Back to News
quantum-computing

Anomalous Bell curve shape on ibm_marrakesh — has anyone seen this on other backends?

Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)
Loading...
1 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A Reddit user observed an unexplained 1.7° shift in Bell correlation measurements on IBM’s ibm_marrakesh and ibm_fez quantum processors, with the 50% crossover point at ~88.3° instead of the expected 90°. The anomaly persists across both chips (α = 0.467–0.470), suggesting a systematic error rather than hardware-specific noise, defying typical qubit variability patterns in quantum devices. Common error sources—readout asymmetry, Ry gate offsets, T2 decoherence, and crosstalk—were ruled out, leaving pulse-level gate miscalibration as the leading untested hypothesis due to lack of low-level access. A custom deformation model fit the data far better than standard quantum mechanics plus visibility (Δχ² = 124.5, 1 dof), hinting at an unaccounted physical or calibration effect in IBM’s Heron-era processors. The user seeks community input on similar observations in other backends (Eagle, Osprey, trapped ions) or known IBM systematics producing smooth sinusoidal residuals, with data shared via Zenodo and GitHub.
Anomalous Bell curve shape on ibm_marrakesh — has anyone seen this on other backends?

Summarize this article with:

Running a full angle-sweep Bell correlation measurement (37 angles, 0°–180°, 8192 shots) on ibm_marrakesh and ibm_fez, I'm seeing a consistent crossover shift in P_disagree(δ) — the 50% point lands at ~88.3° instead of 90°. The deformation model fits significantly better than QM+visibility (Δχ² = 124.5, 1 dof). Tested and ruled out: readout asymmetry, Ry gate offset (~20% contribution but wrong shape), T2 decoherence (acts in the opposite direction), angle-dependent gate duration, qubit-qubit crosstalk. What's left open: pulse-level gate miscalibration, which I can't test without pulse access. The effect is consistent across both chips (α = 0.467 vs 0.470), which is what makes it interesting — hardware artifacts are usually chip-specific. Has anyone run a similar full-angle Bell sweep on Heron-era chips or other backends (Eagle, Osprey, trapped ion) and seen something like this? Or know of a known IBM systematic that produces a smooth sinusoidal residual? Preprint + data + scripts: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18949735 Repo: https://github.com/3axap4eHko/bell-curve-asymmetry submitted by /u/3axap4eHko [link] [comments]

Read Original

Tags

trapped-ion
quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)