Back to News
quantum-computing

Comparing and correcting robustness metrics for quantum optimal control

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers from the University of Chicago and IBM Quantum have identified critical numerical discrepancies between two theoretically equivalent robustness metrics—adjoint end-point and toggling-frame approaches—in quantum optimal control. The team introduced a novel discretization correction for the toggling-frame method, significantly improving its accuracy in estimating first-order error susceptibility, addressing a long-standing limitation in quantum pulse optimization. Their study treats robustness as a primary optimization objective, integrating it directly into constrained quantum control frameworks while maintaining fidelity thresholds and hardware limitations. Single- and two-qubit experiments under realistic conditions demonstrated the method’s superiority, offering precise, physics-informed robustness metrics for error-resistant quantum operations. The work advances practical quantum control by providing tools to mitigate hardware drift and modeling errors, crucial for scalable, fault-tolerant quantum computing.
Comparing and correcting robustness metrics for quantum optimal control

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2602.10349 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 10 Feb 2026] Title:Comparing and correcting robustness metrics for quantum optimal control Authors:Andrew T. Kamen, Samuel Fine, Bikrant Bhattacharyya, Frederic T. Chong, Andy J. Goldschmidt View a PDF of the paper titled Comparing and correcting robustness metrics for quantum optimal control, by Andrew T. Kamen and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Control pulses that nominally optimize fidelity are sensitive to routine hardware drift and modeling errors. Robust quantum optimal control seeks error-insensitive control pulses that maintain fidelity thresholds and obey hardware constraints. Distinct numerical approximations to the first-order error susceptibility include adjoint end-point and toggling-frame approaches. Although theoretically equivalent, we provide a novel, systematic study demonstrating important numerical differences between these two approaches. We also introduce a critical discretization correction to the widely-used toggling-frame robustness estimator, measurably improving its estimate of first-order error susceptibility. We accomplish our study by positioning robustness as a first-class objective within direct, constrained optimal control. Our approach uniquely handles control and fidelity constraints while cleanly isolating robustness for dedicated optimization. In both single- and two-qubit examples under realistic constraints, our approach provides an analytic edge for obtaining precise, physics-informed robustness. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2602.10349 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2602.10349v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.10349 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Andrew Kamen [view email] [v1] Tue, 10 Feb 2026 22:44:16 UTC (2,388 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Comparing and correcting robustness metrics for quantum optimal control, by Andrew T. Kamen and 4 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-02 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics