Back to News
quantum-computing

Gravitational Entanglement in Optomechanics: Distinguishing Classical and Quantum Models

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers from the University of Vienna and IQOQI Vienna challenge assumptions about gravitational entanglement as proof of quantum gravity, arguing current optomechanical experiments may not distinguish quantum effects from classical mimics. The study reveals that standard optomechanical setups using Gaussian states and second-order gravitational potentials can replicate "quantum" entanglement signatures classically via Wigner-Weyl formalism, undermining prior interpretations. Authors propose two operational witnesses—Wigner negativity for detecting non-classicality and Weyl operator negativity for identifying non-quantumness—to rigorously separate quantum and classical gravitational effects in experiments. Experimental requirements for certifying true gravitational entanglement are shown to be far stricter than previously believed, demanding non-Gaussian states and higher-order gravitational interactions beyond current protocols. This work reframes the debate on quantum gravity’s experimental verification, urging more sophisticated tests to avoid false positives from classical gravity models in optomechanical systems.
Gravitational Entanglement in Optomechanics: Distinguishing Classical and Quantum Models

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2605.20330 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 19 May 2026] Title:Gravitational Entanglement in Optomechanics: Distinguishing Classical and Quantum Models Authors:Samuel Schlegel, Ankit Kumar, Tomasz Paterek, Borivoje Dakić View a PDF of the paper titled Gravitational Entanglement in Optomechanics: Distinguishing Classical and Quantum Models, by Samuel Schlegel and 3 other authors View PDF Abstract:Observation of gravitationally induced quantum entanglement is often interpreted as a direct evidence of non-classical gravity. While the form and the degree of non-classicality have been rigorously studied from a foundational perspective, classical models reproducing experimental signatures of such entanglement remain underexplored. Motivated by the experimental simplicity, nearly all existing optomechanical approaches assume Gaussian initial states, and due to the weakness of gravity the quantum Newtonian potential is truncated at the second order. However, this regime admits a classical description in terms of the Wigner-Weyl representation, including features typically associated with quantum entanglement. A clear distinction between classical and quantum predictions emerges only beyond this setting. We comprehensively analyze the possibilities and provide operational witnesses for detection of non-classicality via Wigner negativity, and detection of non-quantumness via negativity of the Weyl operator. Our results demonstrate that the experimental requirements on certifying gravitational entanglement are more stringent than previously anticipated. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2605.20330 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2605.20330v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20330 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Samuel Schlegel [view email] [v1] Tue, 19 May 2026 18:00:02 UTC (206 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Gravitational Entanglement in Optomechanics: Distinguishing Classical and Quantum Models, by Samuel Schlegel and 3 other authorsView PDFTeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-05 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics