Driving Floquet physics with excitonic fields

Summarize this article with:
Nature Physics (2026)Cite this article Floquet engineering, in which an intense optical field modifies the electronic structure of a material, offers a route to the control of quantum and topological properties. However, it is challenging to realize this in experiments due to relatively weak light–matter coupling and the dominance of detrimental effects, such as multi-photon absorption and sample heating. Here we use time- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy to show that in a monolayer semiconductor, Floquet effects caused by an excitonic field—the time-periodic oscillations of the self-energy of an electron bound to a hole—are two orders of magnitude stronger and persist longer than optically driven counterparts. Our measurements directly capture the hybridization between the exciton-dressed conduction band and the valence band in two-dimensional semiconductors, in agreement with first-principles calculations. The onset of this hybridization with increasing exciton density also correlates with the Bose–Einstein condensation to Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer crossover, extensively discussed in theory for non-equilibrium excitonic insulators. These results establish exciton-driven Floquet engineering as a means for studying correlated electronic phases.This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel any timeSubscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $259.00 per yearonly $21.58 per issueBuy this articleUSD 39.95Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkoutThe data that supports the findings of this work are available upon request to the corresponding authors.Lloyd-Hughes, J. et al. The 2021 ultrafast spectroscopic probes of condensed matter roadmap. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 353001 (2021). Google Scholar de la Torre, A. et al. Colloquium: nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041002 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Giustino, F. et al. The 2021 quantum materials roadmap. J. Phys.: Mater. 3, 042006 (2020).
Google Scholar Basov, D. N., Averitt, R. D. & Hsieh, D. Towards properties on demand in quantum materials. Nat. Mater. 16, 1077–1088 (2017).Article ADS Google Scholar Oka, T. & Aoki, H. Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 79, 081406 (2009).Article ADS Google Scholar Lindner, N. H., Refael, G. & Galitski, V. Floquet topological insulator in semiconductor quantum wells. Nat. Phys. 7, 490–495 (2011).Article Google Scholar Sentef, M. A. et al. Theory of Floquet band formation and local pseudospin textures in pump-probe photoemission of graphene. Nat. Commun. 6, 7047 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar Hübener, H., Sentef, M. A., De Giovannini, U., Kemper, A. F. & Rubio, A. Creating stable Floquet-Weyl semimetals by laser-driving of 3D Dirac materials. Nat. Commun. 8, 13940 (2017).Article ADS Google Scholar Claassen, M., Jia, C., Moritz, B. & Devereaux, T. P. All-optical materials design of chiral edge modes in transition-metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Commun. 7, 13074 (2016).Article ADS Google Scholar Wang, Y. H., Steinberg, H., Jarillo-Herrero, P. & Gedik, N. Observation of Floquet-Bloch states on the surface of a topological insulator. Science 342, 453–457 (2013).Article ADS Google Scholar Mahmood, F. et al. Selective scattering between Floquet–Bloch and Volkov states in a topological insulator. Nat. Phys. 12, 306–310 (2016).Article Google Scholar McIver, J. W. et al. Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene. Nat. Phys. 16, 38–41 (2020).Article Google Scholar Aeschlimann, S. et al. Survival of Floquet-Bloch states in the presence of scattering. Nano Lett. 21, 5028–5035 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Shan, J.-Y. et al. Giant modulation of optical nonlinearity by Floquet engineering. Nature 600, 235–239 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Park, S. et al. Steady Floquet-Andreev states in graphene Josephson junctions. Nature 603, 421–426 (2022).Article ADS Google Scholar Kobayashi, Y. et al. Floquet engineering of strongly driven excitons in monolayer tungsten disulfide. Nat. Phys. 19, 171–176 (2023).Uchida, K., Kusaba, S., Nagai, K., Ikeda, T. N. & Tanaka, K. Diabatic and adiabatic transitions between Floquet states imprinted in coherent exciton emission in monolayer WSe2. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq7281 (2022).Article ADS Google Scholar Zhou, S. et al. Pseudospin-selective Floquet band engineering in black phosphorus. Nature 614, 75–80 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Bao, C., Tang, P., Sun, D. & Zhou, S. Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D materials and topological materials. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 33–48 (2021).Article Google Scholar Keunecke, M. et al. Electromagnetic dressing of the electron energy spectrum of Au(111) at high momenta. Phys. Rev. B 102, 161403 (2020).Article ADS Google Scholar Hübener, H., De Giovannini, U. & Rubio, A. Phonon driven Floquet matter. Nano Lett. 18, 1535–1542 (2018).Article ADS Google Scholar Zhang, R.-X. & Das Sarma, S. Anomalous Floquet chiral topological superconductivity in a topological insulator sandwich structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 067001 (2021).Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Chan, Y.-H., Qiu, D. Y., da Jornada, F. H. & Louie, S. G. Giant self-driven exciton-Floquet signatures in time-resolved photoemission spectroscopy of MoS2 from time-dependent GW approach. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2301957120 (2023).Article Google Scholar Perfetto, E. & Stefanucci, G. Floquet topological phase of nondriven p-wave nonequilibrium excitonic insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 106401 (2020).Article ADS Google Scholar Liu, R.-Y. et al. Femtosecond to picosecond transient effects in WSe2 observed by pump-probe angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 7, 15981 (2017).Article ADS Google Scholar Perfetto, E., Sangalli, D., Marini, A. & Stefanucci, G. Pump driven normal-to-excitonic insulator transition: Josephson oscillations and signatures of BEC-BCS crossover in time-resolved ARPES. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 124601 (2019).Article Google Scholar Ito, S. et al. Build-up and dephasing of Floquet-Bloch bands on subcycle timescales. Nature 616, 696–701 (2023).Article ADS Google Scholar Kohn, W. Excitonic phases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 439–442 (1967).Article ADS Google Scholar Jérome, D., Rice, T. M. & Kohn, W. Excitonic insulator. Phys. Rev. 158, 462–475 (1967).Article ADS Google Scholar Parmenter, R. H. & Henson, W. R. Superconductive properties of the excitonic insulator. Phys. Rev. 2, 140–147 (1970).Article ADS Google Scholar Ma, L. et al. Strongly correlated excitonic insulator in atomic double layers. Nature 598, 585–589 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Jia, Y. et al. Evidence for a monolayer excitonic insulator. Nat. Phys. 18, 87–93 (2022).Article Google Scholar Kogar, A. et al. Signatures of exciton condensation in a transition metal dichalcogenide. Science 358, 1314–1317 (2017).Article ADS Google Scholar Gu, J. et al. Dipolar excitonic insulator in a moiré lattice. Nat. Phys. 18, 395–400 (2022).Article Google Scholar Chernikov, A. et al. Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic Rydberg series in monolayer WS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076802 (2014).Article ADS Google Scholar Bussolotti, F., Yang, J., Kawai, H., Chee, J. Y. & Goh, K. E. J. Influence of many-body effects on hole quasiparticle dynamics in a WS2 monolayer. Phys. Rev. B 103, 045412 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Madéo, J. et al. Directly visualizing the momentum-forbidden dark excitons and their dynamics in atomically thin semiconductors. Science 370, 1199–1204 (2020).Article ADS Google Scholar Man, M. K. L. et al. Experimental measurement of the intrinsic excitonic wave function. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg0192 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Karni, O. et al. Structure of the moiré exciton captured by imaging its electron and hole. Nature 603, 247–252 (2022).Article ADS Google Scholar Schönhense, G., Medjanik, K. & Elmers, H.-J. Space-, time- and spin-resolved photoemission. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 200, 94–118 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar Medjanik, K. et al. Direct 3D mapping of the Fermi surface and Fermi velocity. Nat. Mater. 16, 615–621 (2017).Article ADS Google Scholar Ulstrup, S. et al. Ultrafast band structure control of a two-dimensional heterostructure. ACS Nano 10, 6315–6322 (2016).Article Google Scholar Grubišić Čabo, A. et al. Observation of ultrafast free carrier dynamics in single layer MoS2. Nano Lett. 15, 5883–5887 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar Liu, F., Ziffer, M. E., Hansen, K. R., Wang, J. & Zhu, X. Direct determination of band-gap renormalization in the photoexcited monolayer MoS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 246803 (2019).Article ADS Google Scholar Liu, F., Li, Q. & Zhu, X.-Y. Direct determination of momentum-resolved electron transfer in the photoexcited van der Waals heterobilayer WS2/MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 101, 201405 (2020).Article ADS Google Scholar Lin, Y. et al. Exciton-driven renormalization of quasiparticle band structure in monolayer MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 106, L081117 (2022).Article ADS Google Scholar Wallauer, R. et al. Momentum-resolved observation of exciton formation dynamics in monolayer WS2. Nano Lett. 21, 5867–5873 (2021).Article ADS Google Scholar Dong, S. et al. Direct measurement of key exciton properties: energy, dynamics, and spatial distribution of the wave function. Nat. Sci. 1, e10010 (2021).Article Google Scholar Schmitt, D. et al. Formation of moiré interlayer excitons in space and time. Nature 608, 499–503 (2022).Article ADS Google Scholar Karni, O., Esin, I. & Dani, K. M. Through the lens of a momentum microscope: viewing light-induced quantum phenomena in 2D materials. Adv. Mater. 35, e2204120 (2022).Article Google Scholar Jakubczyk, T. et al. Impact of environment on dynamics of exciton complexes in a WS2 monolayer. 2D Mater. 5, 031007 (2018).Article Google Scholar Rustagi, A. & Kemper, A. F. Photoemission signature of excitons. Phys. Rev. B 97, 235310 (2018).Article ADS Google Scholar Kwong, N. H., Rupper, G. & Binder, R. Self-consistent T-matrix theory of semiconductor light-absorption and luminescence. Phys. Rev. B 79, 155205 (2009).Article ADS Google Scholar Yoshioka, T. & Asano, K. Classical-quantum crossovers in quasi-one-dimensional electron-hole systems: exciton-Mott physics and interband optical spectra. Phys. Rev. B 86, 115314 (2012).Article ADS Google Scholar Perfetto, E., Sangalli, D., Marini, A. & Stefanucci, G. First-principles approach to excitons in time-resolved and angle-resolved photoemission spectra. Phys. Rev. B 94, 245303 (2016).Article ADS Google Scholar Steinhoff, A. et al. Exciton fission in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors. Nat. Commun. 8, 1166 (2017).Article ADS Google Scholar Attaccalite, C., Grüning, M. & Marini, A. Real-time approach to the optical properties of solids and nanostructures: time-dependent Bethe-Salpeter equation. Phys. Rev. B 84, 245110 (2011).Article ADS Google Scholar Chan, Y.-H., Qiu, D. Y., da Jornada, F. H. & Louie, S. G. Giant exciton-enhanced shift currents and direct current conduction with subbandgap photo excitations produced by many-electron interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e1906938118 (2021).Article Google Scholar Zhao, W. et al. Evolution of electronic structure in atomically thin sheets of WS2 and WSe2. ACS Nano 7, 791–797 (2013).Article Google Scholar Ruppert, C., Chernikov, A., Hill, H. M., Rigosi, A. F. & Heinz, T. F. The role of electronic and phononic excitation in the optical response of monolayer WS2 after ultrafast excitation. Nano Lett. 17, 644–651 (2017).Article ADS Google Scholar Morita, Y., Yoshioka, K. & Kuwata-Gonokami, M. Observation of Bose-Einstein condensates of excitons in a bulk semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 13, 5388 (2022).Article ADS Google Scholar Sun, B. et al. Evidence for equilibrium exciton condensation in monolayer WTe2. Nat. Phys. 18, 94–99 (2022).Article ADS Google Scholar Wang, Z. et al. Evidence of high-temperature exciton condensation in two-dimensional atomic double layers. Nature 574, 76–80 (2019).Article ADS Google Scholar Murotani, Y. et al. Light-driven electron-hole Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer-like state in bulk GaAs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 197401 (2019).Article ADS Google Scholar Perfetto, E., Bianchi, S. & Stefanucci, G. Time-resolved ARPES spectra of nonequilibrium excitonic insulators: revealing macroscopic coherence with ultrashort pulses. Phys. Rev. B 101, 041201 (2020).Article ADS Google Scholar Glutsch, S. & Zimmermann, R. Coherent optics for pumping near the absorption edge. Phys. Rev. B 45, 5857–5862 (1992).Article ADS Google Scholar Chu, H. & Chang, Y. C. Theory of optical spectra of exciton condensates. Phys. Rev. B 54, 5020–5028 (1996).Article ADS Google Scholar Östreich, T. & Schönhammer, K. Non-stationary excitonic-insulator states in photoexcited semiconductors. Z. Phys. B 91, 189–197 (1993).Article ADS Google Scholar Liu, D. E., Levchenko, A. & Baranger, H. U. Floquet Majorana fermions for topological qubits in superconducting devices and cold-atom systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 047002 (2013).Article ADS Google Scholar Giovannini, U. D. & Hübener, H. Floquet analysis of excitations in materials. J. Phys.: Mater. 3, 012001 (2020).
Google Scholar Sie, E. J. et al. Valley-selective optical Stark effect in monolayer WS2. Nat. Mater. 14, 290–294 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar McCreary, K. M., Hanbicki, A. T., Jernigan, G. G., Culbertson, J. C. & Jonker, B. T. Synthesis of large-area WS2 monolayers with exceptional photoluminescence. Sci. Rep. 6, 19159 (2016).Article ADS Google Scholar Medina Silva, H. & Goh, K. E. J. A blade structure to direct precursor gases for the growth of uniform large area TMDCS. Patent no. WO/2022/186776, Singapore (2022).Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
Google Scholar Hamann, D. R. Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013).Article ADS Google Scholar Hybertsen, M. S. & Louie, S. G. Electron correlation in semiconductors and insulators: band gaps and quasiparticle energies. Phys. Rev. B 34, 5390–5413 (1986).Article ADS Google Scholar Rohlfing, M. & Louie, S. G. Electron-hole excitations and optical spectra from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 62, 4927–4944 (2000).Article ADS Google Scholar Deslippe, J. et al. BerkeleyGW: a massively parallel computer package for the calculation of the quasiparticle and optical properties of materials and nanostructures. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1269–1289 (2012).Article ADS Google Scholar da Jornada, F. H., Qiu, D. Y. & Louie, S. G. Nonuniform sampling schemes of the Brillouin zone for many-electron perturbation-theory calculations in reduced dimensionality. Phys. Rev. B 95, 035109 (2017).Article ADS Google Scholar Rocca, D., Lu, D. & Galli, G. Ab initio calculations of optical absorption spectra: solution of the Bethe-Salpeter equation within density matrix perturbation theory. J. Chem. Phys. 133, 164109 (2010).Article ADS Google Scholar Rabani, E., Baer, R. & Neuhauser, D. Time-dependent stochastic Bethe-Salpeter approach. Phys. Rev. B 91, 235302 (2015).Article ADS Google Scholar Stefanucci, G. & van Leeuwen, R. Nonequilibrium Many-Body Theory of Quantum Systems: A Modern Introduction (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2025).Download referencesWe thank the engineering support section of Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) Graduate University and thank Y. Yamauchi from the OIST Facilities Operations and Use section for their support. V.P. and K.M.D. thank O. Karni for discussions. V.P., D.R.B., X.Z., N.S.C., J.P.U., M.K.L.M., J.M. and K.M.D. acknowledge that this work was supported by the Femtosecond Spectroscopy Unit of OIST. M.K.L.M. acknowledges support from the JSPS (KAKENHI Grant No. 17K04995). J.M. acknowledges support from the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number 24K00561). K.M.D. acknowledges support from the JST FOREST (Grant number 23718777) and the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant numbers 22K18270, 24H00191 and 23K25807). F.H.d.J. acknowledges support from the Center for Non-Perturbative Studies of Functional Materials Under Non-Equilibrium Conditions, funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science (Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344). This work uses codes developed by the Center for Computational Study of Excited State Phenomena in Energy Materials, which is funded by the DOE Office of Science (Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231). We acknowledge support for computational resources and storage provided by the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility (Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231) and the National Center for High-performance Computing. D.Y.Q. acknowledges support from the US DoE, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (Early Career Award No. DE-SC0021965). F.B. and K.E.J.G. acknowledge funding support from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (Grant No. 21709) and the Singapore National Research Foundation (Grant No. CRP21-2018-0001). K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Numbers 21H05233 and 23H02052), the CREST (JPMJCR24A5), JST and World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan. G.S. and E.P. acknowledge funding support from Ministero Università e Ricerca PRIN (Grant Agreement No. 2022WZ8LME), INFN (Project TIME2QUEST) and the European Research Council MSCA-ITN TIMES (Grant Agreement No. 101118915). M.G.M. acknowledges the support from the Brazilian funding agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Institutos Nacionais de Ciência e Tecnologia (INCTs) em Nanomateriais de Carbono e Materiais 2D e Materials Informatics.These authors contributed equally: Vivek Pareek, David R. Bacon, Xing Zhu.Femtosecond Spectroscopy Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, JapanVivek Pareek, David R. Bacon, Xing Zhu, Nicholas S. Chan, Joel Pérez Urquizo, Michael K. L. Man, Julien Madéo & Keshav M. DaniDepartment of Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USAVivek PareekInstitute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Academia Sinica, and Physics Division, National Center of Theoretical Sciences, Taipei, TaiwanYang-Hao ChanInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, SingaporeFabio Bussolotti & Kuan Eng Johnson GohInstituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilMarcos G. MenezesResearch Center for Functional Materials, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, JapanKenji WatanabeInternational Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, JapanTakashi TaniguchiPhysics Department, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, ItalyEnrico Perfetto & Gianluca StefanucciINFN, Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, ItalyEnrico Perfetto & Gianluca StefanucciDepartment of Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USADiana Y. QiuDepartment of Physics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SingaporeKuan Eng Johnson GohDivision of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, SingaporeKuan Eng Johnson GohDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USAFelipe H. da JornadaStanford PULSE Institute, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USAFelipe H. da JornadaSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarSearch author on:PubMed Google ScholarV.P., D.R.B. and X.Z. performed the TR-ARPES measurements, the sample characterization and analysis of the data, with assistance from J.P.U., M.K.L.M. and J.M. and under the supervision of K.M.D. Y.-H.C. implemented the theoretical simulations, with assistance from D.Y.Q. and under the supervision of F.H.d.J. M.G.M. contributed to the exciton-Floquet physics, under the supervision of F.H.d.J. E.P. and G.S. contributed to the understanding of the physics of excitons at high densities. K.E.J.G. developed the chemical vapour deposition growth process for large 1L WS2 samples. F.B. prepared the samples with assistance from N.S.C. and V.P. and under the supervision of K.E.J.G. and K.M.D. K.W. and T.T. provided the bulk hBN crystals for the study. F.H.d.J. and K.M.D. conceived and designed the study. All authors contributed to the writing and reviewing of the paper.Correspondence to Felipe H. da Jornada or Keshav M. Dani.J.M., M.K.L.M. and K.M.D. are inventors on a granted patent related to this work BS filed by the OIST School Corporation (US patent 11,372,199). K.E.J.G. is an inventor on a patent application related to this work filed by the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (Singapore) (Patent SG2022050106 published on 9 September 2022). The other authors declare no competing interests.Nature Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.We measured the absorption and the photoemission excitation (PEE) spectra at 100 K from the 1 L WS2 sample. The PEE spectrum was obtained by integrating the photoemission signal from the electron part of the excitons at zero pump-probe time delay. The black arrow indicates the energy of the pump pulse used to access optically driven Floquet physics. The red arrow indicates the pump energy used for the exciton driven Floquet process. We measure the linewidth of our sample to be 8 meV by fitting a gaussian function (solid blue line) to the absorption spectra at 100 K.a) A 3D dataset showing the 6 K points of the 1 L WS2 sample obtained from ToF MM. The red hexagon marks the first BZ with the red dashed line showing the cut along the Γ-K-M used to obtain the band structures in Fig. 1d,e. b) The E-K cuts like the cuts shown in Fig. 1d,e. The dotted line shows EDCs obtained around the K point for (c). The inset shows the schematic diagram for the cuts. c) The valence band EDC at the K point with the calculated Shirley background, d) Valence band EDC after subtraction is fitted to a double gaussian function to get the peak position for both VB1 and VB2 to calculate the exciton-driven hybridization effect.a-d) Dispersion of the valence band replica with decreasing exciton densities obtained by single gaussian fitting. e) Dispersion of VB1 and VB2 for no pump case for comparison (f-i) Dispersion of VB1 and VB2 with decreasing exciton densities obtained by fitting a double gaussian function to the Shirley-corrected EDCs.Energy distribution curves (EDCs) for the exciton replica at selected k positions around the K point (0,0) for a) low exciton density and b) high exciton density. The red solid lines are single gaussian fitting to the EDCs. The center position of the gaussian fitting is marked by the grey triangles. c) Comparison between the dispersion of the exciton replica at low (grey circles) and high (orange circles) with the ground state valence band (dashed line). The valence band dispersion was shifted up in energy by 2.1 eV for comparison. For the low exciton density, we clearly observe a parabolic negative dispersion mimicking the valence band. For the high exciton density case, the replica dispersion shows the distinct Mexican-hat-like dispersion.a) Difference in the dispersion for VB1 for different exciton densities with respect to the no pump VB1 dispersion showing drastic changes near the K point, b) Difference in the dispersion for VB2 with respect to the no pump VB2 dispersion showing no substantial change in general.a) Unperturbed bandstructure at the K valley. b) Bandstructure after above bandgap (ℏν = 3 eV) excitation. We observe the characteristic positive dispersion from the free carriers occupying the conduction band but do not observe the Mexican-hat-like dispersion in the bandstructure for this case. c) Bandstructure after A exciton resonant (ℏν = 2.1 eV) excitation. We observe the hallmark Mexican-hat-like dispersion due to the excitonic field. Both the experiments were performed at 100 K with ~2×1012cm −2 excited photocarriers in b) and ~2×1012cm −2 excitons in c). d) The strength of the hybridization (ΔEX) extracted for different pump wavelengths around the exciton resonance (yellow circles) matches the A exciton absorption peak (blue) confirming the correlation between the excitons and the Mexican-hat-like dispersion. The pump power was kept constant (10 mW) for all the wavelengths. The black curve is a guide to the eye.a) Energy integrated momentum image of the top of the K valley (VB1) with an exciton density nX = 3 × 1012 cm−2. The red boxes indicate the region used to normalize the intensity for the un-photoexcited and photoexcited case. b) Energy integrated momentum image of the top of the K valley for the un-photoexcited case. c) The momentum distribution of the hole wavefunction obtained after taking the ratio of photoexcited and un-photoexcited bands in (a) and (b) respectively.Supplementary Figs. 1–6 and Discussion.Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.Reprints and permissionsPareek, V., Bacon, D.R., Zhu, X. et al. Driving Floquet physics with excitonic fields. Nat. Phys. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-03132-zDownload citationReceived: 23 May 2025Accepted: 11 November 2025Published: 19 January 2026Version of record: 19 January 2026DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-03132-zAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
