A/B Benchmark: IBM Level 3 Compiler vs. Custom on ibm fez
Summarize this article with:
Ill keep this brief. Its quite late...or early, depending on when you woke up. Anyway, I built a custom script that intercepts the execution, calculates a specific physical hardware map JIT, and forces a Level 0 override. The test ibm fez- 5-Qubit GHZ State - 2,000 shots per method. Same timestamp, same calibration window. IBM Native compiler Parameters: optimization level=3 Target States Hit: 1,740 Error Tail: 260 Absolute Fidelity: 87.00% Custom JIT Routing Parameters: Custom (Proprietary) Target States Hit: 1,770 Error Tail: 230 Absolute Fidelity: 88.50% 1.5% absolute fidelity boost resulting in an 11.54% reduction in total hardware errors. Curious if anyone else is having better luck building their own rather than trusting the commercial defaults. submitted by /u/The_Theorist_Guy [link] [comments]