Back to News
general

Implemented CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium in a 14-layer AI governance framework - looking for feedback on PQC integration approach

Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)
Loading...
1 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A developer unveiled an open-source AI governance framework integrating NIST-standardized post-quantum cryptography (PQC) to secure autonomous systems like swarm robotics and fleet coordination. The framework uses CRYSTALS-Kyber768 for quantum-resistant key encapsulation and CRYSTALS-Dilithium (ML-DSA-65) for signing governance decisions, embedded within a 14-layer security architecture. Advanced mathematical models—hyperbolic geometry for trust boundaries and Hamiltonian paths for control flow integrity—enhance resilience against quantum and classical attacks. The creator seeks peer feedback on the Kyber-Dilithium pairing’s suitability, hybrid classical/PQC transition strategies, and the realism of quantum threats to AI governance. A live demo and GitHub repository are available, with a patent pending (#63/961,403) for the underlying methodology.
Implemented CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium in a 14-layer AI governance framework - looking for feedback on PQC integration approach

Summarize this article with:

I've been building an open-source framework (SCBE-AETHERMOORE) that integrates post-quantum cryptographic primitives into AI governance workflows. The core implementation uses: - Kyber768 for key encapsulation in agent-to-agent communication - ML-DSA-65 (Dilithium) for signing governance decisions - Hyperbolic geometry for modeling trust boundaries across 14 security layers - Hamiltonian path-based control flow integrity checks The idea is that as AI systems become more autonomous (fleet coordination, swarm robotics), the governance layer securing them needs to be quantum-resistant from day one rather than retrofitted later. I'd appreciate feedback from the PQC community on: Is the Kyber768 + ML-DSA-65 pairing a reasonable default for this use case? Any thoughts on hybrid classical/PQC approaches for the transition period? How realistic is the threat model for AI governance specifically? Live demo: https://huggingface.co/spaces/issdandavis/SCBE-AETHERMOORE-Demo GitHub: https://github.com/issdandavis/SCBE-AETHERMOORE Patent pending (#63/961,403). Would love to hear thoughts from anyone working in PQC or AI security. submitted by /u/Prudent-Prize-2561 [link] [comments]

Read Original

Tags

post-quantum-cryptography
quantum-investment
partnership

Source Information

Source: Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)