Back to News
quantum-computing

Leakage Suppression in Quantum Control via Static Parameter Offsets

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers from China propose a novel method to suppress quantum leakage errors by applying static offsets to tunable system parameters, achieving high-fidelity operations without modifying existing control frameworks. The technique eliminates the need for additional suppression pulses or complex optimizations, offering a time-efficient solution compatible with superconducting quantum circuits and multi-level systems. Numerical simulations validate its effectiveness in single-qubit gates, two-qubit interactions, and perfect state transfer, demonstrating broad applicability in quantum control tasks. When combined with optimal control methods, the approach simultaneously mitigates leakage and residual crosstalk, addressing two major error sources in quantum computation. This advancement provides a practical pathway toward fault-tolerant quantum computing by systematically lowering error thresholds through minimal hardware adjustments.
Leakage Suppression in Quantum Control via Static Parameter Offsets

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2604.03726 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 4 Apr 2026] Title:Leakage Suppression in Quantum Control via Static Parameter Offsets Authors:Ting Lin, Zi-Hao Qin, Zheng-Yuan Xue, Tao Chen View a PDF of the paper titled Leakage Suppression in Quantum Control via Static Parameter Offsets, by Ting Lin and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:High-fidelity quantum operations require the system dynamics to be strictly confined to the computational subspace. In practice, however, control fields inevitably couple to leakage levels, giving rise to quantum state leakage that significantly reduces the fidelity of the operation. To address this challenge, we propose a general strategy for actively suppressing leakage errors by applying small, static offsets to tunable system parameters. This approach systematically mitigates leakage's detrimental impact on quantum control, without modifying the original control framework or incurring additional time overhead. By avoiding the need for extra suppression pulses or complex optimization procedures altogether, it offers a streamlined solution for leakage compensation while remaining fully compatible with subsequent optimal control techniques. Numerical validation conducted on superconducting quantum circuits demonstrates effective leakage suppression, enabling high-fidelity single-qubit gates, precise control of two-qubit interactions, and perfect state transfer in multi-level systems. Moreover, when integrated with optimal control techniques, our approach also allows for the cooperative suppression of both leakage errors and residual crosstalk. Therefore, this work provides a feasible technical pathway toward the low error thresholds required for fault-tolerant quantum computation. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2604.03726 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2604.03726v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.03726 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Tao Chen [view email] [v1] Sat, 4 Apr 2026 13:13:45 UTC (2,722 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Leakage Suppression in Quantum Control via Static Parameter Offsets, by Ting Lin and 3 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-04 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

superconducting-qubits
quantum-investment
government-funding
quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics