Back to News
quantum-computing

Extending quantum theory with AI-assisted deterministic game theory

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers propose an AI-driven framework to predict individual quantum experiment outcomes, challenging standard quantum theory by modeling experiments as deterministic games between observers and the universe. The team bypasses quantum impossibility theorems by replacing "free choice" with "contingent free choice," a weaker assumption allowing hidden variables to influence measurements without violating locality. Neural networks learn hidden reward functions in quantum experiments, using Kullback-Leibler divergence to align deterministic game outcomes with quantum predictions, tested successfully on the EPR 2-2-2 scenario. This "non-Nashian" approach abandons unilateral deviation assumptions, instead assuming perfect prediction, framing quantum behavior as an economic optimization problem where the universe minimizes action. The work offers a proof-of-concept for local-realist hidden-variable models, suggesting AI-assisted game theory could help unify quantum mechanics with deterministic underlying principles.
Extending quantum theory with AI-assisted deterministic game theory

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2602.17213 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 19 Feb 2026] Title:Extending quantum theory with AI-assisted deterministic game theory Authors:Florian Pauschitz, Ben Moseley, Ghislain Fourny View a PDF of the paper titled Extending quantum theory with AI-assisted deterministic game theory, by Florian Pauschitz and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We present an AI-assisted framework for predicting individual runs of complex quantum experiments, including contextuality and causality (adaptive measurements), within our long-term programme of discovering a local hidden-variable theory that extends quantum theory. In order to circumvent impossibility theorems, we replace the assumption of free choice (measurement independence and parameter independence) with a weaker, compatibilistic version called contingent free choice. Our framework is based on interpreting complex quantum experiments as a Chess-like game between observers and the universe, which is seen as an economic agent minimizing action. The game structures corresponding to generic experiments such as fixed-causal-order process matrices or causal contextuality scenarios, together with a deterministic non-Nashian resolution algorithm that abandons unilateral deviation assumptions (free choice) and assumes Perfect Prediction instead, were described in previous work. In this new research, we learn the reward functions of the game, which contain a hidden variable, using neural networks. The cost function is the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the frequency histograms obtained through many deterministic runs of the game and the predictions of the extended Born rule. Using our framework on the specific case of the EPR 2-2-2 experiment acts as a proof-of-concept and a toy local-realist hidden-variable model that non-Nashian quantum theory is a promising avenue towards a local hidden-variable theory. Our framework constitutes a solid foundation, which can be further expanded in order to fully discover a complete quantum theory. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT) MSC classes: 91A35 ACM classes: J.4 Cite as: arXiv:2602.17213 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2602.17213v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.17213 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Ghislain Fourny [view email] [v1] Thu, 19 Feb 2026 10:04:07 UTC (500 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Extending quantum theory with AI-assisted deterministic game theory, by Florian Pauschitz and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-02 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.GT References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics