Back to News
quantum-computing

A 67%-Rate CSS Code on the FCC Lattice: [[192,130,3]] from Weight-12 Stabilizers

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A new high-rate quantum error-correcting code achieves 67% encoding efficiency using a 3D face-centered cubic (FCC) lattice, far surpassing the 2.8% rate of traditional 3D toric codes. The CSS stabilizer code employs 12-weight stabilizers on lattice edges, with X-stabilizers on octahedral voids and Z-stabilizers on vertices, enabling [[192,130,3]] parameters at L=4 and [[648,434,3]] at L=6. Exhaustive verification confirms a minimum distance of 3, proven by eliminating low-weight errors and constructing weight-3 non-stabilizer codewords, though at the cost of lower distance than toric codes. A tailored minimum-weight perfect matching decoder demonstrates 10x–63x error suppression at physical error rates of 0.001–0.0005, optimizing performance for fault-tolerant architectures. The design’s structural surplus—3L³ edges with only L³–2 constraints—unlocks high logical qubit density, positioning it for neutral-atom and photonic quantum computing platforms.
A 67%-Rate CSS Code on the FCC Lattice: [[192,130,3]] from Weight-12 Stabilizers

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2603.20294 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 19 Mar 2026] Title:A 67%-Rate CSS Code on the FCC Lattice: [[192,130,3]] from Weight-12 Stabilizers Authors:Raghu Kulkarni View a PDF of the paper titled A 67%-Rate CSS Code on the FCC Lattice: [[192,130,3]] from Weight-12 Stabilizers, by Raghu Kulkarni View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We construct a three-dimensional Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) stabilizer code on the Face-Centered Cubic (FCC) lattice. Physical qubits reside on the edges of the lattice (coordination $K=12$); X-stabilizers act on octahedral voids and Z-stabilizers on vertices, both with uniform weight 12. Computational verification confirms CSS validity ($H_{X}H_{Z}^{T}=0$ over GF(2)) and reveals $k=2L^{3}+2$ logical qubits: $k=130$ at $L=4$ and $k=434$ at $L=6$, yielding encoding rates of 67.7% and 67.0% respectively. The minimum distance $d=3$ is proven exactly by exhaustive elimination of all weight-$\le 2$ candidates combined with constructive weight-3 non-stabilizer codewords. The code parameters are [[192, 130, 3]] at $L=4$ and [[648, 434, 3]] at $L=6$. This rate is 24x higher than the cubic 3D toric code (2.8% at $d=4$), though at a lower distance ($d=3$ vs. $d=4$); the comparison is across different distances. The high rate originates in a structural surplus: the FCC lattice has $3L^{3}$ edges but only $L^{3}-2$ independent stabilizer constraints, leaving $k=2L^{3}+2$ logical degrees of freedom. We provide a minimum-weight perfect matching (MWPM) decoder adapted to the FCC geometry, demonstrate a 10x coding gain at $p=0.001$ (and 63x at $p=0.0005$), and discuss implications for fault-tolerant quantum computing on neutral-atom and photonic platforms. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) MSC classes: 81P73, 94B60, 52C17 ACM classes: E.4; J.2; F.2.2 Cite as: arXiv:2603.20294 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2603.20294v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.20294 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Raghu Kulkarni Mr [view email] [v1] Thu, 19 Mar 2026 02:57:55 UTC (98 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled A 67%-Rate CSS Code on the FCC Lattice: [[192,130,3]] from Weight-12 Stabilizers, by Raghu KulkarniView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-03 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-computing
quantum-algorithms
quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics