Back to News
quantum-computing

Phased outcome-complete simulation

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers Kliuchnikov, Paetznick, and da Silva introduced a polynomial-time algorithm that extends outcome-complete simulation to track global phases exactly in stabilizer circuits, addressing a key limitation of prior methods. The new "phased outcome-complete simulation" enables equivalence checking for non-stabilizer circuits combining Clifford gates with symbolic single-qubit Z-rotations, verifying if circuits match for all rotation angles and measurement outcomes. This advancement supports testing compilation algorithms that preserve rotation angles while transforming Clifford components, critical for Pauli-based computation and fault-tolerant quantum architectures like surface codes. The method applies to circuits with outcome-parity-conditional Pauli gates and intermediate measurements, common in fault-tolerant designs but rarely covered by existing equivalence-checking tools. Potential applications include verifying reversible circuits (e.g., adders, multipliers) and edge-disjoint path compilation, enhancing reliability in quantum error correction and algorithm optimization.
Phased outcome-complete simulation

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2603.24717 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 25 Mar 2026] Title:Phased outcome-complete simulation Authors:Vadym Kliuchnikov, Adam Paetznick, Marcus P. da Silva View a PDF of the paper titled Phased outcome-complete simulation, by Vadym Kliuchnikov and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We generalize the polynomial-time outcome-complete simulation algorithm for stabilizer circuits in arXiv:2309.08676 to track global phases exactly, yielding what we call phased outcome-complete simulation. The original algorithm enabled equivalence checking of stabilizer circuits with intermediate measurements and conditional Pauli corrections for all input states and all measurement outcomes simultaneously, but it tracked quantum states only up to a global phase. Our generalization removes this limitation and enables equivalence checking for an important family of non-stabilizer circuits: stabilizer circuits augmented with single-qubit rotations $\exp(i\alpha Z)$ by symbolic angles. Two such circuits are equivalent if they implement the same quantum channel for all values of the symbolic angles and all measurement outcomes, given a one-to-one correspondence between rotation angles in the two circuits and a mapping between measurement outcomes. This model enables testing of compilation algorithms that transform the Clifford portions of a computation while preserving rotation angles. Examples include Pauli-based computation, edge-disjoint path compilation for surface codes, and custom compilation strategies for reversible circuits such as adders, multipliers, and table lookups. Our efficient classical verification methods extend naturally to circuits with outcome-parity-conditional Pauli gates and intermediate measurements, features that are ubiquitous in fault-tolerant quantum computing but are rarely addressed by existing equivalence-checking approaches. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2603.24717 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2603.24717v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.24717 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Marcus Silva [view email] [v1] Wed, 25 Mar 2026 18:41:35 UTC (28 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Phased outcome-complete simulation, by Vadym Kliuchnikov and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-03 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-networking
government-funding
quantum-computing
quantum-hardware
quantum-error-correction

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics