Back to News
quantum-computing

A Comprehensive Analysis of Accuracy and Robustness in Quantum Neural Networks

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A team of researchers compared three hybrid quantum-classical architectures—Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNN), Quantum Recurrent Neural Networks (QRNN), and Quantum Vision Transformers (QViT)—on generalization, accuracy, and robustness. The study reveals all models excel on low-feature datasets like MNIST but struggle with high-dimensional data, with QCNNs performing worst in high-feature scenarios. Against adversarial noise, traditional architectures (QRNNs and QCNNs) show greater resilience, while transformer-based QViTs lag in this domain. Under quantum noise (measurement, channel, finite-shot effects), QViTs outperform others, maintaining robustness where rival architectures degrade significantly. The findings highlight the need for NISQ-era model selection tailored to specific noise conditions and dataset complexities.
A Comprehensive Analysis of Accuracy and Robustness in Quantum Neural Networks

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2604.26110 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 28 Apr 2026] Title:A Comprehensive Analysis of Accuracy and Robustness in Quantum Neural Networks Authors:Ban Q. Tran, Duong M. Chu, Hai T.D. Pham, Viet Q. Nguyen, Quan A. Pham, Susan Mengel View a PDF of the paper titled A Comprehensive Analysis of Accuracy and Robustness in Quantum Neural Networks, by Ban Q. Tran and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has recently emerged as a highly promising research frontier. Within this domain, Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs),characterized by Variational Quantum Circuits (VQCs) at their core and featuring layers of quantum gates optimized by classical algorithms, have garnered significant attention. However, a rigorous and exhaustive evaluation of their practical performance remains largely incomplete. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of three prominent hybrid classical-quantum architectures: Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNN), Quantum Recurrent Neural Networks (QRNN), and Quantum Vision Transformers (QViT), focusing on the critical dimensions of generalization, accuracy, and robustness. Our findings provide novel insights that address previous evaluative gaps. Notably, while these models exhibit exceptional performance on low-feature datasets such as MNIST, their learning efficacy degrades significantly when transitioned to high-feature datasets. Furthermore, convolutional-based models like QCNN appear less effective on high-dimensional data than other machine learning architectures. Additionally, while all models are susceptible to adversarial noise, traditional architectures, such as recurrent and convolutional networks, demonstrate superior resilience. Conversely, in the presence of quantum noise, the transformer-based architecture proves its strength by maintaining high robustness against measurement noise, channel noise, and finite-shot effects, whereas other architectures suffer marked performance declines. These results provide a granular perspective on the current state of the field and underscore the critical importance of tailoring model selection to the constraints of contemporary Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) environments. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2604.26110 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2604.26110v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.26110 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Ban Tran [view email] [v1] Tue, 28 Apr 2026 20:53:23 UTC (1,296 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled A Comprehensive Analysis of Accuracy and Robustness in Quantum Neural Networks, by Ban Q. Tran and 5 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-04 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-machine-learning
government-funding

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics