Back to News
quantum-computing

Balancing Quasi-Bragg Regime and Velocity Selectivity in Quantum-Enhanced Atom Interferometry

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
German researchers from TU Darmstadt and Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz identified a critical balance in quantum-enhanced atom interferometry using Bragg diffraction, published May 2026. The study reveals that sub-shot-noise sensitivity—key for precision measurements—requires intermediate-duration light pulses to avoid parasitic diffraction (short pulses) or velocity selectivity (long pulses). Analytical models show higher-order diffraction degrades performance, but optimizing the input quantum state partially mitigates these losses in Mach-Zehnder interferometers. Bragg diffraction’s role in large-momentum transfer is confirmed, though its two-level approximation breaks down under short pulses, limiting real-world applicability. The work advances quantum metrology by quantifying trade-offs in pulse duration, offering a path to more robust atomic sensors.
Balancing Quasi-Bragg Regime and Velocity Selectivity in Quantum-Enhanced Atom Interferometry

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2605.21643 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 20 May 2026] Title:Balancing Quasi-Bragg Regime and Velocity Selectivity in Quantum-Enhanced Atom Interferometry Authors:Christian Miguel Karres (1 and 2), Daniel Derr (1), Enno Giese (1) ((1) Technical University of Darmstadt, (2) Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz) View a PDF of the paper titled Balancing Quasi-Bragg Regime and Velocity Selectivity in Quantum-Enhanced Atom Interferometry, by Christian Miguel Karres (1 and 2) and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Spin squeezing in atomic ensembles enables atom interferometry with sensitivities below the shot-noise limit, but the associated entanglement is highly susceptible to loss, making imperfections in atom optics a central limitation. Bragg diffraction is an established technique for driving transitions between atomic momentum states and enables large-momentum transfer through higher-order diffraction while preserving the internal state. However, it is intrinsically limited by two competing mechanisms: short light pulses induce parasitic diffraction into off-resonant orders beyond an effective two-level description, while long pulses face velocity selectivity. We derive analytical expressions in a second-quantized framework for the atom optics and phase uncertainty of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer including these effects. We demonstrate that sub-shot-noise scaling is achieved only in a regime of intermediate pulse duration. Furthermore, we show that deleterious effects of higher-order diffraction are partially mitigated by optimizing the input quantum state. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Atomic Physics (physics.atom-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2605.21643 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2605.21643v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.21643 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Christian Karres [view email] [v1] Wed, 20 May 2026 18:55:48 UTC (2,335 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Balancing Quasi-Bragg Regime and Velocity Selectivity in Quantum-Enhanced Atom Interferometry, by Christian Miguel Karres (1 and 2) and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: physics physics.atom-ph References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

government-funding
quantum-algorithms

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics