Back to News
quantum-computing

Impact of Circuit Depth versus Qubit Count on Variational Quantum Classifiers for Higgs Boson Signal Detection

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A January 2026 study reveals that deeper quantum circuits outperform wider ones for Higgs boson detection, achieving 56.2% accuracy—4.3% higher than baseline—using variational quantum classifiers on LHC data. Researchers reduced 30 ATLAS experiment features to 4- and 8-qubit spaces via PCA, testing shallow/deep 4-qubit and expanded 8-qubit circuits on NISQ devices. The 8-qubit configuration underperformed (50.6% accuracy) due to barren plateaus, highlighting optimization challenges in larger Hilbert spaces for current quantum hardware. Findings suggest circuit depth and entanglement layers are more critical than qubit count for near-term quantum machine learning in high-energy physics applications. This work underscores the need for architecture optimization over raw scaling, offering a roadmap for quantum-enhanced anomaly detection in particle physics datasets.
Impact of Circuit Depth versus Qubit Count on Variational Quantum Classifiers for Higgs Boson Signal Detection

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2601.11937 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 17 Jan 2026] Title:Impact of Circuit Depth versus Qubit Count on Variational Quantum Classifiers for Higgs Boson Signal Detection Authors:Fatih Maulana View a PDF of the paper titled Impact of Circuit Depth versus Qubit Count on Variational Quantum Classifiers for Higgs Boson Signal Detection, by Fatih Maulana View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:High-Energy Physics (HEP) experiments, such as those at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), generate massive datasets that challenge classical computational limits.

Quantum Machine Learning (QML) offers a potential advantage in processing high-dimensional data; however, finding the optimal architecture for current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices remains an open challenge. This study investigates the performance of Variational Quantum Classifiers (VQC) in detecting Higgs Boson signals using the ATLAS Higgs Boson Machine Learning Challenge 2014 experiment dataset. We implemented a dimensionality reduction pipeline using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to map 30 physical features into 4-qubit and 8-qubit latent spaces. We benchmarked three configurations: (A) a shallow 4-qubit circuit, (B) a deep 4-qubit circuit with increased entanglement layers, and (C) an expanded 8-qubit circuit. Experimental results demonstrate that increasing circuit depth significantly improves performance, yielding the highest accuracy of 56.2% (Configuration B), compared to a baseline of 51.9%. Conversely, simply scaling to 8 qubits resulted in a performance degradation to 50.6% due to optimization challenges associated with Barren Plateaus in the larger Hilbert space. These findings suggest that for near-term quantum hardware, prioritizing circuit depth and entanglement capability is more critical than increasing qubit count for effective anomaly detection in HEP data. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Machine Learning (cs.LG); High Energy Physics - Experiment (hep-ex) Cite as: arXiv:2601.11937 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2601.11937v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.11937 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18096724 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources Submission history From: Fatih Maulana [view email] [v1] Sat, 17 Jan 2026 07:02:06 UTC (459 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Impact of Circuit Depth versus Qubit Count on Variational Quantum Classifiers for Higgs Boson Signal Detection, by Fatih MaulanaView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-01 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG hep-ex References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

energy-climate
quantum-hardware
quantum-investment
quantum-machine-learning

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics