Back to News
quantum-computing

Distance-Finding Algorithms for Quantum Codes and Circuits

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers Mark Webster, Abraham Jacob, and Oscar Higgott introduced a benchmark study comparing distance-finding algorithms for quantum error-correcting codes and circuits, published in March 2026. The study highlights the challenge of calculating distances for quantum LDPC codes—critical for fault-tolerant quantum computing—due to their complexity compared to classical codes. Exact methods like Brouwer-Zimmermann and mixed integer programming were tested alongside heuristic approaches, including syndrome decoders and Stim’s undetectable error techniques, balancing accuracy and computational efficiency. The team enhanced the QDistEvol algorithm, demonstrating superior performance for LDPC codes, offering a scalable solution for large-scale quantum error correction. All algorithms and test data are open-source via the codeDistance Python package, enabling broader community adoption and further research.
Distance-Finding Algorithms for Quantum Codes and Circuits

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2603.22532 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 23 Mar 2026] Title:Distance-Finding Algorithms for Quantum Codes and Circuits Authors:Mark Webster, Abraham Jacob, Oscar Higgott View a PDF of the paper titled Distance-Finding Algorithms for Quantum Codes and Circuits, by Mark Webster and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The distance of a classical or quantum code is a key figure of merit which reflects its capacity to detect errors. Quantum LDPC code families have considerable promise in reducing the overhead required for fault-tolerant quantum computation, but calculating their distance is challenging with existing methods. We generally assess the performance of a quantum code under circuit level error models, and for such scenarios the circuit distance is an important consideration. Calculating circuit distance is in general more difficult than finding the distance of the corresponding code as the detector error matrix of the circuit is usually much larger than the code's check matrix. In this work, we benchmark a wide range of distance-finding methods for various classical and quantum code families, as well as syndrome-extraction circuits. We consider both exact methods (such as Brouwer-Zimmermann, connected cluster, SAT and mixed integer programming) and heuristic methods which have lower run-time but can only give a bound on distance (examples include random information set, syndrome decoder algorithms, and Stim undetectable error methods). We further develop the QDistEvol algorithm and show that it performs well for the quantum LDPC codes in our benchmark. The algorithms and test data have been made available to the community in the codeDistance Python package. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2603.22532 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2603.22532v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.22532 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Mark Webster [view email] [v1] Mon, 23 Mar 2026 19:52:23 UTC (10,517 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Distance-Finding Algorithms for Quantum Codes and Circuits, by Mark Webster and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-03 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics