Back to News
quantum-computing

Better Quantum Computing Stock: Rigetti Computing vs. D-Wave Quantum - The Motley Fool

Google News – Quantum Computing
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Rigetti’s gate-based quantum computing approach holds greater long-term potential but faces volatile revenue, while D-Wave’s hybrid quantum-classical systems generate steadier near-term income. D-Wave leads in financial stability with $836.2M in cash versus Rigetti’s $447M, despite both reporting heavy losses, giving it a longer operational runway before needing additional funding. Commercial quantum computing remains 5–20 years away, per Morningstar, forcing both firms to repeatedly raise capital, risking shareholder dilution amid uncertain timelines and escalating R&D costs. Alphabet emerges as a safer quantum investment, offering advanced research without existential risk, funded by its core business, unlike pure-play firms fighting for survival with inflated valuations. Neither Rigetti nor D-Wave justifies its multi-billion-dollar market cap given high uncertainty, making diversified tech giants like Alphabet a more pragmatic choice for quantum exposure.
Better Quantum Computing Stock: Rigetti Computing vs. D-Wave Quantum - The Motley Fool

Summarize this article with:

By Johnny Rice – Mar 2, 2026 at 2:00AM ESTKey PointsRigetti's gate-based approach offers more long-term upside, while D-Wave's hybrid systems generate steadier near-term revenue.D-Wave has the edge on survival metrics, with a larger cash position and an equivalent operating loss.But Alphabet offers quantum exposure without the existential risk, backed by a business that can fund R&D indefinitely.Rigetti Computing (RGTI 6.54%) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS 6.75%) are two of the most popular pure-play quantum computing stocks on the market. Which one has the edge in the race to bring this revolutionary technology to market? Rigetti and D-Wave are taking very different approaches Without getting too technical -- there is a lot of industry jargon -- Rigetti builds quantum computing systems and sells access to them. The company is still very much in research-and-development mode, and its income tends to be very "lumpy" -- that is, it varies greatly quarter to quarter. Image source: Getty Images. D-Wave has chosen to commercialize sooner, offering access to "hybrid" systems that combine quantum and classical computing. It has somewhat steadier income because of that, though that's all relative in this industry. ExpandNYSE: QBTSD-Wave QuantumToday's Change(-6.75%) $-1.36Current Price$18.78Key Data PointsMarket Cap$7.0BDay's Range$17.65 - $19.5052wk Range$4.45 - $46.75Volume27MAvg Vol33MGross Margin82.59% I'd give the edge to Rigetti in this respect. Its approach is generally considered to have more upside and greater long-term potential. That's why most investors are interested in quantum in the first place. ExpandNASDAQ: RGTIRigetti ComputingToday's Change(-6.54%) $-1.22Current Price$17.42Key Data PointsMarket Cap$5.7BDay's Range$16.63 - $18.1752wk Range$6.86 - $58.15Volume26MAvg Vol33MGross Margin-6849.48% The numbers: Rigetti vs. D-Wave All that is nice, but what are the actual numbers? Let's compare some key figures: Company NameRevenue (TTM)Free Cash Flow (TTM)Cash and EquivalentsRigetti Computing$7.5 Million($67.6 Million)$447.0 MillionD-Wave Quantum$24.1 Million($54.8 Million)$836.2 Million I'd have to give the edge here to D-Wave, not for its higher sales, but for the fact that the company has a longer runway before it has to raise more cash, at least as it stands today. What really matters at this point is how long these companies can survive without diluting their shareholders further than they already have. The timeline problem for quantum computing And that's the key. Quantum computing -- the real commercial kind that delivers significant value -- could be much further off than those in the industry hope. While some bulls think it's just a few years off, there's plenty of reason to believe it will be much longer. Morningstar's analysis puts early quantum commercialization at five to 10 years away, while general-use quantum computing -- what we're after -- is likely 20 years out. At current burn rates -- which are likely to grow significantly as the technology matures and the companies prepare to scale -- neither can fund that runway without repeatedly selling more shares, diluting existing investors along the way. A smarter way to invest in quantum computing In my view, neither company is worth investing in at this point -- not when they carry multi-billion dollar market capitalizations. There is far too much uncertainty to justify those valuations. If you want quantum exposure, I would look outside of the pure plays to Alphabet. The company offers arguably the most advanced quantum research program there is. It has the resources to fund quantum R&D indefinitely while Rigetti and D-Wave fight to survive.Read NextMar 1, 2026 •By Keith NoonanWhy Rigetti Computing Stock Surged This WeekFeb 27, 2026 •By Johnny RiceWhy Rigetti Computing Stock Slumped on FridayFeb 27, 2026 •By Johnny RiceWhere Will Rigetti Computing Be in 5 Years?Feb 25, 2026 •By Rich SmithForget Rigetti Computing: This Dividend‑Paying Powerhouse Has a Much Stronger UpsideFeb 24, 2026 •By Johnny RiceWhere Will Rigetti Computing Be by 2030?Feb 21, 2026 •By Johnny RiceVanguard Owns 36 Million Shares of Rigetti Computing. Here's Why That $577 Million Position Doesn't Mean What You Think It Does.About the AuthorJohnny Rice is a contributing writer for The Motley Fool covering tech stocks. He previously contributed to various financial publications.TMFJohnnyRiceStocks MentionedRigetti ComputingNASDAQ: RGTI$17.42(-6.54%)-$1.22D-Wave QuantumNYSE: QBTS$18.75(-6.93%)-$1.40*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Read Original

Tags

quantum-computing
rigetti
d-wave

Source Information

Source: Google News – Quantum Computing