Back to News
quantum-computing

ngl i used IBM Quantum to pick lotto numbers and now i have rejection-sampling questions

Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)
Loading...
1 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A hobbyist used IBM’s quantum hardware to generate lottery numbers for PCSO, UK Lotto, and US Powerball by mapping qubit outputs to number ranges, replacing pseudorandom methods with quantum randomness. The project employed rejection sampling to handle non-power-of-two ranges (e.g., 1–42 or 1–55), discarding invalid outputs—a process the developer calls inefficient but necessary for uniformity. A secondary filter retries if outputs show statistical skew, though the creator questions whether this reintroduces bias, seeking validation from the quantum computing community. Despite using quantum randomness, the method doesn’t improve lottery odds—it merely ensures provable randomness, a novelty over classical pseudorandom number generators. Key technical questions remain: optimizing range mapping to reduce waste and verifying whether the skew filter compromises randomness integrity.
ngl i used IBM Quantum to pick lotto numbers and now i have rejection-sampling questions

Summarize this article with:

hobby project. small circuit on real IBM Quantum hardware, mapped the bitstrings to lotto number ranges (PCSO 6/42–6/58, UK lotto, US powerball). rejection sampling for non-power-of-2 ranges + a filter that retries on obviously skewed combos. does NOT improve odds obviously — same math, just true-random instead of pseudo-random. mostly built it for the bit. questions: rejection sampling for 1-42 / 1-55 — is there a smarter mapping i'm missing? feels wasteful tbh the skew filter retrying on bad combos — does it leak bias back in? gut says no but want a sanity check link in comments if mods are cool with it. submitted by /u/katmon_01 [link] [comments]

Read Original

Tags

government-funding
quantum-hardware
ibm

Source Information

Source: Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)