Back to News
quantum-computing

One- and two-dimensional cluster states for topological phase simulation and measurement-based quantum computation

Nature Physics – Quantum
Loading...
19 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Chinese researchers demonstrated scalable generation of large-scale cluster states on the 105-qubit Zuchongzhi 3.1 superconducting processor, achieving 95-qubit 1D and 72-qubit 2D entangled states. The symmetry-protected topological cluster states showed enhanced robustness against noise due to an operational parity structure, improving measurement-based quantum computation performance under perturbations. The team implemented the Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm using 2D cluster states, outperforming classical approaches in query efficiency and achieving higher fidelity than circuit-based quantum models. This work validates cluster states as a universal resource for fault-tolerant quantum computing, combining topological protection with practical algorithm execution on superconducting hardware. The study, published in March 2026, advances scalable quantum computation by integrating entanglement generation, topological error resilience, and algorithmic demonstration in a single platform.
One- and two-dimensional cluster states for topological phase simulation and measurement-based quantum computation

Summarize this article with:

Nature Physics (2026)Cite this article Quantum entanglement is a fundamental resource for quantum information processing and serves as a critical benchmark for quantum hardware performance. Cluster states are a special class of entangled states that serve as universal resources for measurement-based quantum computation and possess an intrinsic symmetry-protected topological order, which confers robustness against symmetry-respecting noise. Here we report the scalable preparation and verification of genuine multipartite cluster states on the 105-qubit Zuchongzhi 3.1 superconducting processor. We achieve one-dimensional cluster states of up to 95 qubits and two-dimensional cluster states of up to 72 qubits. The symmetry-protected topological cluster states exhibit input-state-dependent robustness under symmetry-breaking perturbations due to an operational parity structure that enhances the performance of measurement-based quantum computation. Furthermore, we use our two-dimensional cluster states to implement the Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm within the measurement-based quantum computation framework, achieving higher output-state fidelity compared with traditional circuit-based models and a query efficiency advantage over classical approaches. Our work establishes a scalable platform that combines large-scale entanglement generation, symmetry-protected topological order and practical quantum algorithms to enable robust, fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computation.This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel any timeSubscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $259.00 per yearonly $21.58 per issueBuy this articleUSD 39.95Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkoutAll source data supporting the findings of this study are available via figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30774326. Source data are provided with this paper.The code used in this study is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M. & Horodecki, K. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865–942 (2009).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A. & Vedral, V. Entanglement in many-body systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517–576 (2008).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar McCutcheon, W. et al. Experimental verification of multipartite entanglement in quantum networks. Nat. Commun. 7, 13251 (2016).Article ADS Google Scholar Jozsa, R. Entanglement and quantum computation. in The Geometric Universe (eds Huggett, S. A. et al.) Ch. 27 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998).Graham, T. M. et al. Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer. Nature 602, 63–68 (2022).

Google Scholar Barz, S. et al. Demonstration of blind quantum computing. Science 335, 303–308 (2012).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188–5191 (2001).Article ADS Google Scholar Raussendorf, R., Browne, D. E. & Briegel, H. J. Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states. Phys. Rev. A 68, 22312 (2003).Article ADS Google Scholar Briegel, H. J., Browne, D. E., Dür, W., Raussendorf, R. & Van den Nest, M. Measurement-based quantum computation. Nat. Phys. 5, 19–26 (2009).Article Google Scholar Greganti, C., Roehsner, M.-C., Barz, S., Morimae, T. & Walther, P. Demonstration of measurement-only blind quantum computing. New J. Phys. 18, 13020 (2016).Article Google Scholar Raussendorf, R., Harrington, J. & Goyal, K. A fault-tolerant one-way quantum computer. Ann. Phys. 321, 2242–2270 (2006).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Raussendorf, R. & Harrington, J. Fault-tolerant quantum computation with high threshold in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190504 (2007).Larsen, M. V. et al. Fault-tolerant continuous-variable measurement-based quantum computation architecture. PRX Quantum 2, 030325 (2021).Azses, D. et al. Identification of symmetry-protected topological states on noisy quantum computers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 120502 (2020).Article ADS Google Scholar Paszko, D., Rose, D. C., Szymańska, M. H. & Pal, A. Edge modes and symmetry-protected topological states in open quantum systems. PRX Quantum 5, 30304 (2024).Article Google Scholar Else, D. V., Schwarz, I., Bartlett, S. D. & Doherty, A. C. Symmetry-protected phases for measurement-based quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 240505 (2012).Article ADS Google Scholar Nautrup, H. P. & Wei, T.-C. Symmetry-protected topologically ordered states for universal quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 92, 52309 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar Liao, P., Sanders, B. C. & Feder, D. L. Topological graph states and quantum error-correction codes. Phys. Rev. A 105, 42418 (2022).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Brown, B. J. & Roberts, S. Universal fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 33305 (2020).Article Google Scholar Cao, S. et al. Generation of genuine entanglement up to 51 superconducting qubits. Nature 619, 738–742 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Ferreira, V. S., Kim, G., Butler, A., Pichler, H. & Painter, O. Deterministic generation of multidimensional photonic cluster states with a single quantum emitter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 260501 (2022).

Google Scholar Paesani, S. & Brown, B. J. High-threshold quantum computing by fusing one-dimensional cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 120603 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Carrera Vazquez, A. et al. Combining quantum processors with real-time classical communication. Nature 636, 75–79 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Lanyon, B. P. et al. Measurement-based quantum computation with trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 210501 (2013).Article ADS Google Scholar Bluvstein, D. et al. A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays. Nature 604, 451–456 (2022).Article ADS Google Scholar Bao, Z. et al. Creating and controlling global Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement on quantum processors. Nat. Commun. 15, 8823 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Song, C. et al. Generation of multicomponent atomic Schrödinger cat states of up to 20 qubits. Science 365, 574–577 (2019).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Cao, H. et al. A photonic source of heralded GHZ states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 130604 (2023).Article Google Scholar Pont, M. et al. High-fidelity four-photon GHZ states on chip. npj Quantum Inf. 9, 50 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Ladd, T. D. et al. Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010).Article ADS Google Scholar Wang, X.-L. et al. 18-qubit entanglement with six photons’ three degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 260502 (2018).Article ADS Google Scholar Omran, A. et al. Generation and manipulation of Schrödinger cat states in Rydberg atom arrays. Science 365, 570–574 (2019).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Gong, M. et al. Genuine 12-qubit entanglement on a superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 110501 (2019).Article ADS Google Scholar Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O. & Rempe, G. Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom. Nature 608, 677–681 (2022).Article ADS Google Scholar Yan, F. et al. Tunable coupling scheme for implementing high-fidelity two-qubit gates. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 54062 (2018).Article Google Scholar Klimov, P. V. et al. Optimizing quantum gates towards the scale of logical qubits. Nat. Commun. 15, 2442 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Sung, Y. et al. Realization of high-fidelity CZ and ZZ-free iSWAP gates with a tunable coupler. Phys. Rev. X 11, 21058 (2021).

