Back to News
quantum-computing

Encoding Matters: Benchmarking Binary and D-ary Representations for Quantum Combinatorial Optimization

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers from the University of Melbourne and collaborators introduced Quadratic Unconstrained D-ary Optimization (QUDO) as a superior alternative to binary QUBO for quantum combinatorial optimization, published February 2026. The study demonstrates QUDO’s ability to natively encode structural constraints—eliminating penalty terms—across problems like Traveling Salesman, Vehicle Routing, and Max-K-Cut, reducing Hamiltonian complexity on near-term quantum devices. Benchmarking against binary QUBO using qudit-based Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), QUDO achieved higher approximation ratios with lower computational overhead at equivalent circuit depths. Experiments confirmed QUDO’s scalability advantages by directly mapping decision variables to higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces, avoiding auxiliary variables that inflate problem size in binary encodings. Results suggest QUDO could accelerate practical quantum optimization by improving solution quality while minimizing resource demands, addressing a key bottleneck in current quantum algorithms.
Encoding Matters: Benchmarking Binary and D-ary Representations for Quantum Combinatorial Optimization

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2602.07357 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 7 Feb 2026] Title:Encoding Matters: Benchmarking Binary and D-ary Representations for Quantum Combinatorial Optimization Authors:Shashank Sanjay Bhat, Peiyong Wang, Joseph West, Udaya Parampalli View a PDF of the paper titled Encoding Matters: Benchmarking Binary and D-ary Representations for Quantum Combinatorial Optimization, by Shashank Sanjay Bhat and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Combinatorial optimization problems are typically formulated using Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO), where constraints are enforced through penalty terms that introduce auxiliary variables and rapidly increase Hamiltonian complexity, limiting scalability on near term quantum devices. In this work, we systematically study Quadratic Unconstrained D-ary Optimization (QUDO) as an alternative formulation in which decision variables are encoded directly in higher dimensional Hilbert spaces. We demonstrate that QUDO naturally captures structural constraints across a range of problem classes, including the Traveling Salesman Problem, two variants of the Vehicle Routing Problem, graph coloring, job scheduling, and Max-K-Cut, without the need for extensive penalty constructions. Using a qudit-level implementation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (qudit QAOA), we benchmark these formulations against their binary QUBO counterparts and exact classical solutions. Our study show consistently improved approximation ratios and substantially reduced computational overhead at comparable circuit depths, highlighting QUDO as a scalable and expressive representation for quantum combinatorial optimization. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2602.07357 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2602.07357v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.07357 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Shashank Bhat [view email] [v1] Sat, 7 Feb 2026 04:37:32 UTC (42 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Encoding Matters: Benchmarking Binary and D-ary Representations for Quantum Combinatorial Optimization, by Shashank Sanjay Bhat and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-02 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-optimization
quantum-investment
quantum-algorithms

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics