Back to News
quantum-computing

Entanglement Barriers from Computational Complexity: Matrix-Product-State Approach to Satisfiability

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers demonstrated that quantum-inspired classical algorithms using matrix product states (MPS) and imaginary time propagation (ITP) hit fundamental entanglement barriers when solving 3-SAT, mirroring the problem’s NP-complete hardness. The study reveals these entanglement barriers originate from classical computational complexity, specifically linking the hardness of #3-SAT (a #P-complete counting problem) to quantum state entanglement properties in MPS. Stochastic models show how the structure of 3-SAT instances directly imprints onto MPS, exposing how classical intractability manifests as quantum entanglement growth during imaginary time evolution. The protocol’s resource demands are prohibitive: non-Clifford operations scale superlinearly with system size, creating a "non-stabilizerness" barrier for both classical MPS simulations and gate-based quantum computers. These findings underscore intrinsic limitations of quantum-inspired classical methods for NP-hard problems, clarifying why even hybrid approaches face exponential resource requirements.
Entanglement Barriers from Computational Complexity: Matrix-Product-State Approach to Satisfiability

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2602.20299 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 23 Feb 2026] Title:Entanglement Barriers from Computational Complexity: Matrix-Product-State Approach to Satisfiability Authors:Tim Pokart, Frank Pollmann, Jan Carl Budich View a PDF of the paper titled Entanglement Barriers from Computational Complexity: Matrix-Product-State Approach to Satisfiability, by Tim Pokart and Frank Pollmann and Jan Carl Budich View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We approach the 3-SAT satisfiability problem with the quantum-inspired method of imaginary time propagation (ITP) applied to matrix product states (MPS) on a classical computer. This ansatz is fundamentally limited by a quantum entanglement barrier that emerges in imaginary time, reflecting the exponential hardness expected for this NP-complete problem. Strikingly, we argue based on careful analysis of the structure imprinted onto the MPS by the 3-SAT instances that this barrier arises from classical computational complexity. To reveal this connection, we elucidate with stochastic models the specific relationship between the classical hardness of the $\sharp$P $\supseteq$ NP-complete counting problem $\sharp$3-SAT and the entanglement properties of the quantum state. Our findings illuminate the limitations of this quantum-inspired approach and demonstrate how purely classical computational complexity can manifest in quantum entanglement. Furthermore, we present estimates of the non-stabilizerness required by the protocol, finding a similar resource barrier. Specifically, the necessary amount of non-Clifford operations scales superlinearly in system size, thus implying extensive resource requirements of ITP on different architectures such as Clifford circuits or gate-based quantum computers. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech); Strongly Correlated Electrons (cond-mat.str-el); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2602.20299 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2602.20299v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.20299 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Tim Pokart [view email] [v1] Mon, 23 Feb 2026 19:29:04 UTC (1,135 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Entanglement Barriers from Computational Complexity: Matrix-Product-State Approach to Satisfiability, by Tim Pokart and Frank Pollmann and Jan Carl BudichView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-02 Change to browse by: cond-mat cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.str-el physics physics.comp-ph References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-computing
partnership

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics