Back to News
quantum-computing

Benchmarking Quantum Data Center Architectures: A Performance and Scalability Perspective

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers benchmarked four quantum data center architectures—QFly, BCube, Clos, and Fat-Tree—revealing critical performance gaps in distributed quantum computing (DQC) under real-world constraints. The study highlights how topology choices directly impact execution latency and scalability. Optical-loss-induced delays in EPR pair generation and coherence-limited entanglement retry windows emerged as dominant bottlenecks, differing from classical data center evaluations. These quantum-specific factors significantly degrade performance in teleportation-based non-local gates. Path diversity and length, alongside shared Bell State Measurement (BSM) resources, were found to interact unpredictably with optical-switch insertion loss and reconfiguration delays. Architecture alone doesn’t dictate performance—scheduling policies play an equally critical role. Diverse quantum circuit workloads showed that no single architecture excels universally. Trade-offs between resource contention, latency, and scalability vary by use case, requiring tailored design approaches for DQC systems. The findings provide the first quantitative framework for optimizing quantum data centers, emphasizing the need to co-design topology, physical-layer parameters, and scheduling to achieve scalable, high-performance distributed quantum computing.
Benchmarking Quantum Data Center Architectures: A Performance and Scalability Perspective

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2601.01353 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 4 Jan 2026] Title:Benchmarking Quantum Data Center Architectures: A Performance and Scalability Perspective Authors:Shahrooz Pouryousef, Eneet Kaur, Hassan Shapourian, Don Towsley, Ramana Kompella, Reza Nejabati View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Quantum Data Center Architectures: A Performance and Scalability Perspective, by Shahrooz Pouryousef and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Scalable distributed quantum computing (DQC) has motivated the design of multiple quantum data-center (QDC) architectures that overcome the limitations of single quantum processors through modular interconnection. While these architectures adopt fundamentally different design philosophies, their relative performance under realistic quantum hardware constraints remains poorly understood. In this paper, we present a systematic benchmarking study of four representative QDC architectures-QFly, BCube, Clos, and Fat-Tree-quantifying their impact on distributed quantum circuit execution latency, resource contention, and scalability. Focusing on quantum-specific effects absent from classical data-center evaluations, we analyze how optical-loss-induced Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) pair generation delays, coherence-limited entanglement retry windows, and contention from teleportation-based non-local gates shape end-to-end execution performance. Across diverse circuit workloads, we evaluate how architectural properties such as path diversity and path length, and shared BSM (Bell State Measurement) resources interact with optical-switch insertion loss and reconfiguration delay. Our results show that distributed quantum performance is jointly shaped by topology, scheduling policies, and physical-layer parameters, and that these factors interact in nontrivial ways. Together, these insights provide quantitative guidance for the design of scalable and high-performance quantum data-center architectures for DQC. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI); Performance (cs.PF) Cite as: arXiv:2601.01353 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2601.01353v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.01353 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Shahrooz Pouryousef [view email] [v1] Sun, 4 Jan 2026 03:48:02 UTC (453 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Quantum Data Center Architectures: A Performance and Scalability Perspective, by Shahrooz Pouryousef and 5 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-01 Change to browse by: cs cs.DC cs.NI cs.PF References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-computing
quantum-hardware
quantum-optimization

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics