Back to News
quantum-computing

Learning Mid-circuit Measurement Backaction from Three Repeated Measurements

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers from Liang Jiang’s team introduced a breakthrough protocol to characterize mid-circuit measurements (MCMs) in quantum computing, addressing their dual role in producing classical outcomes while altering quantum states. The method uses just three repeated measurements on a maximally mixed qubit input to fully determine a single-qubit MCM’s parameters, except for one gauge degree of freedom, which physical constraints narrow into precise error intervals. Implemented on IBM’s superconducting processors, the protocol achieved a 100x improvement in Pauli-observable prediction accuracy compared to traditional confusion-matrix models, revealing dominant T₁-decay backaction effects. Unlike prior approaches, this technique preserves critical readout-backaction correlations and excitation-decay asymmetries, which Pauli-error models typically erase, enabling more accurate noise characterization. The findings provide a scalable tool for SPAM error separation, reset optimization, and noise-aware quantum error correction, advancing dynamic-circuit operations like syndrome extraction and measurement-based resets.
Learning Mid-circuit Measurement Backaction from Three Repeated Measurements

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2606.00433 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 29 May 2026] Title:Learning Mid-circuit Measurement Backaction from Three Repeated Measurements Authors:Chia-Tung Chu, Su-un Lee, Han Zheng, Senrui Chen, Bibek Pokharel, Alireza Seif, Liang Jiang View a PDF of the paper titled Learning Mid-circuit Measurement Backaction from Three Repeated Measurements, by Chia-Tung Chu and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Accurate modeling of mid-circuit measurements (MCMs) is essential for dynamic-circuit operations such as syndrome extraction, measurement-based reset, and the separation of state-preparation and measurement (SPAM) error. Unlike terminal measurement, a noisy MCM both produces a classical outcome and alters the incoming quantum state, thereby influencing subsequent circuit operations. This makes conventional confusion-matrix or fidelity-level characterization insufficient. Here we introduce an efficient, self-consistent protocol for learning a single-qubit Z-twirled MCM instrument, retaining the readout-backaction correlations and excitation-decay asymmetry that are erased in Pauli-error descriptions. Remarkably, readout bit strings from only three repeated MCMs on a maximally mixed input determine all learnable parameters of the reduced instrument, up to a single unidentifiable gauge degree of freedom. Physicality constraints convert this non-identifiability into narrow, gauge-aware error intervals. Implemented on IBM superconducting processors, the learned instrument improves Pauli-observable prediction by ${\sim}100\times$ over a conventional confusion-matrix model and reveals a $T_1$-decay dominated backaction. Our protocol provides a compact characterization layer for SPAM error separation, reset optimization, and noise-aware quantum error correction. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2606.00433 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2606.00433v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.00433 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Chia-Tung Chu [view email] [v1] Fri, 29 May 2026 23:47:39 UTC (415 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Learning Mid-circuit Measurement Backaction from Three Repeated Measurements, by Chia-Tung Chu and 6 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-06 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-hardware
quantum-error-correction

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics