Back to News
quantum-computing

From compatibility of measurements to exploring Quantum Darwinism on NISQ

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers Doucet and Deffner demonstrate how Quantum Darwinism—a theory explaining classical reality’s emergence from quantum systems—can be experimentally tested on NISQ devices, bridging theory and hardware limitations. The study links Quantum Darwinism’s breakdown to non-classical measurement statistics, showing that deviations from classical behavior reveal quantum signatures in noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) processors. A key finding ties Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability distributions to Quantum Darwinism, where classical-like behavior emerges only when the system obeys Darwinism’s rules, offering a measurable threshold for quantum-classical transition. Experiments on IonQ’s trapped-ion and IBM’s superconducting quantum platforms validate the approach, using these deviations as benchmarks for assessing genuine quantum characteristics in current hardware. This work provides a practical framework for identifying and quantifying quantum advantages in NISQ devices, advancing both fundamental physics and near-term quantum computing applications.
From compatibility of measurements to exploring Quantum Darwinism on NISQ

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2601.05350 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 8 Jan 2026] Title:From compatibility of measurements to exploring Quantum Darwinism on NISQ Authors:Emery Doucet, Sebastian Deffner View a PDF of the paper titled From compatibility of measurements to exploring Quantum Darwinism on NISQ, by Emery Doucet and 1 other authors View PDF Abstract:Quantum Darwinism explains how tenets of classical reality, such as objectivity and repeatability, emerge within a quantum universe. As a mathematical framework, Quantum Darwinism also provides guiding principles that determine what physical models support emergent classical behavior, what specific observables obey classical laws, and much more. For instance, in a recent work we elucidated that the limit under which Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability distributions become effectively classical coincides with the regime where the underlying physical model obeys the rules of Quantum Darwinism. In the present work, we study the breaking of Quantum Darwinism in a specific model and how that translates to non-classical measurement statistics. Interestingly, this provides effective tools for benchmarking the genuine quantum characteristics of NISQ hardware, which we demonstrate with IonQ's trapped-ion and IBM's superconducting quantum computing platforms. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2601.05350 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2601.05350v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.05350 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Emery Doucet [view email] [v1] Thu, 8 Jan 2026 20:04:38 UTC (2,853 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled From compatibility of measurements to exploring Quantum Darwinism on NISQ, by Emery Doucet and 1 other authorsView PDFTeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-01 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

ionq
quantum-computing
superconducting-qubits

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics