Back to News
quantum-computing

The Need for Quantitative Resilience Models and Metrics in Classical-Quantum Computing Systems

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Hybrid classical-quantum systems face growing dependability challenges as HPC and QPU integration deepens, requiring resilience to shift from an afterthought to a foundational design constraint, according to a March 2026 analysis. The paper argues for quantitative resilience models to assess vulnerabilities across the computing stack, proposing civil engineering methodologies to evaluate system robustness at multiple architectural layers. A key innovation is linking end-user value to vulnerability propagation, quantifying how failures at one stack level cascade upward and impact performance or security. New resilience metrics could clarify cost-benefit tradeoffs in quantum technology stacks, helping prioritize improvements by measuring their cascading effects on system reliability and user outcomes. The work emphasizes separating concerns across layers to optimize resilience investments, demanding precise value estimates to guide future HPC-QPU integration strategies.
The Need for Quantitative Resilience Models and Metrics in Classical-Quantum Computing Systems

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2603.06709 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 5 Mar 2026] Title:The Need for Quantitative Resilience Models and Metrics in Classical-Quantum Computing Systems Authors:Santiago Núñez-Corrales View a PDF of the paper titled The Need for Quantitative Resilience Models and Metrics in Classical-Quantum Computing Systems, by Santiago N\'u\~nez-Corrales View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Increasingly deeper integration of HPC resources and QPUs unveils new challenges in computer architecture and engineering. As a consequence, dependability arises again as a concern encompassing resilience, reproducibility and security. The properties of quantum computing systems involve a reinterpretation of these factors in retrodictive, predictive, and prescriptive ways. We state here that resilience must become an \emph{a priori} design constraint rather than an afterthought of HPC-QPU integration. This article describes the need for conceptual and quantitative models to estimate and assess the resilience hybrid classical-quantum computing infrastructure. We suggest how resilience methods in civil engineering can apply at various levels of the classical-quantum computing stack. We also discuss implications of a model of end-user value for the estimation of consequences resulting from the propagation of vulnerabilities from a given level of the stack upwards. Finally, we argue in favor of new resilience models can help the impact of improving specific components in quantum technology stacks to provide a clearer picture about the value of separation of concerns across different layers. Ultimately, HPC-QPU integration will increasingly demand more precise statements about the cost-benefit ratio of specific system improvements and their cascading consequences against estimates of delivered value to users. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET) Cite as: arXiv:2603.06709 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2603.06709v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.06709 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Santiago Nunez-Corrales [view email] [v1] Thu, 5 Mar 2026 19:07:43 UTC (2,809 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled The Need for Quantitative Resilience Models and Metrics in Classical-Quantum Computing Systems, by Santiago N\'u\~nez-CorralesView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.DC cs.ET References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-computing

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics