Back to News
quantum-computing

Observation of dissipationless fractional Chern insulator

Nature Physics – Quantum
Loading...
18 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers achieved the first dissipationless fractional Chern insulator in a twisted MoTe₂ bilayer device, eliminating longitudinal resistance while maintaining quantized anomalous Hall resistance at zero magnetic field. The breakthrough resolves a key challenge—prior fractional Chern insulators suffered energy loss due to sample imperfections—by demonstrating vanishing resistance, confirming true dissipationless transport. Thermal activation gap behavior revealed two distinct quasiparticle channels: spinful excitations dominate at low magnetic fields, while spinless ones take over at high fields due to Zeeman splitting suppression. Experiments showed the gap decreases rapidly with magnetic field before plateauing, contrasting with traditional fractional quantum Hall states where gaps increase with field strength. This advance paves the way for quantum engineering of correlated topological states, offering new insights into energy scales and potential applications in fault-tolerant quantum computing.
Observation of dissipationless fractional Chern insulator

Summarize this article with:

Nature Physics (2026)Cite this article The fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect has recently been experimentally observed in fractional Chern insulators at zero magnetic field. However, an outstanding challenge is the presence of substantial longitudinal resistance, even though the anomalous Hall resistance is quantized. This dissipation is probably linked to imperfect sample quality. Here we demonstrate a twisted MoTe2 bilayer device that exhibits quantized anomalous Hall resistance and vanishing longitudinal resistance for the fractional state, such that it is a dissipationless fractional Chern insulator. Unlike fractional quantum Hall states, where the energy gap increases with magnetic field, the thermal activation gap of the fractional state decreases rapidly with magnetic field and then plateaus above a few teslas. This behaviour reflects the coexistence of two distinct excitation channels: spinful quasiparticles dominate transport at low magnetic fields whereas spinless quasiparticles govern transport at high fields, where Zeeman splitting suppresses spin-flip processes. Our results provide insights into the energy scale of fractional Chern insulators and indicate a pathway to the quantum engineering of exotic correlated topological states.This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel any timeSubscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $259.00 per yearonly $21.58 per issueBuy this articleUSD 39.95Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkoutThe raw datasets underlying the colour plots are large and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.Neupert, T., Santos, L., Chamon, C. & Mudry, C. Fractional quantum Hall states at zero magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236804 (2011).Article ADS Google Scholar Sheng, D., Gu, Z.-C., Sun, K. & Sheng, L. Fractional quantum Hall effect in the absence of Landau levels. Nat. Commun. 2, 389 (2011).Article ADS Google Scholar Regnault, N. & Bernevig, B. A. Fractional Chern insulator. Phys. Rev. X 1, 021014 (2011).

Google Scholar Tang, E., Mei, J.-W. & Wen, X.-G. High-temperature fractional quantum Hall states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236802 (2011).Article ADS Google Scholar Sun, K., Gu, Z., Katsura, H. & Das Sarma, S. Nearly flatbands with nontrivial topology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236803 (2011).Article ADS Google Scholar Xiao, D., Zhu, W., Ran, Y., Nagaosa, N. & Okamoto, S. Interface engineering of quantum Hall effects in digital transition metal oxide heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 2, 596 (2011).Article ADS Google Scholar Tsui, D. C., Stormer, H. L. & Gossard, A. C. Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559 (1982).Article ADS Google Scholar Laughlin, R. B. Anomalous quantum Hall effect: an incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395 (1983).Article ADS Google Scholar Chernikov, A. et al. Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic Rydberg series in monolayer WS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076802 (2014).Article ADS Google Scholar Park, H. et al. Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect. Nature 622, 74–79 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Xu, F. et al. Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous Hall effects in twisted bilayer MoTe2. Phys. Rev. X 13, 031037 (2023).

Google Scholar Cai, J. et al. Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe2. Nature 622, 63–68 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Zeng, Y. et al. Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moiré MoTe2. Nature 622, 69–73 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Ji, Z. et al. Local probe of bulk and edge states in a fractional Chern insulator. Nature 635, 578–583 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Redekop, E. et al. Direct magnetic imaging of fractional Chern insulators in twisted MoTe2. Nature 635, 584–589 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Park, H. et al. Ferromagnetism and topology of the higher flat band in a fractional Chern insulator. Nat. Phys. 21, 549–555 (2025).Xu, F. et al. Interplay between topology and correlations in the second moiré band of twisted bilayer MoTe2. Nat. Phys. 21, 542–548 (2025).Lu, Z. et al. Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene. Nature 626, 759–764 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Lu, Z. et al. Extended quantum anomalous Hall states in graphene/hBN moiré superlattices. Nature 637, 1090–1095 (2025).Article ADS Google Scholar Choi, Y. et al. Superconductivity and quantized anomalous Hall effect in rhombohedral graphene. Nature 639, 342–347 (2025).Xie, J. et al. Tunable fractional Chern insulators in rhombohedral graphene superlattices. Nat. Mater. 24, 1042–1048 (2025).Aronson, S. H. et al. Displacement field-controlled fractional Chern insulators and charge density waves in a graphene/hBN moiré superlattice. Phys. Rev. X 15, 031026 (2025).

Google Scholar Jain, J. K. Composite Fermions (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).Halperin, B. I. & Jain, J. K.

Fractional Quantum Hall Effects: New Developments (World Scientific, 2020).Chung, Y. J. et al. Ultra-high-quality two-dimensional electron systems. Nat. Mater. 20, 632–637 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Anderson, E. et al. Programming correlated magnetic states with gate-controlled moiré geometry. Science 381, 325–330 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Xia, Y. et al. Superconductivity in twisted bilayer WSe2. Nature 637, 833–838 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Knüppel, P. et al. Correlated states controlled by a tunable van Hove singularity in moiré WSe2 bilayers. Nat. Commun. 16, 1959 (2025).Article ADS Google Scholar Dong, J., Wang, J., Ledwith, P. J., Vishwanath, A. & Parker, D. E. Composite Fermi liquid at zero magnetic field in twisted MoTe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 136502 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Goldman, H., Reddy, A. P., Paul, N. & Fu, L. Zero-field composite Fermi liquid in twisted semiconductor bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 136501 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Anderson, E. et al. Magnetoelectric control of helical light emission in a moiré Chern magnet. Phys. Rev. X 15, 031057 (2025).

Google Scholar Schulze-Wischeler, F., Mariani, E., Hohls, F. & Haug, R. J. Direct measurement of the g factor of composite fermions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 156401 (2004).Article ADS Google Scholar Gonçalves, M. et al. Spinless and spinful charge excitations in moiré fractional Chern insulators. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05330 (2025).Girvin, S., MacDonald, A. & Platzman, P. Magneto-roton theory of collective excitations in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 33, 2481 (1986).Article ADS Google Scholar Pinczuk, A., Dennis, B., Pfeiffer, L. & West, K. Observation of collective excitations in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3983 (1993).Article ADS Google Scholar Nakajima, T. & Aoki, H. Composite-fermion picture for the spin-wave excitation in the fractional quantum Hall system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3568 (1994).Article ADS Google Scholar Halperin, B. I., Lee, P. A. & Read, N. Theory of the half-filled Landau level. Phys. Rev. B 47, 7312 (1993).Article ADS Google Scholar Stern, A. & Halperin, B. I. Singularities in the Fermi-liquid description of a partially filled Landau level and the energy gaps of fractional quantum Hall states. Phys. Rev. B 52, 5890 (1995).Article ADS Google Scholar Nayak, C. & Wilczek, F. Non-Fermi liquid fixed point in 2 + 1 dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 417, 359–373 (1994).Article ADS Google Scholar Morf, R., d’Ambrumenil, N. & Sarma, S. D. Excitation gaps in fractional quantum Hall states: an exact diagonalization study. Phys. Rev. B 66, 075408 (2002).Article ADS Google Scholar Boebinger, G. et al. Activation energies and localization in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 36, 7919 (1987).Article ADS Google Scholar Willett, R., Stormer, H., Tsui, D., Gossard, A. & English, J. Quantitative experimental test for the theoretical gap energies in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 37, 8476 (1988).Article ADS Google Scholar Du, R., Stormer, H., Tsui, D., Pfeiffer, L. & West, K. Experimental evidence for new particles in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2944 (1993).Article ADS Google Scholar Manoharan, H., Shayegan, M. & Klepper, S. Signatures of a novel Fermi liquid in a two-dimensional composite particle metal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3270 (1994).Article ADS Google Scholar Villegas Rosales, K. et al. Fractional quantum Hall effect energy gaps: role of electron layer thickness. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 056801 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Wu, F., Lovorn, T., Tutuc, E., Martin, I. & MacDonald, A. Topological insulators in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 086402 (2019).Article ADS Google Scholar Angeli, M. & MacDonald, A. H. Γ valley transition metal dichalcogenide moiré bands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2021826118 (2021).Article Google Scholar Zhang, X.-W. et al. Polarization-driven band topology evolution in twisted MoTe2 and WSe2. Nat. Commun. 15, 4223 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Yu, J. et al. Fractional Chern insulators versus nonmagnetic states in twisted bilayer MoTe2. Phys. Rev. B 109, 045147 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Xu, C., Li, J., Xu, Y., Bi, Z. & Zhang, Y. Maximally localized Wannier functions, interaction models, and fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in twisted bilayer MoTe2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2316749121 (2024).Article Google Scholar Abouelkomsan, A., Reddy, A. P., Fu, L. & Bergholtz, E. J. Band mixing in the quantum anomalous Hall regime of twisted semiconductor bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 109, L121107 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Éfros, A. L. & Shklovskii, B. I. Coulomb gap and low temperature conductivity of disordered systems. J. Phys. C 8, L49 (1975).Article ADS Google Scholar Shklovskii, B. I. & Efros, A. L. in Electronic Properties of Doped Semiconductors 202–227 (Springer Nature, 1984).Wang, M., Wang, X. & Vafek, O. Phase diagram of twisted bilayer MoTe2 in a magnetic field with an account for the electron–electron interaction. Phys. Rev. B 110, L201107 (2024).Article ADS Google Scholar Zhang, S. et al. VASP2KP: k⋅p models and Landé g-factors from ab initio calculations. Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 127101 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Download referencesWe thank J. Cai, S. Yuan and Y.-F. Zhao for insightful discussions. The project was mainly supported by Programmable Quantum Materials, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by DOE BES (Award No. DE-SC0019443). K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the JSPS (KAKENHI Grant Nos. 20H00354, 21H05233 and 23H02052) and the World Premier International Research Center Initiative, MEXT, Japan. B.A.B. was supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Grant Nos. GBMF8685 and GBMF11070), ONR (Grant No. N00014-20-1-2303), the Simons Foundation (Grant Nos. 404513 and SFI-MPS-NFS-00006741-01), the NSF-MERSEC (Grant Nos. MERSEC DMR 2011750), the Schmidt Foundation at Princeton University and the European Research Council (Grant No. 101020833).

The Flatiron Institute is a division of the Simons Foundation.Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAHeonjoon Park, Weijie Li, Chaowei Hu, Christiano Beach, David Cobden, Jiun-Haw Chu, Di Xiao & Xiaodong XuDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USAMiguel Gonçalves, Juan Felipe Mendez-Valderrama, Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, B. Andrei Bernevig & Nicolas RegnaultResearch Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, JapanTakashi TaniguchiResearch Center for Electronic and Optical Materials, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, JapanKenji WatanabeDepartment of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USALiang FuDonostia International Physics Center, Donostia/San Sebastian, SpainB. Andrei BernevigIKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, SpainB. Andrei BernevigCenter for Computational Quantum Physics, Flatiron Institute, New York, NY, USANicolas RegnaultLaboratoire de Physique de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, ENS, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, FranceNicolas RegnaultDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADi Xiao & Xiaodong XuSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarX.X. conceived and supervised the project. H.P. fabricated the samples and performed the transport measurements. W.L. performed the RMCD measurements with support from C.B. H.P., D.C., L.F., B.A.B., N.R., D.X. and X.X. analysed and interpreted the results. M.G., J.F.M.-V., J.H.-A., D.X., B.A.B. and N.R. performed the magnetic-field-dependent gap analysis. T.T. and K.W. synthesized the hBN crystals. C.H. and J.-H.C. grew and characterized the bulk MoTe2 crystals. H.P., D.X. and X.X. wrote the paper with input from all authors. All authors discussed the results.Correspondence to Xiaodong Xu.The authors declare no competing interests.Nature Physics thanks Rafael Luque Merino and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.a, Schematic of horizontal flux transport growth of MoTe2 crystal in Te flux under temperature gradient from T1 = 600 °C to T2 = 550 °C. b, 200 × 200 nm2 conductive atomic force microscopy (c-AFM) image taken on exfoliated bulk commercial crystals under Vbias = 1.3 V showing several types of defects with the total concentration on the order of 1011 cm−2. The exact defect types are not known. c, 500\(\times\)500 nm2 c-AFM image taken on exfoliated bulk crystals grown by horizontal flux transport (see Methods). The applied Vbias = 0.9 V. A single type of defects is highlighted in blue circles with density of 2 × 109 cm−2. d, 200 × 200 nm2 c-AFM image taken within the orange box in c.a-d, Each row displays, from top to bottom, the device schematic, optical image, and atomic force microscopy (AFM) image. a, Bottom gate structure featuring pre-patterned platinum (Pt) electrodes on an hBN/graphite stack. b, Placement of the hBN/tMoTe2 stack onto the bottom gate. Inset: Optical image of a monolayer MoTe2 flake bisected using an AFM tip. c, Patterning of Pt contact gates on top of each Pt electrode. d, Transfer of the top gate structure (hBN/graphite/hBN) onto the device. e, Contact-mode AFM images taken after hBN/tMoTe2 transfer in b, illustrating the progressive removal of bubbles outside the Hall bar region. Scale bars: 5 μm (optical images), 2 μm (AFM images).a, AFM image after Pt contact-gate (CG) deposition. Scale bar: 1 µm. b, c, Cross-sectional schematics (top) and energy diagrams (bottom) of the contact region without (b) and with (c) a contact gate. Contact between Pt and the TMD induces strong charge transfer, resulting in a “metallized” TMD. Strain and disorder at the 1D interface between this region and the intrinsic channel create localized in-gap states that form a Schottky barrier. A large negative CG voltage introduces a fringe field that gradually dopes these interface states, reducing the barrier height.d, Misaligned CG layout that covers only one side of the contact, leaving a Schottky barrier on the opposite side. This design blocks hole transport through single-gated or monolayer regions, suppressing parasitic conduction. The bulb-shaped contact gate end ensures current flows only within the Hall-bar channel. e, f, Four-terminal (Rxx, e) and two-terminal (R2T, f) resistances versus dual-gate voltages for the device in the main text, measured at 4 K. g-i, In contrast, devices where the CG fully overlaps the contact exhibit parallel conduction channels (g) and corresponding features in Rxx (h) and R2T (i) aligned with a single gate (black arrows), including abrupt drops in R2T at large negative top-gate voltages. The absence of such features in the main device confirms effective suppression of parallel conduction by the misaligned CG design.a, Longitudinal (Rxx) resistance as a function of filling factor (ν) and electric field (D/ε0) at 10 mK. b, Linecut of Rxx as a function of filling factor at D/ε0 = 25 mV/nm. The Rxx is symmetrized at |µ0H | = ±0 mT by initializing the device at ±0.2 T and sweeping down the magnetic field to zero. The observed phase diagram is the same as the one shown in Fig. 1c, except small fluctuations in Rxx due to spin fluctuations during carrier density sweeps. c, Rxx and d, -Rxy as a function of magnetic field (µ0H) and filling factor (ν). Data is symmetrized and antisymmetrized, respectively. e, Linecuts of Rxx at various magnetic fields. The peak position of ν = -3/2 does not disperse, indicative of a topologically trivial charge-ordered state.Source dataa-b, Longitudinal resistance Rxx (a) and Hall resistance -Rxy (b) as functions of electric field D/ε0 at various filling factors (ν), symmetrized and antisymmetrized, respectively at µ0H = ±200mT. Near but below ν = -1, the system remains in a quantum anomalous Hall state even at finite D/ε0 ≈ 75 mV/nm, with vanishing Rxx and quantized -Rxy ≈ h/e2. As the filling increases, the system transitions into a ferromagnetic metal near D/ε0 ≈ 0, and a nonmagnetic metal at larger |D/ε0 | . c-d, Temperature-dependent Rxx versus D/ε0 at ν = -2/3 (c) and ν = -3/5 (d). At low electric fields, Rxx vanishes, indicating an incompressible FCI state. Increasing D/ε0 drives a sharp transition to a charge-ordered insulator, followed by metallic behavior at higher fields. e-f, Arrhenius fits of Rxx at ν = -2/3 (e) and ν = -3/5 (f) used to extract the energy gaps of the charge-ordered insulating states, assuming Rxx ~ R0 exp(-Δ/2kBT), where Δ is the energy gap. g, Extracted gaps Δ as a function of D/ε0 for both fillings. Across the charge-ordered regime, the ν = -3/5 state consistently exhibits smaller gaps than ν = -2/3. Error bars indicate uncertainty in the fitted activation gap Δ from Arrhenius fits, with data points representing best-fit values. Data are from a single twisted MoTe2 bilayer device (n = 1). No biological or technical replicates or control groups were used.Source dataa, Symmetrized Rxx and antisymmetrized -Rxy at µ0H = ± 150 mT for the -2/3 FCI state. Rxx ≈ -Rxy around a temperature of 5 K. b, c, and d, similar measurements as (a) for the -3/5, -4/7, and -5/9 FCI state. e, Arrhenius plot of Rxx for the -2/3, -3/5, -4/7, and -5/9. The extracted thermal activation gap is shown in the inset for the -2/3 and -3/5 state, where the line is a guide to the eye for the expected scaling behavior for the fractional quantum Hall states as a reference. Error bars indicate uncertainty in the fitted activation gap Δ from Arrhenius fits, with data points representing best-fit values. Data are from a single twisted MoTe2 bilayer device (n = 1). No biological or technical replicates or control groups were used.Source dataFor each panel, the corresponding magnetic field is marked on the top.RMCD as a function of ν and D/ε0 at different temperatures (T), measured at a small field of 5 mT. The ferromagnetic signal at ν = -2/3 disappears around 4-5 K while the ν = -1 signal persists up to approximately 13-14 K, consistent with the temperature dependence of Rxy.a, RMCD as a function of filling (ν) and temperature (T) for the device discussed in the main text, measured at a small magnetic field of 30mT and electric field D/ε0 = 0. b, Linecut of RMCD vs ν at T = 1.6 K, which shows a monotonic decrease from ν = -1 to -2/3. c-f, (top) The hysteretic component of RMCD (ΔRMCD) as a function of magnetic field and temperature for the Jain sequence fractional fillings ν = -2/3, -3/5, -4/7, -5/9, respectively. (bottom) Linecuts at different temperatures extracted from the colorplot. The Curie temperature decreases at higher order filling factors.Source dataa, Raw data for the longitudinal resistance Rxx at different temperatures and magnetic fields, together with an example fit (solid line) to Eq.3 by selecting the data for \(0.15{{\rm{K}}}^{-1} < {T}^{-1} < 0.35{{\rm{K}}}^{-1}\) and \({R}_{{\rm{xx}}} < 7.5{\rm{k}}\Omega\). The different magnetic fields are color-coded according to the legend. The extracted fitted parameters are \({\varDelta }_{{FCI}}=19.9\pm 0.3{\rm{K}}\), \({\varDelta }_{S}^{0}=55\pm 2{\rm{K}}\), \({g}^{* }=19.3\pm 0.8\) and \(\alpha =(4\pm 1)\times {10}^{-3}\). b-d, Best-fit parameters for different choices of data selection. These include different choices of truncation ranging from \(0.1{{\rm{K}}}^{-1} < {T}_{\max }^{-1} < 0.2{{\rm{K}}}^{-1}\) (always considering \({T}^{-1} < 0.35{{\rm{K}}}^{-1}\)) and \(5{\rm{k}}\Omega < {R}_{{\rm{xx}}}^{\max } < 10{\rm{k}}\Omega\), where \({T}_{\max }\) and \({R}_{{\rm{xx}}}^{\max }\) are respectively the maximum considered temperatures and resistances. We also tested the impact of fitting with larger weight in the small \(B\) data, where the most notable variations occur. We used different weighting functions \(f(B)=({({B}_{\max }-B)/{B}_{\max })}^{\eta }\), with \(\eta =\mathrm{0,1,2}\) indicated by the different colors of the data points in the figure, and \({B}_{\max }=8{\rm{T}}\). Error bars indicate uncertainty in the fitted parameters, with data points representing best-fit values. Data are from a single twisted MoTe2 bilayer device (n = 1). No biological or technical replicates or control groups were used.Statistical data for Fig. 2.Statistical data for Fig. 3.Statistical data for Fig. 4.Statistical data for Extended Data Fig. 4.Statistical data for Extended Data Fig. 5.Statistical data for Extended Data Fig. 6.Statistical data for Extended Data Fig. 9.Statistical data for Extended Data Fig. 10.Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.Reprints and permissionsPark, H., Li, W., Hu, C. et al. Observation of dissipationless fractional Chern insulator. Nat. Phys. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-03167-2Download citationReceived: 10 March 2025Accepted: 31 December 2025Published: 30 January 2026Version of record: 30 January 2026DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-03167-2Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Read Original

Source Information

Source: Nature Physics – Quantum