Back to News
quantum-computing

OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Control Improves Low-CNOT Multiclass Quantum Classification

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
--> Quantum Physics arXiv:2606.14088 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 12 Jun 2026] Title:OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Control Improves Low-CNOT Multiclass Quantum Classification Authors:Michael A. Magid, Melissa Zeynep Ertem, Jun Suzuki View a PDF of the paper titled OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Control Improves Low-CNOT Multiclass Quantum Classification, by Michael A. Magid and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Near-term variational classifiers incur substantial error and latency from two-qubit gates, yet practitioners often assume that additional entangling depth is the default route to higher accuracy.
OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Control Improves Low-CNOT Multiclass Quantum Classification

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2606.14088 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 12 Jun 2026] Title:OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Control Improves Low-CNOT Multiclass Quantum Classification Authors:Michael A. Magid, Melissa Zeynep Ertem, Jun Suzuki View a PDF of the paper titled OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Control Improves Low-CNOT Multiclass Quantum Classification, by Michael A. Magid and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Near-term variational classifiers incur substantial error and latency from two-qubit gates, yet practitioners often assume that additional entangling depth is the default route to higher accuracy. This work studies Optimal Quantum Measurement Decoding (OQMD): optimizing how quantum outcomes are mapped to classical labels by training a readout layer before measurement, jointly with the variational circuit, without adding CNOTs. Experiments use trainable triple single-qubit rotations as one concrete, hardware-native realization of OQMD; other single-qubit parametrizations fit the same classical outer loop. On the Iris benchmark with a 30-point stratified test split, the best observed 0-CNOT configuration with OQMD reaches 83.33\% accuracy, with a 96\% at 9 CNOTs, exceeding the best 18-CNOT controls (56.67\%) and the best 18-CNOT configuration with OQMD (66.67\%) under a common protocol. A six-point CNOT-depth series from 0 to 18 (fixed optimizer, iteration budget, random-seed count, and ZXZ readout) shows that the highest raw scores need not occur at the largest template, so aggregate complexity is not summarized by CNOT count alone. Because run-level accuracies are discrete and non-Gaussian, we emphasize best-observed scores and, where a global comparison of pooled runs is required, Mann--Whitney $U$ tests rather than parametric tests on means. Across architectures, OQMD shows statistically consistent but magnitude-dependent gains: large peak lifts on minimal circuits coexist with a small pooled mean shift on complex 18-CNOT runs ($p\approx 0.03$) that is not ``universal'' in the sense of uniformly large practical effects.% Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2606.14088 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2606.14088v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.14088 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Michael A Magid PhD [view email] [v1] Fri, 12 Jun 2026 04:05:48 UTC (3,059 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Control Improves Low-CNOT Multiclass Quantum Classification, by Michael A. Magid and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-06 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics