Optimizing Logical Mappings for Quantum Low-Density Parity Check Codes
Summarize this article with:
Quantum Physics arXiv:2603.17167 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 17 Mar 2026] Title:Optimizing Logical Mappings for Quantum Low-Density Parity Check Codes Authors:Sayam Sethi, Sahil Khan, Maxwell Poster, Abhinav Anand, Jonathan Mark Baker View a PDF of the paper titled Optimizing Logical Mappings for Quantum Low-Density Parity Check Codes, by Sayam Sethi and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Early demonstrations of fault tolerant quantum systems have paved the way for logical-level compilation. For fault-tolerant applications to succeed, execution must finish with a low total program error rate (i.e., a low program failure rate). In this work, we study a promising candidate for future fault-tolerant architectures with low spatial overhead: the Gross code. Compilation for the Gross code entails compiling to Pauli Based Computation and then reducing the rotations and measurements to the Bicycle ISA. Depending on the configuration of modules and the placement of code modules on hardware, one can reduce the amount of resulting Bicycle instructions to produce a lower overall error rate. We find that NISQ-based, and existing FTQC mappers are insufficient for mapping logical qubits on Gross code architectures because 1. they do not account for the two-level nature of the logical qubit mapping problem, which separates into code modules with distinct measurements, and 2. they naively account only for length two interactions, whereas Pauli-Products are up to length $n$, where $n$ is the number of logical qubits in the circuit. For these reasons, we introduce a two-stage pipeline that first uses hypergraph partitioning to create in-module clusters, and then executes a priority-based algorithm to efficiently assign clusters onto hardware. We find that our mapping policy reduces the error contribution from inter-module measurements, the largest source of error in the Gross Code, by up to $\sim36\%$ in the best case, with an average reduction of $\sim13\%$. On average, we reduce the failure rates from inter-module measurements by $\sim22\%$ with localized factory availability, and by $\sim17\%$ on grid architectures, allowing hardware developers to be less constrained in developing scalable fault tolerant systems due to software driven reductions in program failure rates. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2603.17167 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2603.17167v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.17167 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Sayam Sethi [view email] [v1] Tue, 17 Mar 2026 21:53:58 UTC (1,972 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Optimizing Logical Mappings for Quantum Low-Density Parity Check Codes, by Sayam Sethi and 4 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-03 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)