-Hardware Case Study with IQM Systems Authors:Lukas Burgholzer, Marcel Walter, Patrick Hopf, Álvaro Caride-Tabarés Sánchez, Teemu Mattsson, Bernd Hoffmann, Noora Färkkilä, Daniel Bulmash, Robert Wille, Eric Mansfield View a PDF of the paper titled Practical HPCQC Integration with QDMI: A Real-Hardware Case Study with IQM Systems, by Lukas Burgholzer and 9 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Quantum computers are moving into HPC centers, and the main challenge is now integration rather than pure hardware access. Many current software paths still depend on vendor-specific adapter chains between user SDKs, schedulers, and backend APIs. This pattern makes operations more complex than necessary and slows the transition from pilots to production workflows. We present a practical integration path centered on the Quantum Device Management Interface (QDMI). Using IQM superconducting systems as a hardware case study, we implement an IQM-backed QDMI layer and connect it to two software layers that HPC centers working with quantum computers already care about: Slurm-based job execution and Qiskit-facing user workflows. The implementation is publicly available at this https URL. The key message is simple: integrating quantum hardware into HPC does not have to be a bespoke engineering effort for each backend. Once the software-hardware boundary is standardized, large parts of the stack become reusable across providers and deployment styles. Our results do not claim that standardization eliminates all HPCQC challenges. They show that this specific boundary can already be standardized today in a way that is practical for users, operators, and vendors. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET) Cite as: arXiv:2604.19869 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2604.19869v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.19869 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Lukas Burgholzer [view email] [v1] Tue, 21 Apr 2026 18:00:02 UTC (730 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Practical HPCQC Integration with QDMI: A Real-Hardware Case Study with IQM Systems, by Lukas Burgholzer and 9 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.ET References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-programming
quantum-standards
government-funding
quantum-computing
quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics