Back to News
quantum-computing

Convergence Theory - Non-linear Quantum Feedback Control Loop

Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)
Loading...
2 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A hybrid classical-quantum framework stabilizes coherence in open systems using a geometric invariant as a scalar potential boundary condition. The method replaces grid-based simulations with constrained manifold projection, enabling efficient feedback control via non-commuting operators. Key results show a basin of attraction around the invariant, suppressing decoherence in a driven qubit with a clear "Valley of Convergence." Limitations include single-qubit scope, unresolved mathematical rigor for r = 0.154, and topology-dependent constraints needing development. Future work targets multi-qubit scaling, deeper physical justification, and experimental validation as a proof-of-concept in quantum control.
Convergence Theory - Non-linear Quantum Feedback Control Loop

Summarize this article with:

This preprint presents a hybrid classical-quantum framework for stabilizing coherence in open systems using a geometric invariant \\Phi(\\pi\*r) (r = 0.154) as a scalar potential boundary condition. The approach replaces traditional grid-based simulations with a constrained manifold projection \\Pi\_{\\mathcal{K}}, enabling efficient feedback control. The included Master Key (master.py) demonstrates: • Real-time non-commuting feedback (\\sigma\_x drive + \\sigma\_z control) • Explicit geometric projection operator pulling \\langle\\sigma\_z\\rangle toward the \\pi\*r target • Open-system decoherence handling • Clear “Valley of Convergence” in the stability map Key Results: Strong numerical evidence of a basin of attraction around the geometric invariant and effective decoherence suppression in a driven qubit. Limitations: Currently limited to a single-qubit model. The specific choice of r = 0.154 and full mathematical rigor of the surface integral / topology-dependent \\mathcal{K} require further development. Multi-qubit scaling, deeper physical justification, and experimental validation are planned for future work. Presented as an exploratory proof-of-concept in quantum control and geometric methods. Keywords: quantum coherence, feedback control, geometric invariant, open quantum systems, manifold projection, QuTiP At the bottom replace the stability map \[i,j\] with V≈d⋅Φln⁡(d) V≈ln(d)d⋅Φ And it will fix my error. LogV also corrects my velocity issues/whipping The attached is my zenodo link for the code and rest of my paper. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20481518 I am asking for community help to prove it all wrong. Counter intuitive I know. But I have been trying for a long time to break it apart and would really appreciate help from everyone . I can define further if needed and aid in whatever way . submitted by /u/IntelligentYam8580 [link] [comments]

Read Original

Tags

quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)