Google Scholar Bengtsson, A. et al. Model-based optimization of superconducting qubit readout. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 100603 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Blais, A., Grimsmo, A. L., Girvin, S. M. & Wallraff, A. Circuit quantum electrodynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 25005 (2021).Article MathSciNet Google Scholar Jeffrey, E. et al. Fast accurate state measurement with superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 190504 (2014).Article ADS Google Scholar Macklin, C. et al. A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier. Science 350, 307–310 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar Woods, W. et al. Determining interface dielectric losses in superconducting coplanar-waveguide resonators. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 14012 (2019).Article Google Scholar Murray, C. E., Gambetta, J. M., McClure, D. T. & Steffen, M. Analytical determination of participation in superconducting coplanar architectures. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn. 66, 3724–3733 (2018).Article ADS Google Scholar Wenner, J. et al. Surface loss simulations of superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 113513 (2011).Kamakari, H., Sun, S.-N., Motta, M. & Minnich, A. J. Digital quantum simulation of open quantum systems using quantum imaginary–time evolution. PRX Quantum 3, 10320 (2022).Article Google Scholar Ferracin, S. et al. Efficiently improving the performance of noisy quantum computers. Quantum 8, 1410 (2024).Article Google Scholar Maurya, S., Mude, C. N., Oliver, W. D., Lienhard, B. & Tannu, S. Scaling qubit readout with hardware efficient machine learning architectures. In Proc. 50th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture 1–13 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2023).Karamlou, A. H. et al. Probing entanglement in a 2D hard-core Bose–Hubbard lattice. Nature 629, 561–566 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Guo, Y. & Yang, S. Noise effects on purity and quantum entanglement in terms of physical implementability. npj Quantum Inf. 9, 11 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Krastanov, S., de la Cerda, A. S. & Narang, P. Heterogeneous multipartite entanglement purification for size-constrained quantum devices. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 33164 (2021).Article Google Scholar De Léséleuc, S. et al. Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with rydberg atoms. Science 365, 775–780 (2019).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Walther, P. et al. Experimental one-way quantum computing. Nature 434, 169–176 (2005).Article ADS Google Scholar Tame, M. S. et al. Experimental realization of Deutsch’s algorithm in a one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140501 (2007).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Gühne, O. & Tóth, G. Entanglement detection. Phys. Rep. 474, 1–75 (2009).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Flammia, S. T. & Liu, Y.-K. Direct fidelity estimation from few Pauli measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 230501 (2011).Article ADS Google Scholar Place, A. P. M. et al. New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds. Nat. Commun. 12, 1779 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Wu, Y. et al. Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180501 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Bravyi, S., Sheldon, S., Kandala, A., Mckay, D. C. & Gambetta, J. M. Mitigating measurement errors in multiqubit experiments. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 103, 42605 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Miller, J. & Miyake, A. Resource quality of a symmetry-protected topologically ordered phase for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 120506 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar Chirame, S., Burnell, F. J., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Prem, A. Stable symmetry-protected topological phases in systems with heralded noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 10403 (2025).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Raussendorf, R., Okay, C., Wang, D.-S., Stephen, D. T. & Nautrup, H. P. Computationally universal phase of quantum matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 90501 (2019).Article ADS Google Scholar Stephen, D. T., Wang, D.-S., Prakash, A., Wei, T.-C. & Raussendorf, R. Computational power of symmetry-protected topological phases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 10504 (2017).Article ADS Google Scholar Deutsch, D. & Jozsa, R. Rapid solution of problems by quantum computation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A: Math. Phys. Sci. 439, 553–558 (1992).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Broadbent, A. & Kashefi, E. Parallelizing quantum circuits. Theor. Comput. Sci. 410, 2489–2510 (2009).Article MathSciNet Google Scholar Lee, W.-R., Qin, Z., Raussendorf, R., Sela, E. & Scarola, V. W. Measurement-based time evolution for quantum simulation of fermionic systems. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L032013 (2022).Article Google Scholar de Oliveira, M., Barbosa, L. S. & Galvão, E. F. Quantum advantage in temporally flat measurement-based quantum computation. Quantum 8, 1312 (2024).Article Google Scholar Kaldenbach, T. N. & Heller, M. Mapping quantum circuits to shallow-depth measurement patterns based on graph states. Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 15010 (2024).Article Google Scholar Bourassa, J. E. et al. Blueprint for a scalable photonic fault-tolerant quantum computer. Quantum 5, 392 (2021).Article Google Scholar Brown, B. J., Nickerson, N. H. & Browne, D. E. Fault-tolerant error correction with the gauge color code. Nat. Commun. 7, 12302 (2016).Article ADS Google Scholar Campbell, E. T., Terhal, B. M. & Vuillot, C. Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation. Nature 549, 172–179 (2017).Article ADS Google Scholar Download referencesWe thank R. Jozsa and D. Azses for valuable discussions, the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) Center for Micro- and Nanoscale Research and Fabrication for supporting the sample fabrication and QuantumCTek Co., Ltd. for the manufacture and maintenance of room-temperature electronics equipment.

This research was supported by the Quantum Science and Technology-National Science and Technology Major Project (grant numbers 2021ZD0300200 and 2023ZD0300200), Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies, special funds from Jinan Science and Technology Bureau and Jinan High Tech Zone Management Committee, Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (grant number 2019SHZDZX01), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 92476203, 92476001, 12175003 and 12361161602), NSAF (grant number U2330201), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant number ZR2022LLZ008), Cultivation Project of Shanghai Research Center for Quantum Sciences (grant number LZPY2024), Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2020B0303060001). M.G. was sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers T2322024 and 12474495), Shanghai Rising-Star Program (grant number 23QA1410000) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (grant number 2022460). X. Zhu acknowledges support from the New Cornerstone Science Foundation through the Xplorer Prize and the Taishan Scholars Program.These authors contributed equally: Tao Jiang, Jianbin Cai, Junxiang Huang, Naibin Zhou.Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, ChinaTao Jiang, Jianbin Cai, Naibin Zhou, Sirui Cao, Fusheng Chen, Kefu Chen, Zhiyuan Chen, Zihua Chen, Hui Deng, Daojin Fan, Yuanhao Fu, Dongxin Gao, Cheng Guo, Shaojun Guo, Lianchen Han, Tan He, Yisen Hu, Yong-Heng Huo, Dayu Li, Junyun Li, Na Li, Shaowei Li, Yuhuai Li, Yuan Li, Futian Liang, Jin Lin, Weiping Lin, Yancheng Liu, Yuwei Ma, Haoran Qian, Hao Rong, Tao Rong, Hong Su, Feifan Su, Chenyin Sun, Tianzuo Sun, Chen Wang, Chu Wang, Rui Wang, Zuolin Wei, Dachao Wu, Gang Wu, Yulin Wu, Yu Xu, Kai Yan, Xinpeng Yang, Yangsen Ye, Zhenping Ye, Chong Ying, Jiale Yu, Qinjing Yu, Chen Zha, Shaoyu Zhan, Yiming Zhang, Guming Zhao, Peng Zhao, Youwei Zhao, Qingling Zhu, Qiang Zhang, Chao-Yang Lu, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Ming Gong, Xiaobo Zhu & Jian-Wei PanShanghai Research Center for Quantum Science and CAS Center for Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Shanghai, ChinaTao Jiang, Jianbin Cai, Naibin Zhou, Jiahao Bei, Guoqing Cai, Sirui Cao, Fusheng Chen, Jiang Chen, Kefu Chen, Xiawei Chen, Xiqing Chen, Zhiyuan Chen, Zihua Chen, Hui Deng, Zhibin Deng, Pei Ding, Zhuzhengqi Ding, Shuai Dong, Bo Fan, Daojin Fan, Yuanhao Fu, Dongxin Gao, Lei Ge, Cheng Guo, Shaojun Guo, Xiaoyang Guo, Lianchen Han, Tan He, Yisen Hu, Yong-Heng Huo, Zuokai Jiang, Honghong Jin, Yunxiang Leng, Dayu Li, Fangyu Li, Jiaqi Li, Junyan Li, Junyun Li, Na Li, Shaowei Li, Wei Li, Yuhuai Li, Yuan Li, Futian Liang, Nanxing Liao, Jin Lin, Weiping Lin, Hongxiu Liu, Yancheng Liu, Haoxin Lou, Yuwei Ma, Lingxin Meng, Hao Mou, Binghan Nie, Meijuan Nie, Le Niu, Haoran Qian, Hao Rong, Tao Rong, Qiong Shen, Hong Su, Feifan Su, Chenyin Sun, Tianzuo Sun, Yimeng Tan, Longyue Tang, Chen Wang, Chu Wang, Liangyuan Wang, Rui Wang, Zuolin Wei, Dachao Wu, Gang Wu, Yulin Wu, Yu Xu, Kai Yan, Xinpeng Yang, Yang Yang, Yangsen Ye, Zhenping Ye, Chong Ying, Jiale Yu, Qinjing Yu, Wenhu Yu, Xiangdong Zeng, Chen Zha, Shaoyu Zhan, Feifei Zhang, Kaili Zhang, Wen Zhang, Yiming Zhang, Guming Zhao, Peng Zhao, Xintao Zhao, Youwei Zhao, Luyuan Zheng, Na Zhou, Qingling Zhu, Haonan Zou, Qiang Zhang, Chao-Yang Lu, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Ming Gong, Xiaobo Zhu & Jian-Wei PanHefei National Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, ChinaTao Jiang, Jianbin Cai, Naibin Zhou, Sirui Cao, Fusheng Chen, Kefu Chen, Zhiyuan Chen, Zihua Chen, Hui Deng, Xun Ding, Daojin Fan, Yuanhao Fu, Dongxin Gao, Jiacheng Gui, Cheng Guo, Shaojun Guo, Lianchen Han, Tan He, Yisen Hu, Yong-Heng Huo, Dayu Li, Jinjin Li, Junyun Li, Na Li, Shaowei Li, Yuhuai Li, Yuan Li, Futian Liang, Jin Lin, Weiping Lin, Dailin Liu, Xinyu Liu, Yancheng Liu, Yuwei Ma, Kailiang Nan, Wenyi Peng, Haoran Qian, Hao Rong, Tao Rong, Hong Su, Feifan Su, Chenyin Sun, Tianzuo Sun, Jun Tan, Chen Wang, Chu Wang, Jian Wang, Rui Wang, Shengtao Wang, Xinzhe Wang, Zuolin Wei, Dachao Wu, Gang Wu, Jin Wu, Yulin Wu, Shiyong Xie, Yu Xu, Kai Yan, Xinpeng Yang, Yangsen Ye, Zhenping Ye, Chong Ying, Jiale Yu, Qinjing Yu, Xiangdong Zeng, Chen Zha, Shaoyu Zhan, Haibin Zhang, Yiming Zhang, Yongzhuo Zhang, Guming Zhao, Peng Zhao, Youwei Zhao, Shifeng Zhou, Shuang Zhou, Zhengxiao Zhou, Chengjun Zhu, Qingling Zhu, Guihong Zou, Qiang Zhang, Chao-Yang Lu, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Ming Gong, Xiaobo Zhu & Jian-Wei PanCenter on Frontiers of Computing Studies, Peking University, Beijing, ChinaJunxiang Huang, Yukun Zhang & Xiao YuanSchool of Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing, ChinaJunxiang Huang, Yukun Zhang & Xiao YuanQuantumCTek Co., Ltd., Hefei, ChinaZhe Chen, Wenhao Chu, Linyin Hong, Dongdong Li, Xuemeng Liu, Huiyan Shen, Liangchao Sun, Yingxiu Sun, Wenbing Tu, Jiafei Wang, Biao Wang, Chang Wang, Jiazhou Wei, Chun Xue, Weifeng Yang, Lixiang Zhang, Zhong Zhao & Liang ZhouHenan Key Laboratory of Quantum Information and Cryptography, Zhengzhou, ChinaHe-Liang HuangNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, ChinaJinjin LiJinan Institute of Quantum Technology and Hefei National Laboratory Jinan Branch, Jinan, ChinaXuelian Liang, Jie Ning, Xiaomin Wang, Xunxun Wang, Yeru Wang, Lianjie Xin, Fei Zhou, Qiang Zhang & Xiaobo ZhuSchool of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi’an, ChinaMaliang LiuUniversity of Science and Technology of China, Shanghai Research Institute, Shanghai, ChinaGang WuSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarX. Yuan, M.G., X. Zhu and J.-W.P. conceived the research and designed the experiment. Development of the experimental system, device fabrication, experimentation, data analysis, and the writing and revision of the manuscript were carried out collaboratively by all authors.Correspondence to Xiao Yuan, Ming Gong, Xiaobo Zhu or Jian-Wei Pan.The authors declare no competing interests.Nature Physics thanks Christian Andersen and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Supplementary Sections I–VI, Figs. 1–25, Tables I–IX and Discussion.Statistical source data.Statistical source data.Statistical source data.Statistical source data.Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.Reprints and permissionsJiang, T., Cai, J., Huang, J. et al. One- and two-dimensional cluster states for topological phase simulation and measurement-based quantum computation. Nat. Phys. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026-03179-6Download citationReceived: 13 May 2025Accepted: 09 January 2026Published: 11 March 2026Version of record: 11 March 2026DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026-03179-6Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Read Original

Tags

photonic-quantum

Source Information

Source: Nature Physics – Quantum